91Fedorov91
Registered User
Can we trade one of our goalies for a top 6 d man
A top 6 dman that’s better than what we have? Doubt it.Can we trade one of our goalies for a top 6 d man
Askarov could do it lolA top 6 dman that’s better than what we have? Doubt it.
Can't be that hard to find someone better than Thrun and Benning.A top 6 dman that’s better than what we have? Doubt it.
neither of them are that bad. Eh actually Benning I don’t know maybe. Thrun has shown potential but Benning has been terrible to start the year. The injury definitely affected him. I’d waive him for Shakir when he’s healthy.Can't be that hard to find someone better than Thrun and Benning.
Benning is that bad. But I don't want to give up on Thrun before seeing him on a half-way decent team with a half-way decent partner.neither of them are that bad. Eh actually Benning I don’t know maybe. Thrun has shown potential but Benning has been terrible to start the year. The injury definitely affected him. I’d waive him for Shakir when he’s healthy.
Remember when he got 8 hours a night and went ppg at like 38? Yeah fortnite ended thatIf he weren't addicted to Fortnite he would have a Cup ring!!! /s
Thrun has certainly been struggling, which is frustrating, but you also see the glimmers of potential there: some good skating, the kind of tape-to-tape passes you see so rarely from other Sharks D, the pleasantly surprising offensive instincts on occasion when he's on the PP.Thrun looked pretty good in the first couple of games and had two pretty rough ones but yeah, I’d love to see him with Muhk or like, anyone other than Benning.
It’s really annoying that both years injuries to key guys stopped us from seeing what the full lineup might be like. I really hope we get Shakir and Celebrini (and Eklund obviously) back soon, it would make a world of difference.
I will be 100% honest I’d take shockingly unremarkable over shocking play that is being shown by the rest of our defense.There is nothing special about Henry Thrun, he is shockingly unremarkable
This is exactly what I saw from Thrun last year - he just doesn't have a single plus skill, and you need something to succeed as anything save replacement-level filler. I think Thrun tops out as a #6, but more realistically as a #7 or AHL depth.Last season, Thrun struggled to make plays with little time and space. His physical tools are unremarkable, and he doesn't have great vision.
I'd hoped to see some progression and improvement on this areas, but so far there's been nothing. I still think Thrun could carve out a career as a bottom-pairing guy, but he needs to improve considerably or make big changes to his game to go to the next step.
Walman clearsI will be 100% honest I’d take shockingly unremarkable over shocking play that is being shown by the rest of our defense.
I’ve been very unimpressed by Walman. If Thrun can find any sort of offensive game I’d take him over WalmanWalman clears
Walman is the best puck moving defenseman we've had in two years, he's also surprisingly adequate in an overmateched role while being deployed as our #1 shutdown D and paired with Cody Ceci when he shouldn't be any higher than a second pairI’ve been very unimpressed by Walman. If Thrun can find any sort of offensive game I’d take him over Walman