2023-24 Roster Thread #6: A Hall of Famer, a doctor, a policeman and a moose walk into a bar with a Bundy...

Who are your three favorite current Flyers' players (from Oct. 30 roster on team's website)?


  • Total voters
    104
Status
Not open for further replies.

Hollywood Cannon

I'm Away From My Desk
Jul 17, 2007
88,305
160,659
South Jersey
dinner-rolls-in-pan.jpg
 

flyerslducks

Registered User
Feb 15, 2017
12,751
13,609
Wonder what Arizona wanted. Would had to start with our 1st that year and what?

My god…Cooley and Michkov wouldve been insane.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BiggE

VladDrag

Registered User
Feb 6, 2018
6,375
16,218
My god there is a bunch of waffle in here.


I guess it's Frost's fault that Foerster didn't elevate the puck when Frost found him wide open in the slot on the PP. :eyeroll:
There's a lot in here I could argue about, but I'll just say this. Charlie is stretching the truth, and ignoring other truths because he doesn't like Frost for one reason or another.
 

deadhead

Registered User
Feb 26, 2014
51,054
22,231
There's a lot in here I could argue about, but I'll just say this. Charlie is stretching the truth, and ignoring other truths because he doesn't like Frost for one reason or another.
I think he's just relaying what he's heard.

I don't get the impression they dislike Frost, this isn't a Hayes situation, more frustration with a talented young (but not so young anymore) player who hasn't taken the next step. I think Charlie's right that Frost, like a lot of skilled players, developed bad habits in the CHL where the windows are much wider, players slower and he could play a more deliberate game.

It's not just Frost, watching the Carolina game unfold, I got the feeling for a lot of young players (the 4th line was the only one to show up initially) the pressure from Carolina initially unnerved them, then as the game progressed they realized they could play at that pace and became more confident.
 

VladDrag

Registered User
Feb 6, 2018
6,375
16,218
I think he's just relaying what he's heard.
I'm not really talking about the position of Flyers, I'm talking about how he is attempting to minimize Frost's accomplishments last year. Talking about how 46 points in 81 games isn't 2C production. Of course it's not, but it's not as if he was deployed as a 2C for 81 full games last season. Ignores his ES positive ES scoring. Talking about how Frost didn't score in the PP last night, but ignoring that he lead the team in xGF/60 on the PP, and was involved in 2 or 3 PP chances. Talks about scattered turn overs, neglects to mention his line was the best in terms of shot suppression last night. Talking about how Cates only had 8 less points, neglects to mention the better deployment and linemates he got. Talks/eludes to superior defensive metrics for Cates, neglects to mention how poor offensively he was by those very same metrics (or how good frost was by those metrics). There's just so much in there that it's clear he has a bias against Frost.


I am not going to debate these things with you, either. I know you have a different opinion.
 

Curufinwe

Registered User
Feb 28, 2013
56,994
45,414
Charlie is either consciously or subconsciously engaging in the same nonsense the Couturier knockers did up until 2017. Like saying he was only a 3C in 16-17 because he scored 34 points, ignoring the fact that he only played 66 games, and that 31 of those points were at ES ranking him 2nd behind Voracek.


Remember the summer 2017 lineups that had Couturier playing behind Filppula and Patrick? :laugh:
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Rebels57

Magua

Entirely Palatable Product
Apr 25, 2016
38,674
161,095
Huron of the Lakes
I'm not really talking about the position of Flyers, I'm talking about how he is attempting to minimize Frost's accomplishments last year. Talking about how 46 points in 81 games isn't 2C production. Of course it's not, but it's not as if he was deployed as a 2C for 81 full games last season.

That’s arbitrary.

 

JojoTheWhale

"You should keep it." -- Striiker
May 22, 2008
35,893
110,940
That’s arbitrary.



Ok, I hate him now. Charlie has become the exact archetype that puts people off of numbers because they're so thoroughly unlikable. And I can't call them wrong for it.

It's not an exaggeration to say Bill James was such an unrepentant asshole that he actively hurt the growth of new metrics while still pushing them forward.
 

deadhead

Registered User
Feb 26, 2014
51,054
22,231
I'm not really talking about the position of Flyers, I'm talking about how he is attempting to minimize Frost's accomplishments last year. Talking about how 46 points in 81 games isn't 2C production. Of course it's not, but it's not as if he was deployed as a 2C for 81 full games last season. Ignores his ES positive ES scoring. Talking about how Frost didn't score in the PP last night, but ignoring that he lead the team in xGF/60 on the PP, and was involved in 2 or 3 PP chances. Talks about scattered turn overs, neglects to mention his line was the best in terms of shot suppression last night. Talking about how Cates only had 8 less points, neglects to mention the better deployment and linemates he got. Talks/eludes to superior defensive metrics for Cates, neglects to mention how poor offensively he was by those very same metrics (or how good frost was by those metrics). There's just so much in there that it's clear he has a bias against Frost.


I am not going to debate these things with you, either. I know you have a different opinion.
I find the comparisons between Cates and Frost to be silly, they're two different players with different styles, roles and skills. Comparing Cates and Laughton makes sense, or Frost with other offensive 2Cs around the league. Cates is not projected as a 2C, and hasn't been used as one.

Frost flashed 2C skills last season, and in the second half of last night's game, after he looked like shit the first two games. The problem is if you make him the 2C, and pay him like a 2C ($6+M on a long-term deal) you want to be sure he'll be a consistent 2C. They have a couple years before they have to make that decision.

There have been a number of centers who flashed for a season or two, then were never able to sustain that level of production. Some got paid off one or two years and couldn't replicate that performance.

