- Apr 25, 2006
- 54,179
- 61,003
Just realized that Roy was hired as a coach 10 years ago. Time flies.
Just realized that Roy was hired as a coach 10 years ago. Time flies.
I mean he certainly didn’t take a discount. And the dudes body has been falling apart the last 3/4 seasons. It’s a bad deal through and through.I'm still not convinced that Manson deal was bad. When he was healthy, he was a huge difference maker. If he's one man ambulance corps again this year my tune will change, but we need a Manson type back there and he took a discount to stay with us like we needed.
That was already 10 years!?Just realized that Roy was hired as a coach 10 years ago. Time flies.
That was already 10 years!?
View attachment 741108
If there were a large number of pulled muscles, strains, or core tears that could be blamed on training or treatment, then yeah, blame the medical staff. However, I fail to see how guys breaking feet/ankles/legs blocking shots, getting knee and shoulder injuries and concussions because of opponent's hits or pucks/sticks to the head, or a chronic knee injury from an errant skate blade cut is the fault of the team's medial staff. Some of that could be blamed on the style of play they are asked to employ.FYIW Montreal fired their whole medical staff this summer because of the ridiculous number of injuries that the team got in the last 2 seasons.
Here it's been the case for like 5 or 6 years. Basically our entire contender window. Have we changed anything at all?
Surely if Landy turns out no go and will have to retire, which i guess is 50:50 at this point, EP should be legit target, if he decides not to re-sign with Canucks. Just read on the trade boards his decision hangs on how Canucks gonna fare this season.
Yes. That's how we roll!Wait so Manson was being tracked with a device (possibly for speed) skating on his own for the first time in camp after his high ankle sprain, then went over to adjust something (possibly just the tracker that was uncomfortable) said it was fine, then joined the rest of the group, and now we're talking shit about Manson again?
Ankle monitor.Wait so Manson was being tracked with a device (possibly for speed) skating on his own for the first time in camp after his high ankle sprain, then went over to adjust something (possibly just the tracker that was uncomfortable) said it was fine, then joined the rest of the group, and now we're talking shit about Manson again?
It can be a lot of different things: guys coming back too soon, first diagnostic was wrong, etc.If there were a large number of pulled muscles, strains, or core tears that could be blamed on training or treatment, then yeah, blame the medical staff. However, I fail to see how guys breaking feet/ankles/legs blocking shots, getting knee and shoulder injuries and concussions because of opponent's hits or pucks/sticks to the head, or a chronic knee injury from an errant skate blade cut is the fault of the team's medial staff. Some of that could be blamed on the style of play they are asked to employ.
If we don't have a fixer, we have a good fixer.No fixers in the off season.
That's for Nuke.Ankle monitor.
Hopefully, it's more like this :
That's just not even close to true. Byram has plenty of flaws as well.
Nonsense like this doesn't even make it worth responding.
Landy is getting 7, right? So another 5 on top makes it 12. I doubt Petterson is going to get that much. Sure, he had 100 point season, but only single one so far....if he was to leave next year, cause he is not happy with direction Vancouver is heading (as in not winning shit anytime soon), surely only other non-contenders would be able/willing to offer that much. But that would not exactly solve his issue of playing on weak team not competing for Cup, so might as well remain in Vancouver.They'll need an extra $4-5M on top of Landy to afford EP. So they'll have to lose Val and replace him with a $1-2M guy too.
If you look at the roster I posted, the only extra savings they may be able to get from that is maybe a cheaper contract for Malinski, but that means either Malinski or whoever is there instead isn't that great, and the D core will have gone from the deepest in the league to a top heavy one that's suspect aside from the two top guys.
If they lose Landy, the much better plan IMO would be to replace him with a guy making just as much, or even a little less around $6M. That would leave money to spend on their depth.
Are you saying we are old? DanngggJust realized that Roy was hired as a coach 10 years ago. Time flies.
Landy is getting 7, right? So another 5 on top makes it 12. I doubt Petterson is going to get that much. Sure, he had 100 point season, but only single one so far....if he was to leave next year, cause he is not happy with direction Vancouver is heading (as in not winning shit anytime soon), surely only other non-contenders would be able/willing to offer that much. But that would not exactly solve his issue of playing on weak team not competing for Cup, so might as well remain in Vancouver.
I understand your position and you may absolutely be right on whether it was a bad deal in the end, but the bolded is misrepresenting his market. his market was not generic middle pairing physical defenseman, it was cup winning, difference making physical middle pairing defender.I don't know what is going on here. I do know that his shoulder and knee will never be fully right again. His body is breaking down like almost every physical defensemen in their 30s.
4.5 is roughly the market for a middle pairing physical defensemen. It was clearly a bad deal though... wrong side of the aging curve, had been regressing hard with Anaheim for years, the worst type of aging defenseman, and like all UFA contracts at or around 30, you're paying for what they have done and not what they will be. Teams sign these deals almost every summer, and almost all of them age terribly. This will be no exception.
I've been a Manson fan for years prior to the Avs getting him, I expected the Avs to make move for a guy like him, and I didn't want the Avs to re-sign him saying it would be a pretty big mistake. It is a slow motion trainwreck.
I don’t think it was a discount at all….I understand your position and you may absolutely be right on whether it was a bad deal in the end, but the bolded is misrepresenting his market. his market was not generic middle pairing physical defenseman, it was cup winning, difference making physical middle pairing defender.
With that resume, he took at least 1 year and 500k of discount and probably more, maybe even 2 years/750k per.
it's also worth noting we can't just say "Manson was a bad contract" in a vacuum. the alternate replacement and contract for that role should also be in the equation. Who would you have rather signed out of UFA that year? the list was thin AF.
I understand your position and you may absolutely be right on whether it was a bad deal in the end, but the bolded is misrepresenting his market. his market was not generic middle pairing physical defenseman, it was cup winning, difference making physical middle pairing defender.
With that resume, he took at least 1 year and 500k of discount and probably more, maybe even 2 years/750k per.
it's also worth noting we can't just say "Manson was a bad contract" in a vacuum. the alternate replacement and contract for that role should also be in the equation. Who would you have rather signed out of UFA that year? the list was thin AF.