KaseMeOutside
Based
- Oct 18, 2011
- 44,302
- 10,249
and we would all be very happy to have a center version of that...best case scenario he ends up like matt tkachuk
and we would all be very happy to have a center version of that...best case scenario he ends up like matt tkachuk
I feel like you're not giving Terry enough love on his shooting. He did score 37.Fantilli and McTavish will be the Ducks only forwards with elite shots and 1 timers. Carlsson would be another Zegras/Terry playmaker except he's big though. Needed another shot like McT and Need someone other than Lundestrom that extremely fast.
Zero. High IQ player with strong compete level and 2way play and his numbers in NCAA are 2nd to only Eichel. The defense and 2way play of Beniers with the offensive ceiling of Eichel/Matthews.alright I have to ask the more knowledgable posters on this..
what are the chances we get Byfielded with Fantilli?
This was supposedly his "bad tournament". He is quite multi-dimensional and contributes to his team in many ways, I especially see this useful in the playoffs.
The only knock on him I guess I see in him is he's quite perimeter-focused. He still goes to the net many times tho, and certainly is not soft so it should be ok.
Worth to mention is Fantilli, Zegras, McTavish, Lundestrom are all lefties. Terry, Gaucher are righties
This was supposedly his "bad tournament". He is quite multi-dimensional and contributes to his team in many ways, I especially see this useful in the playoffs.
The only knock on him I guess I see in him is he's quite perimeter-focused. He still goes to the net many times tho, and certainly is not soft so it should be ok.
Worth to mention is Fantilli, Zegras, McTavish, Lundestrom are all lefties. Terry, Gaucher are righties
Well, there's a reason why Bedard got those minutes tho but that tournament is nothing to be ashamed for, I think he was amazing there. As @goonsaredumb mentioned, he executed his role perfectly. He was a bit snakebitten tbh, missed on opportunities he'd have burried in the NCAAI think they had him on wing and limited minutes too they might’ve mentioned it in that video actually
Byfield was dominating physically in juniors against a bunch of players his age and younger.alright I have to ask the more knowledgable posters on this..
what are the chances we get Byfielded with Fantilli?
Well put. I don't see the scenario repeating at all and I was among the ones cautious about Byfield's potential.Byfield was dominating physically in juniors against a bunch of players his age and younger.
Fantilli won the Hobey Baker as a freshman, playing in a tough conference, where he was younger and less developed physically than most of the guys he was playing against.
There's no comparison between the two situations really. Byfield is more comparable to Lafreniere or someone like that.
This video is really interesting. It's 1 year old, looking at his USHL year (in Chicago, lol). He plays a bit differently here, seems to be less-perimeter, it's a great analysis as always from Elite Prospects. Also mentions his shortcomings at that time.
Overall, I think he showed all he could show in the NCAA, time to go Pro and start adjusting his game for that:
Gotta remember that the big ice and IIHF rules should favor Carlsson in this case, but it shouldn't be too big of a difference. Fantill might actually showcase his speed...I’m over being F’d again. Lets focus on this pick which is going to net us a franchise potential player. Thanks @Rasp for the poll.
The WC is going to be very interesting for us to watch, Literally have the consensus 2nd and 3rdOA, and does Carlsson overtake Fantilli? Going to be fun to watch this tournament.
Gotta remember that the big ice and IIHF rules should favor Carlsson in this case, but it shouldn't be too big of a difference. Fantill might actually showcase his speed...
Can we unlock the draft thread and move draft discussion back there?I’m over being F’d again. Lets focus on this pick which is going to net us a franchise potential player. Thanks @Rasp for the poll.
The WC is going to be very interesting for us to watch, Literally have the consensus 2nd and 3rdOA, and does Carlsson overtake Fantilli? Going to be fun to watch this tournament.
Can we unlock the draft thread and move draft discussion back there?
Or make this the part 2.
Given what Verbeek has said and done, he loves well-rounded players so I'm thinking he will go with Fantilli. Carlsson is not bad But Fantilli has the speed and mean-streak you just cannot teach. Will be interesting to see. Partially reminds me of Matthews-Laine pre-draft, they both went to the WC and both kicked ass there tho. Will see how these two does.Fantilli has the size and speed, and I think is a better all around player, but Carlsson I think has higher offensive potential. But we need guys who can play defense, be physical, protect the puck, knock guys off the puck, and etc. I think Fantilli has that whole package.
Given what Verbeek has said and done, he loves well-rounded players so I'm thinking he will go with Fantilli. Carlsson is not bad But Fantilli has the speed and mean-streak you just cannot teach. Will be interesting to see. Partially reminds me of Matthews-Laine pre-draft, they both went to the WC and both kicked ass there tho. Will see how these two does.