RainyCityHockey
Registered User
I love that draft.
Musty is high HIGH skill, with a big strong frame, and he can move. One of the top per minute scoring rates in all of junior. He has a compete issue that would make him a poor fit as is. Seems afraid of contact on the wall. This is a guy that tough coaching could potentially transform into a beastly top line winger. I think you take the long path with him and make him work for every minute he gets. But there's risk too and a reason why a lot of teams will pass on him, you don't want to have to teach compete.
Anyone we'll take at #20 will have potential and some weaknesses that could exclude him from realising their full potential.
Overall I'm not that high on Musty but some question marks about their games aren't make or break for me with this pick.
To me you swing for the fences at #20 and see what happens.
So no matter if the guy has the problems like Musty or might be a bit undersized or what not.
I don't fully care as long as they have one exceptional or strong part of their game that does stand out at least somewhat.
The "sure guys" and "good hockey players" you can take in the 2nd round(and beyond) where the scouts and Francis, so far, seem to have made good decisions in their first two drafts already.
Picking at 20 is going to be more relaxed I think. We have some decent options available already and likely that some prospects drop.
You're right someone(probably even more than one) will drop and we can just take the guy at #20.
Though, I do think it will be a wing but that would fit after having drafted two centers in previous years.