Speculation: 2023-24-25 Sharks Roster Discussion

OrrNumber4

Registered User
Jul 25, 2002
16,894
6,413


Ferraro, Duclair, Labanc

Duclair for a mid-round pick seems likely. Ferraro, if the Sharks want to trade him, should be able to get a first-round pick + a decent asset.

Labanc is a candidate to sign a prove-it deal (with another team, of course) in the offseason and blossom. I imagine teams see him as a costlier, more one-dimensional version of Alexander Barabanov.

If there's no market for Barabanov, it might make sense for the Sharks to sign him for another year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan

tiburon12

Registered User
Jul 18, 2009
5,124
5,225
Duclair for a mid-round pick seems likely. Ferraro, if the Sharks want to trade him, should be able to get a first-round pick + a decent asset.

Labanc is a candidate to sign a prove-it deal (with another team, of course) in the offseason and blossom. I imagine teams see him as a costlier, more one-dimensional version of Alexander Barabanov.

If there's no market for Barabanov, it might make sense for the Sharks to sign him for another year.
If the Pens ship out Guentzel i can see them bringing in Barabanov (and probably another piece too, probably not from SJ). I think his and Crosby's style would match and of course he was already great with Karl
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan

hohosaregood

Banned
Sep 1, 2011
33,244
13,981

New idea. Hertl for Jiricek before Columbus clears house over the summer. Would be a pretty good fit with Fantilli, Gaudreau, Voronkov, etc.
 

Sharksrule04

Registered User
Jul 23, 2010
3,710
1,259
New York, NY
Since the first lockout, here are the teams (OTTOMH) that didn't have a Norris-quality d-man on their team:

1996 Avalanche (Ozolinsh/Foote)
2004 Lightning (Boyle)
2006 Hurricanes (F. Kaberle)
2009 (barely, with Gonchar/Letang) and 2017 Penguins (Schultz)
2019 Blues (Pietrangelo, again borderline)
2023 VGK (Pietrangelo)

The Avalanche had Roy, Forsberg, and Sakic
The Lightning had Khabibulin, St. Louis, and Richards
The Hurricanes had Eric Staal and Cam Ward
The Penguins had Crosby, Malkin, arguably Gonchar, and later Kessel
The Blues had O'Reilly
The VGK had Stone, Eichel, and, arguably, Adin Hill given his performance in the playoffs and this year.

You can go back even further, and since WW2, only the 73-75 Flyers and the 1993 Canadiens don't have a Norris-quality defenseman.

So if you want to win without a Norris-quality defenseman, you better have superstars elsewhere.
O’Reilly, superstar? No and neither was Cam Ward. I wouldn’t confuse a hot run with being a “superstar”. I know it doesn’t fit the whole “magic formula for winning a cup” theme but sometimes decent or good players just get hot at the right time.
 

coooldude

Registered User
Sponsor
Jul 25, 2007
4,626
5,828
O’Reilly, superstar? No and neither was Cam Ward. I wouldn’t confuse a hot run with being a “superstar”. I know it doesn’t fit the whole “magic formula for winning a cup” theme but sometimes decent or good players just get hot at the right time.
The blues had: Tarasenko (16OA), Pietrangelo (4OA), Bouwmeester (3OA), and to a lesser extent, Perron (late first) and O'Reilly (33OA), plus Parayko. So they still had top 5 pick talent, and yet they are an outlier for not being like the other teams who consistently contend and win in the cap era with even more top 5 talent.

There is no magic formula for building a contender, but the contenders all have a lot of home grown top 5-10 picks that hit, and then they add pieces. Full rebuilds in the cap era have about a 50% chance of success, and the other 50% is pretty ugly. Halfway there rebuilds like the blues have a lot lower rate of success.
 

OrrNumber4

Registered User
Jul 25, 2002
16,894
6,413
O’Reilly, superstar? No and neither was Cam Ward. I wouldn’t confuse a hot run with being a “superstar”. I know it doesn’t fit the whole “magic formula for winning a cup” theme but sometimes decent or good players just get hot at the right time.
If I grant your analysis of O'Reilly and Ward, that means that four teams out of 78 won a cup without at least two superstars, and, orthogonal to that point and relevant to acquiring Jiricek, 10/78 lacked a Norris-quality dman.
 

gaucholoco3

Registered User
Jun 22, 2015
1,522
1,953
Jiricek would be amazing to get. I think the Sharks could put together a very competitive package that doesn’t hurt the Sharks rebuild but also gives incredible value to Columbus.

Jiricek for Sharks 2024 1st (top 1 protected)

For Columbus they get at least a 75% chance at a top 4 pick and 25% chance of the Sharks 2025 1st unprotected.

For Sharks they get a better prospect than anyone they would draft 2-4 this draft. If they win the lottery and draft Celebrini the risk of giving up a potential #1 overall pick is diminished because they would already have Celebrini and Smith so the need for Hagens would be less.

Also if the Sharks draft Celebrini it would instantly incentivize the team to start building a winner without their 25 1st. In this scenario back up a brinks truck for Hanifin.

