TobanWest
Registered User
- Jan 28, 2020
- 1,628
- 2,503
For sure he isn't a 1 for 1 replacement but i see Lohrei as being the better dman moving forward
Boston Bruins 2023-24 Roster and Salary Cap Discussion XI: Trade Deadline March 8th
- Thread starter smithformeragent
- Start date
-
Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
- Status
Is Kulak really any different than Forbort other than he has 2 more years at 2.75 million that I don't want. I don't see the point of that swap. I guess maybe he is healthier, but I don;t want 2 more years of basically the same guy at almost the same price.
And then we get Foegle who does hit, but otherwise is a worse hockey player than JDB
MarchysNoseKnows
Big Hat No Cattle
- Feb 14, 2018
- 10,307
- 20,848
They don’t play the same role and certainly not the same side. It’s a comparison that doesn’t do anything.
If you see the words Jimmy Murphy…run away…
Bruinfanatic
Registered User
Eddie Munson
This year is my year. I can feel it. ‘86 baby!
- Jul 11, 2008
- 6,781
- 2,235
If this is the best offer we get for Debrusk then I keep him and lose him for nothing which is literally equal to the value of what he returns in that trade.
It also doesn't work against the cap unless Boston retains well over 1 million
I'd argue getting stuck with the Kulak contract for 2 years means it is a negative value deal
the issue here is the site calls itself ‘rumors’ where in fact its content stipulates’proposal’.
click bait
AngryMilkcrates
End of an Era
- Jun 4, 2016
- 17,967
- 29,224
Allan Mitchell of The Athletic has proposed the following four-player trade that would get DeBrusk to his hometown Edmonton Oilers:
Edmonton Oilers Receive:
- Jake DeBrusk
- Derek Forbort
- Brett Kulak
- Warren Foegele
Seems like a trade made from the mind of someone wanting to get Jake to EDM. This is not a good trade for Boston unless Jake refuses to resign. Even then I would think there would be better offers. However, according to Dom all current offers for Jake are the usual Lowball ones we hear about every few years.
Absurdity
light switch connoisseur
- Jul 6, 2012
- 11,899
- 8,995
If he's not moved, DeBrusk should skate with Frederic and Geekie who are both more north-south players. Maybe they can create more room for him on the ice.
Absurdity
light switch connoisseur
- Jul 6, 2012
- 11,899
- 8,995
Edmonton would be over the cap by $1M so it doesn't work.
IF Martin Necas available , at trade deadline or at draft, the Bruins should be ALL over this! Apparently wants a huge pay increase. Canes wont be able to pay the money he is demanding.
Sheppy
NeelyDan eats corn the long way
With the $$$ the Bruins will have at the end of this season, #1C is a #1 priority. Just imagine Pasta with a legit #1.
As mentioned above. Doesn't work with cap unless Boston retains.
And Boston walks away stuck with Kulak for 2 more years at 2.75 million per year. And he might be a good #6, but with lohrei and other places to find a bottom pairing defenseman at closer to the minumum, boston can't afford to have a 2.75 million guy hanging around down there
nico sturm (SJ) - faceoff win % sitting at 59.5%. need to start winning a big face off late in teh 3rd. should be a target come deadline day. owed 2 million next season. figure it out.
Sheppy
NeelyDan eats corn the long way
I'd take a guy like Olivier as a 13th forward that you can toss into some games down the stretch. Could be a low risk guy that ends up being a regular on your 4th line.
bruinmann77
Registered User
- Mar 2, 2015
- 1,347
- 3,047
Would love this guy ...unfortunately IMO we'd have to give up Lohrei, Lysell, + to be in the conversation
remer
Registered User
- Oct 18, 2005
- 5,864
- 1,845
Unfortunately, last year they gave away a lot of draft picks and did not retain any of the three players. A very costly event for a 1st round exit.
2024 1st round pick & 2025 4th round pick......................Bertuzzi
2023 1st round pick , 2023 5th round pick , 2024 3rd round pick
& 2025 2nd round pick............for Orlov and Hathaway
They made mistakes in the past with not selling off UFA's Eriksson, Chara, Krug, etc and when you don't replenish draft picks it puts the team in a difficult position to improve. This might be the year to cash in on a few. Grzelcyk, DeBrusk, JVR, Forbort, Henien, Richard, Shattenkirk, Zboril are all UFA's. Many can be replaced with better options. Replenish some draft capital or trade to find a top center.
2024 1st round pick & 2025 4th round pick......................Bertuzzi
2023 1st round pick , 2023 5th round pick , 2024 3rd round pick
& 2025 2nd round pick............for Orlov and Hathaway
They made mistakes in the past with not selling off UFA's Eriksson, Chara, Krug, etc and when you don't replenish draft picks it puts the team in a difficult position to improve. This might be the year to cash in on a few. Grzelcyk, DeBrusk, JVR, Forbort, Henien, Richard, Shattenkirk, Zboril are all UFA's. Many can be replaced with better options. Replenish some draft capital or trade to find a top center.
Last edited:
Not if Ulmark is involved
The Bruins will Rue the day if they trade Lohrie...just sayin
first I doubt he’s available. But even so the plus you need to add is $3M contract just so he would fit on Bs Cap.
- Mar 2, 2015
- 1,347
- 3,047
Sorry, should have clarified, I was referring to off season not trade deadline...no way would Carolina remove him for this years run
RatKing
Registered User
- Jan 26, 2023
- 39
- 71
- Status
