Says who? You know this how? You know who else is a really bad pairing? Forbort and Shattenkirk, Forbort and Mitchell stinks too. Forbort basically with anyone isn't great.
Anyways, that's kinda my point. Say it's a bad idea because of "x"....Cap space.....Bad fit without other changes....that kind of stuff. It's amazing that this Bruins 4th line and 3rd pairing is so good, nothing ever suggested here is an upgrade or good idea for some
Forbort and Lubs are two of the worst puck movers in the game. Put them together and the Bruins are stuck in their zone the whole time. It's not rocket science. Add to that that you need to clear out a real NHL salary to fit Lubs. Likely either Forbort or Gryz.
If you are moving out Forbort, you look like this:
Gryz McAvoy
Lindhom Carlo
Lorhei Lubs
So to add Lubs bit of physicality, you are now playing Lorhei on the PK and if you have an injury in the D group on the left side you suddenly have Zboril in the lineup.
If you move out Gryz...
Lorhei McAvoy
Lindholm Carlo
Forbort Lubs
So now you have Lorhei on the first pairing and on the #2PK, with Zboril as his backup. And you have the worst picking moving bottom pairing in the game.
And even worse, with McAvoy and Carlo already on RD, you aren't really gaining much ok the PK with Lubs as a RD, which is a good hunk of his value.
Now... if there are more moves involved, maybe its interesting...
Lindhom McAvoy
Hanifin Carlo
Lorhei Lubs
Ok, that's interesting. But Lubs is the secondary move there.
Its just not thought out and then when people call other posters out for not offering solutions instead of pointing out the the original poster didn't ACTUALLY offer a solution, it gets annoying.