wankstifier
All glory to the harvest god
- Jun 19, 2018
- 7,977
- 11,399
i don’t love this answer. Why don’t they have a line of communication?
I don't see any issue with saying, "NCAA rules preclude a player from attending more than one development camp, and Cutter attended last year so he is ineligible to attend. We extended an invite as a matter of courtesy, but he understandably declined." While I realize it might be a bit much to assume of this fanbase, I can't see that upsetting many people.It's possible that it was a communication issue but IMO it's more likely that Briere just didn't want to blow up Gauthier's spot for not paying our of his own pocket to attend the camp.
He really does need to work on his responses and interactions with the media though.
It's possible that it was a communication issue but IMO it's more likely that Briere just didn't want to blow up Gauthier's spot for not paying our of his own pocket to attend the camp.
He really does need to work on his responses and interactions with the media though.
It definitely a teachable moment, I think all NCAA players attended last year so I never heard how to deal with it. It should have been a quick standard line. "NCAA rules dictate that players get one free camp after that it's on their dime. He attended last year and he is unable to attend this year due to the financial obligation. We extended an invite as a matter of courtesy, but he understandably declined."I don't see any issue with saying, "NCAA rules preclude a player from attending more than one development camp, and Cutter attended last year so he is ineligible to attend. We extended an invite as a matter of courtesy, but he understandably declined." While I realize it might be a bit much to assume of this fanbase, I can't see that upsetting many people.
Maybe the FO just doesn't understand the rules.
It's possible that it was a communication issue but IMO it's more likely that Briere just didn't want to blow up Gauthier's spot for not paying our of his own pocket to attend the camp.
He really does need to work on his responses and interactions with the media though.
Back in the top 3! Woohoo prospects! I don’t think I’d rank the Flyers there but at least it’s backed up
Note he’s including York as a prospect
Dreger was on VAN radio today saying PHI called WPG/VAN to take Sanheim. They told WPG they’d take the negative value Schmidt deal but WPG said no. There was also the willingness to take Krug’s liability.
Just curious as to whether the fanbase feels the same about Sanheim or if the fanbase views him as a legitimate top four matchup guy with no signs of slowing down.
I wish they'd retire that number. It's too triggeringYork is apparently wearing #8 this year. Lot to live up to.
It’s being heavily propped up by the goalie ranking I think, but yeah there are several prospect pools that are better IMO.Hard to see a pool with Brink and Andrae in the top 5 as being the third best in the league
Back in the top 3! Woohoo prospects! I don’t think I’d rank the Flyers there but at least it’s backed up
Note he’s including York as a prospect
Back in the top 3! Woohoo prospects! I don’t think I’d rank the Flyers there but at least it’s backed up
Note he’s including York as a prospect
Having the 2nd best prospect in the world will do that for a team lol
Have to think Mete is AHL fodder.
Another year, another time Desnoyers was penciled into the lineup, and another year he won’t be.