expatriatedtexan
Habitual Line Stepper
- Aug 17, 2005
- 18,578
- 15,004
In order for intimidation to work, the side being intimidated has to actually believe the person intimidating them can do something bad.
In today's environment, can KMac, in fact, enforce? I don't think he can. There have been several times where he's actually the first involved and the refs still jump in and prevent the tussle. A team like Edmonton would have to believe beyond a shadow of a doubt that Kurtis MacDermid would break MacDavid's ankle in retaliation for an ugly hit on Makar in order for intimidation to work. To be clear, I do not condone this, don't believe for a second that Kurtis would do this, or believe it works in today's game.
We're just better off having a better hockey player. That being said, I couldn't find fault in Kurtis' last game. Again, he's being sheltered obviously, but when he's on the ice, he's doing the right thing, and this year actually appears to being closer to only one step behind the play. It's hard to fault an 83.58 xGF% at 5v5.
In today's environment, can KMac, in fact, enforce? I don't think he can. There have been several times where he's actually the first involved and the refs still jump in and prevent the tussle. A team like Edmonton would have to believe beyond a shadow of a doubt that Kurtis MacDermid would break MacDavid's ankle in retaliation for an ugly hit on Makar in order for intimidation to work. To be clear, I do not condone this, don't believe for a second that Kurtis would do this, or believe it works in today's game.
We're just better off having a better hockey player. That being said, I couldn't find fault in Kurtis' last game. Again, he's being sheltered obviously, but when he's on the ice, he's doing the right thing, and this year actually appears to being closer to only one step behind the play. It's hard to fault an 83.58 xGF% at 5v5.