Langway
In den Wolken
- Jul 7, 2006
- 33,218
- 10,754
Certainly a first year Russian scout won't outweigh Mahoney's thoughts if he deems him to by far be the BPA at 8. But it does reveal some questions at least. You wonder if the ETA combined with them won't lead them to opt for a perceived more stable fast-tracking option. Historically they'd just take him but you wonder if the extra year or two won't lead them elsewhere if they don't believe there's a significant all-around gap in upside. Based on raw skill alone certainly you don't pass on Michkov but there are other traits that are also important for NHL success. There may be more diverse--certainly bigger and stronger--skill sets. If they don't believe in his personality or ethic in improving weaknesses or his coachability it may be enough to opt for a lesser talent but one they're more bullish on their maturity and professionalism.
The industry sense seems to be that some teams may not make a final decision on Michkov until the final days before the draft when they've had a chance to speak face-to-face. Some have already probably ruled him out categorically, be it philosophically or at the ownership level. Not sure I recall a bigger 11th hour bit of drama, though. I still think Dvorsky's probably their guy otherwise given his profile. It's no slam dunk but my .02 hunch.
The industry sense seems to be that some teams may not make a final decision on Michkov until the final days before the draft when they've had a chance to speak face-to-face. Some have already probably ruled him out categorically, be it philosophically or at the ownership level. Not sure I recall a bigger 11th hour bit of drama, though. I still think Dvorsky's probably their guy otherwise given his profile. It's no slam dunk but my .02 hunch.