Old Navy Goat
Registered User
Most of the games start at 6am for East Coast with the Dub at 9am, so I can watch the games then go and run errands etc in the afternoon.
That is the thing that worries me but it doesn’t seem to bother any draft analysts so I guess people think it will be fine.Is there any concern that Barlow physical maturity will limit how the "power" component of his game translates to the next level?
The hockey prospect guys don’t have any concern there, fwiw. Their logic tracks with me.Is there any concern that Barlow physical maturity will limit how the "power" component of his game translates to the next level?
This would be funny as ever to hear rob say all these names
Well, they can't pick him just because he's local. Although Musty is an interesting player, he just wouldn't be in my top at 13.I think some of the posters here should get used to the idea of Quentin Musty at 13. I think he's a VERY real possibility for the Sabres.
I think some of the posters here should get used to the idea of Quentin Musty at 13. I think he's a VERY real possibility for the Sabres.
The local ties are a bonus, but that's not what I'm basing this off of. The Sabres draft philosophy under Adams places a greater emphasis on projectability and what players may be years down the road. Musty has all the tools and traits that you'd want in a modern top line power forward, it just hasn't all come together, yet. The kid is silly puddy as a hockey player. They've also publically stated that they value players that show massive growth/improvement throughout their draft year. Contrasting Musty's second half of the season with his first (starting with the Hlinka) -- it's like watching two different hockey players. His ceiling is sky high (top 5 in the draft high), but he does come with his some risk. Given the Sabres draft philosophy, where they stand organizationally (in terms of needs in the pipeline, rostered talent, etc.), and what's available in this draft...The Sabres can afford to go with an high upside pick and this kid's upside is higher than most.Well, they can't pick him just because he's local. Although Musty is an interesting player, he just wouldn't be in my top at 13.
Well, it's possible, but I'm sure not only Musty had such a season. Still, I would have preferred another player at 13.The local ties are a bonus, but that's not what I'm basing this off of. The Sabres draft philosophy under Adams places a greater emphasis on projectability and what players may be years down the road. Musty has all the tools and traits that you'd want in a modern top line power forward, it just hasn't all come together, yet. The kid is silly puddy as a hockey player. They've also publically stated that they value players that show massive growth/improvement throughout their draft year. Contrasting Musty's second half of the season with his first (starting with the Hlinka) -- it's like watching two different hockey players. His ceiling is sky high (top 5 in the draft high), but he does come with his some risk. Given the Sabres draft philosophy, where they stand organizationally (in terms of needs in the pipeline, rostered talent, etc.), and what's available in this draft...The Sabres can afford to go with an high upside pick and this kid's upside is higher than most.
You laid it out well. It's Musty over Barlow for me for these exact reasons.The local ties are a bonus, but that's not what I'm basing this off of. The Sabres draft philosophy under Adams places a greater emphasis on projectability and what players may be years down the road. Musty has all the tools and traits that you'd want in a modern top line power forward, it just hasn't all come together, yet. The kid is silly puddy as a hockey player. They've also publically stated that they value players that show massive growth/improvement throughout their draft year. Contrasting Musty's second half of the season with his first (starting with the Hlinka) -- it's like watching two different hockey players. His ceiling is sky high (top 5 in the draft high), but he does come with his some risk. Given the Sabres draft philosophy, where they stand organizationally (in terms of needs in the pipeline, rostered talent, etc.), and what's available in this draft...The Sabres can afford to go with an high upside pick and this kid's upside is higher than most.
Understood. For the sake of discussion, who do you like at 13?Well, it's possible, but I'm sure not only Musty had such a season. Still, I would have preferred another player at 13.
SimashevUnderstood. For the sake of discussion, who do you like at 13?
Simashev
Moore
Willander
Benson (if fall)
It’s highly unlikely all of those players work out and as it stands as constructed, the current Sabres are not even small.I want nothing to do with Benson at 13. We have Rosen, Poltapov, Neuchev, Kisakov and Kulich as small wingers competing for a spot. I don’t care about his chemistry with Savoie, because I don’t want two small people on a line.
I’d rather they draft ASP over Benson, and I hate ASP.
I like it.Simashev
Moore
Willander
Benson (if fall)
I'm with you. I will add that although Poltapov is smaller, he plays with a lot of power. I think he'll make the show and become an excellent middle 6 player for the Sabres.I want nothing to do with Benson at 13. We have Rosen, Poltapov, Neuchev, Kisakov and Kulich as small wingers competing for a spot. I don’t care about his chemistry with Savoie, because I don’t want two small people on a line.
I’d rather they draft ASP over Benson, and I hate ASP.
It’s highly unlikely all of those players work out and as it stands as constructed, the current Sabres are not even small.
I like it.
Simashev is another toolsy upside pick, much like Musty, but on defense of course. I've noticed the love he's getting around here and I find it intriguing. Definitely a tantalizing prospect with his size and skating ability.
Moore I'm not sold on being anything more than a utility 3rd liner. I have questions about his vision and IQ. His skating alone, however, will get him into the league one day. What are your thoughts on him?
Willander is my fave here. Can really do it all and fits an organizational need. He also fits the profile of what the Sabres look for in a draft eligible -- That being a player that has shown tremendous growth throughout the season. Has surpassed Axel Sandin-Pellika in my book.
My thoughts on Benson will sound like heresy around here so I'd rather keep them to myself.
I'm with you. I will add that although Poltapov is smaller, he plays with a lot of power. I think he'll make the show and become an excellent middle 6 player for the Sabres.
Strongly disagree. Benson is a very talented and hardworking player and we are not a small team. Chemistry with Savoie has nothing to do with it at all. Even if we didn't have Savoie, I would still choose Benson.I want nothing to do with Benson at 13. We have Rosen, Poltapov, Neuchev, Kisakov and Kulich as small wingers competing for a spot. I don’t care about his chemistry with Savoie, because I don’t want two small people on a line.
I’d rather they draft ASP over Benson, and I hate ASP.
Yeap, Simashev is my favorite. Skating, size, hands, high defensive IQ and still have untapped potential in attack.I like it.
Simashev is another toolsy upside pick, much like Musty, but on defense of course. I've noticed the love he's getting around here and I find it intriguing. Definitely a tantalizing prospect with his size and skating ability.
Moore I'm not sold on being anything more than a utility 3rd liner. I have questions about his vision and IQ. His skating alone, however, will get him into the league one day. What are your thoughts on him?
Willander is my fave here. Can really do it all and fits an organizational need. He also fits the profile of what the Sabres look for in a draft eligible -- That being a player that has shown tremendous growth throughout the season. Has surpassed Axel Sandin-Pellika in my book.
My thoughts on Benson will sound like heresy around here so I'd rather keep them to myself.
Benson is smarter, works harder and is a better two way player than any of the guys people would want because they’re three inches taller.
Strongly disagree. Benson is a very talented and hardworking player and we are not a small team. Chemistry with Savoie has nothing to do with it at all. Even if we didn't have Savoie, I would still choose Benson.
Yeap, Simashev is my favorite. Skating, size, hands, high defensive IQ and still have untapped potential in attack.
I like Moore, his skating, speed, level of competition, shoot, such a player is always useful off the puck, leader, good work ethic. Even if he doesn't have a very high ceiling, I think he could still be a decent 2nd laner or great 3C.
Willander good, but I like Simashev a little more. Either way, I'll be fine with Willander.
I would also add Wood to my list here, I like him and skating for me is not a stop sign that he can improve.
Hmm what? How are these two players even comparable? They don't look alike.Benson is a younger version of Olofsson. He’s the definition of “meh”.
I can't help but feel Yager is the prototypical Adams draftpick when I look at who is likely available at 13, but still would not be too big of a reach (McKenzie has him at 15).It would be very Adamsy