wingerdinger
Registered User
- Oct 21, 2018
- 1,317
- 1,311
If Stevie and co really like what they see in willander I have a feeling they'll have to take at #17. He's not making it to them in the 2nd round.
He was one of the few canadians that was good against Sweden. This guy is legit.
#17, Stengberg, Halttunen, Wallinder, Brindley#9 Dalibor Dvorsky
#17 who ever
#4? Maxim Strbak
#4? Juraj Pekarcik
#4? David Edstrom
Detroit Red Wings, hard to play against.
Dalibor Dvorsky is elite, slovakian Sasha Barkov.
Puck protection skills, puck handling, hard shot, defensive awareness, calmness, balance, IQ and during the "playoffs" i started to see that creativity as well. Complete package, exactly the type of player that fit Red Wings identity.
Skating needs bit work but with the right coach that can be fixed in relatively short time. Dvorsky is 3 months older than the youngest player in this draft and his overall game is already in high level.
1. Bedardrealistically he's probably not going to be around when the Wings pick
Poor Mickey.....Wallinder - Willander is a perfect D-pair, Left and Right.
Oops! Meant WillanderWe already have him
I started a thread on that very topic a few weeks ago and the board killed it on the first page of comments because someone said "that's unpossible there's no one that would trade a 6th overall for our two first rounders in this draft because the top 6 are so much better than anyone after 6th" and that was considered a devastating mic drop.#9 Leonard or Dvorsky
#18 Perreault or Stenberg
Any thoughts on trading up for Will Smith if he could be had at 5th or 6th spot?
I realize my recency bias is showing.
Smith probably will be 4or 5. He is very good , but still i stay with 9 and 18I started a thread on that very topic a few weeks ago and the board killed it on the first page of comments because someone said "that's unpossible there's no one that would trade a 6th overall for our two first rounders in this draft because the top 6 are so much better than anyone after 6th" and that was considered a devastating mic drop.
I don't think the gap between Smith and Dvorsky/Moore/Leonard/Perreault is great enough to justify spending too many assets. I'd rather take one of those guys at 9 and hope one falls to 18. If not grab a Stenberg or Willander.#9 Leonard or Dvorsky
#18 Perreault or Stenberg
Any thoughts on trading up for Will Smith if he could be had at 5th or 6th spot?
I realize my recency bias is showing.
If Stevie and co really like what they see in willander I have a feeling they'll have to take at #17. He's not making it to them in the 2nd round.
It’s crazy how many good outcomes there are forThat’s kind of how I’m feeling, too.
If Detroit doesn’t get Reinbacher at #9 then I wouldn’t be mad with Willander at #17 and Leonard at #9 if he’s still available.
I'm hearing a lot of evidence and opinion supporting that it did not matter whether Detroit finished with the 5th worst record or the 10th worst. Either way they're getting a shot at a very good prospect, with nearly everybody from 5 to 10 (or even 15) being in the same boat.
So maybe the win the lottery and we all throw a party. Or maybe they just draft a really good player without needing to shoot for the bottom. I can live with either one.
They would have to win the next round for us to move up a spot and get pick 17.If Florida wins, do we draft higher?
I don't want to get anyone from that Canadian team with #9 pick
#9 Leonard or Dvorsky
#18 Perreault or Stenberg
Any thoughts on trading up for Will Smith if he could be had at 5th or 6th spot?
I realize my recency bias is showing.
Consider USA supper line + Moore are familiar with each other and 4 of them projected to be top 15 , still they were not better than Sweden first line who is average second round. OT goal was kinda lucky , besides Sweden just killed Canada 2 times