Lol, he’ll push him back a foot and fall like I’ve seen him do many times.It’s worth the wait to see Leonard crush him in the open ice.
Well one was a LW and the other is a RW. It’s also ignoring the fact they traded for a good young centre in the last draft and might even trade for another good young centre in this one.
We should not have an issue with drafting wingers when the top ones in the system before last draft were Farrell and Roy. Nothing special.
I get it, but if you consider them the BPA...youre not gonna go out of your way to diversify your picks at the expense of upside.
Dvorsky is more of what we already have. Safe and boring.If Dvorsky and Leonard both hit, Dvorsky is a significantly more valuable asset that can also play on the wing. There’s not nearly enough of a gap between them (I actually prefer Dvorsky besides) to justify taking the winger. Michkov is another story.
There was no overlap at all from 5 to 6. Not a single scout who believed any of the top 5 should drop to 6.So no scouts had Leonard top 5?
There was no overlap at all from 5 to 6. Not a single scout who believed any of the top 5 should drop to 6.
A clear line in the sand.
Having two Suzuki’s isn’t terrible imo but I get what you’re sayingDvorsky is more of what we already have. Safe and boring.
I want Smith or Michkov. Would be okay with Benson.
I'd legit rather trade down and take Moore ++ than Reinbacher or Leonard.
Dvorsky is more of what we already have. Safe and boring.
Absolutely not. I love Moore, but there's no way you pass over Leonard and Reinbacher for Moore. Like none.
I agree with this.Well one was a LW and the other is a RW. It’s also ignoring the fact they traded for a good young centre in the last draft and might even trade for another good young centre in this one.
Bedard
Fantilli
Michkov
Carlsson
Dvorsky
Smith
Leonard.
Give me one of those guys and I’ll be happy.
But wasn’t the question worded something like,” if Michkov gets past the five spot, what team could you see picking him?”There was always a chance but it seems very unlikely, just listen to Bob talk about the Michkov situation, I don't think he has any indication from the Canadiens organization they are interested in picking Michkov.
There was always a chance but it seems very unlikely, just listen to Bob talk about the Michkov situation, I don't think he has any indication from the Canadiens organization they are interested in picking Michkov.
... while getting 60 points and "HaViNg JaM"It’s worth the wait to see Leonard crush him in the open ice.
Very intriguing prospect! High ceiling. Not sure about his floor.Getting Nadeau at #31 would be pretty rad. In a lot of ways he's like a lite Bedard, lots of offensive tools to develop with him. His shot alone could become a legit pro plus weapon.
We've seen countless guys not reach their "floors" over the last 15 years. Let's go for ceiling and if it doesn't work out at least we triedVery intriguing prospect! High ceiling. Not sure about his floor.
Agreed 100%. Swing for the fences at that point. I don't know if he'll still be there at #31.We've seen countless guys not reach their "floors" over the last 15 years. Let's go for ceiling and if it doesn't work out at least we tried
Oh he has next to no floor at all, he's a total homerun swing type. With our much improved development staff I think our odds are much better with a prospect like that than before though.Very intriguing prospect! High ceiling. Not sure about his floor.
He has a lot of momentum heading into the draft. His name's being brought up a lot as a sleeper. I have a feeling he won't be there at #31.