Granlund is a good example
24: 45 ES points, 25: 45, 26: 32, 27: 23 (63g), 28: 20 (51g), 29: 36, 30: 29
Athanasiou
24: 43 ES points, 25: 19 (55g), 26: 22 (47g), 27: 14 (28g), 28: 33
Tyler Johnson
24: 55 ES points, 25: 25, 26: 28, 27: 35, 28: 38, 29: 24 (65g), 30: 19 (55g)
Stepan
22: 30 (48g) ES points, 23: 36, 24: 40, 25: 36, 26: 36, 27: 36, 28: 29, 29: 20

Charlie is simply wrong, I used 56 games b/c Dec 7 was when Torts settled on three lines that he played on a regular basis the rest of the season, and Frost clearly played better when he could develop chemistry with his linemates (so did Cates for that matter).
 
  • Like
Reactions: BernieParent

LegionOfDoom91

Registered User
Jan 25, 2013
83,374
143,418
Philadelphia, PA
Speaking of stats archetypes.....

5C4aVJ5.png


Not kidding, I cancelled my subscription after reading this comment. I hadn't looked at this shit in weeks anyway.

They don’t hate stats, they just like stats that don’t really tell you much of anything or just lack all context in figuring the total sum. Essentially whatever doesn’t have to make them think too hard.
 

Magua

Entirely Palatable Product
Apr 25, 2016
38,674
161,095
Huron of the Lakes
That’s arbitrary.



@VladDrag works very hard here, so I'll just save him the trouble of explaining:

sPvwVKl.png


Is "55 games" arbitrary? Sure, every sample cut-off is going to be slightly arbitrary. But for most of the first 2 months of the season, Frost was seeing similar all-situation ice time to a career 4th liner who bolted to the Czech league 1 month later. He was seeing less ice-time than MacEwen. There's a very specific reason why throwing out his first 15-20+ games is totally valid. Not to mention quality of linemates. Needing to include that sample to not be "arbitrary" is purposefully manipulative in its own right for its own reasons. Don't pretend it was a linear season, by the eye or numbers.
 
Last edited:

deadhead

Registered User
Feb 26, 2014
51,054
22,231
What makes a cutoff arbitrary is not being able to articulate the changes in the underlying model that justifies the cutoff.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BernieParent

Starat327

Top .01% OnlyHands
May 8, 2011
38,128
75,349
Philadelphia, Pa
@VladDrag works very hard here, so I'll just save him the trouble of explaining:

sPvwVKl.png


Is "55 games" arbitrary? Sure, every sample cut-off is going to be slightly arbitrary. But for most of the first 2 months of the season, Frost was seeing similar all-situation ice time to a career 4th liner who bolted to the Czech league 1 month later. He was seeing less ice-time than MacEwen. There's a very specific reason why throwing out his first 15-20+ games is totally valid. Not to mention quality of linemates. Needing to include that sample to not be "arbitrary" is purposefully manipulative in its own right for its own reasons. Don't pretend it was a linear season, by the eye or numbers.

Someone will come in and defend Charlie's position, without a doubt.
 

Beef Invictus

Revolutionary Positivity
Dec 21, 2009
130,488
171,200
Armored Train
I think he's just relaying what he's heard.

I don't get the impression they dislike Frost, this isn't a Hayes situation, more frustration with a talented young (but not so young anymore) player who hasn't taken the next step. I think Charlie's right that Frost, like a lot of skilled players, developed bad habits in the CHL where the windows are much wider, players slower and he could play a more deliberate game.

It's not just Frost, watching the Carolina game unfold, I got the feeling for a lot of young players (the 4th line was the only one to show up initially) the pressure from Carolina initially unnerved them, then as the game progressed they realized they could play at that pace and became more confident.

The coach has all but screamed his hatred of Frost, and we know Flahr agreed with him.
 

deadhead

Registered User
Feb 26, 2014
51,054
22,231
The coach has all but screamed his hatred of Frost, and we know Flahr agreed with him.
No he hasn't, compare his comments about Frost with his comments about Hayes.
Hayes wouldn't play defense at center, and fought a move to wing. Torts gave up on him.

Torts is trying to push Frost into taking his game to the next level.
Whether Frost is the type you can push, or whether he needs the kid glove treatment remains to be seen.
 

Beef Invictus

Revolutionary Positivity
Dec 21, 2009
130,488
171,200
Armored Train
No he hasn't, compare his comments about Frost with his comments about Hayes.
Hayes wouldn't play defense at center, and fought a move to wing. Torts gave up on him.

Torts is trying to push Frost into taking his game to the next level.
Whether Frost is the type you can push, or whether he needs the kid glove treatment remains to be seen.

Did you know it is possible for Tortorella to dislike Frost without disliking him as much as Hayes?

I don't remember him ever calling Hayes a toilet seat. I do remember him treating saying anything even neutral about Frost like he's having his nipples burned off, while having no such issues praising others.

You insist on doing this weird thing where you ignore everything Tortorella says and does, and instead pretend that your imagined fantasizing about him is what he really is.
 

deadhead

Registered User
Feb 26, 2014
51,054
22,231
Did you know it is possible for Tortorella to dislike Frost without disliking him as much as Hayes?

I don't remember him ever calling Hayes a toilet seat. I do remember him treating saying anything even neutral about Frost like he's having his nipples burned off, while having no such issues praising others.
He didn't call Frost a toilet seat, he was commenting on Frost's inconsistent play, which was up and down "like a toilet seat." Maybe not the best choice of words, but he got his point across.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad