Yeah all good.
To me... for whatever reason I really trust our current scouting staff. Probably because of what Bill Armstrong was able to do in STL. I don't really follow prospects but basically after we draft players I watch some highlights, re: Simashev / But I was like, "holy ****" -- but obvi highlights don't tell the full story, not even close. But the highlights were good / borderline elite.
Regardless, BA was able to draft guys like Robert Thomas (20th overall), Tage (26th overall), Kyrou (35th OA), Vince Dunn (56th OA), Barbashev (33OA), Parayko (86th OA), Edmunson (46th OA), Tarasenko (16th OA respectively), etc etc.
I mean, wtf additional track record do you need. The guy knows how to draft. So if he picks up some random draft ppl like Simashev or But (who by the way were also rated highly by a few other respected pubs), wtf do I know about these players. All I know are the highlights are amazing. More importantly based on BA's track record in STL imo YES he absoutely deserves the benefit of the doubt. At least until one (or more) of his highly touted picks is clearly not working out.
But yeah, I'm not under the illusion that I'm a better scout than Bill Armstrong. And in my opinion (and this is my opinion only), I think he deserves the benefit of the doubt based on what he was able to do in STL. So I'm more than happy to give Simashev / But / Cooley the benefit of the doubt until they show me otherwise.
That said, am happy all of us are passionate ppl who are passionate about the same thing. Disagreement is more than fine, absolutely no worries from over here