Couture - Celebrini - Musty
Hertl - Smith - Eklund
Guschin/Duclair/FA - Granlund - Zetterlund

Hanifin - Jiricek
Muk - Emberson
Ferraro/Thrun - Benning

While maybe not a cup team this team is young with potential and would have still have cap space even with Vlassic buried in the AHL.

I would also like to draft Jiricek with the Pens pick and he could start with the Cuda next year.

If the Sharks don’t win the lottery they could keep Smith in college only sign UFA rentals and tank for Hagens.
 

spintops

Registered User
Sep 13, 2013
1,772
1,176

New idea. Hertl for Jiricek before Columbus clears house over the summer. Would be a pretty good fit with Fantilli, Gaudreau, Voronkov, etc.
I think Hertl gets moved this off-season if there is a market, which I never thought before.. maybe Greir's comments made him realize we are years away from even pushing from a wild card spot.
 

Stewie Griffin

What the deuce
May 9, 2019
5,348
8,741
Canada
Hertl's term is too long. I could see Couture moved this offseason (or when Burns retention comes off the next year).

I don't think we're the team with the assets for Jiricek unless we can convince them to accept Eklund for him, which I doubt. I think Grier keeps his guys (aka 2024 first and Smith).

We're about 1-1.5 years away from making a big trade where we're the buyer.
 

Le Rosbeef

Registered User
Jul 27, 2007
3,545
1,058
Jiricek would be amazing to get. I think the Sharks could put together a very competitive package that doesn’t hurt the Sharks rebuild but also gives incredible value to Columbus.

Jiricek for Sharks 2024 1st (top 1 protected)

For Columbus they get at least a 75% chance at a top 4 pick and 25% chance of the Sharks 2025 1st unprotected.

Interesting proposal. Jiricek would be a terrific add.

If it turns into Hagens next year, how would we feel if Celebrini is a Shark? I can't make my mind up.
 

Friday

Registered User
Apr 25, 2014
5,998
4,080
LA
I love Hertl, Im sure we all love Hertl but gotta question a talented hockey player who's willing to waste his prime + in a long rebuild. His contract extension was so bad, not sure what either side was thinking. I hope he wants out and I hope MG can get real value outta moving him.
 

STL Shark

Registered User
Mar 6, 2013
4,408
5,476
Sounds like Hertl wants out. I don't care what we get back, the only priority should be dumping the entire contract with no retention.
Reuniting with PDB and Pavs in Dallas would seem to be a good fit for him. Benn's deal expires next year which would be $1.35M of cap savings swapping him for Hertl (in addition to getting a better player).
 

Cas

Conversational Black Hole
Sponsor
Jun 23, 2020
5,976
8,657
I love Hertl, Im sure we all love Hertl but gotta question a talented hockey player who's willing to waste his prime + in a long rebuild. His contract extension was so bad, not sure what either side was thinking. I hope he wants out and I hope MG can get real value outta moving him.
I don't think "wanting to stay with the team he's always played for" says anything about a player.

I'm rather worried about Hertl because he's very slow (one of the 20-30 slowest forwards in the league) and only getting older, but thats separate from being worried that he accepted a big long-term contrqct with his original team.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Friday

Hodge

Registered User
Apr 27, 2021
6,860
8,173
Reuniting with PDB and Pavs in Dallas would seem to be a good fit for him. Benn's deal expires next year which would be $1.35M of cap savings swapping him for Hertl (in addition to getting a better player).
Would love to get Dellandrea out of there if possible. Seems like he's fallen out of favor.
 

Friday

Registered User
Apr 25, 2014
5,998
4,080
LA
I don't think "wanting to stay with the team he's always played for" says anything about a player.

I'm rather worried about Hertl because he's very slow (one of the 20-30 slowest forwards in the league) and only getting older, but thats separate from being worried that he accepted a big long-term contrqct with his original team.
I think it says a lot about his competitive drive. But I do understand your point
 

Hodge

Registered User
Apr 27, 2021
6,860
8,173
No other team would have offered Hertl $65 million. I can't blame him for taking the money. That contract is solely on Hasso and the Sharks.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chinaski89

one2gamble

Registered User
Dec 24, 2007
17,553
8,873
If they can move him without any retention they should. I love the man but they should not have signed him at this point in the rebuild.

Hes honestly playing some pretty good hockey and I do wonder if moving him actually helps or hurts the rebuild.
 

one2gamble

Registered User
Dec 24, 2007
17,553
8,873
Interesting proposal. Jiricek would be a terrific add.

If it turns into Hagens next year, how would we feel if Celebrini is a Shark? I can't make my mind up.
This is why I dont know if I do that. There is about a 98% the sharks are in the lottery next year as well. If it could revert to the pens 1st and our 2nd or something else instead of the higher 1st the year after, pull the trigger.

I honestly dont understand why CB struggles so much to build a team. Do they want Hertl.....
 

coooldude

Registered User
Sponsor
Jul 25, 2007
4,626
5,828
This is why I dont know if I do that. There is about a 98% the sharks are in the lottery next year as well. If it could revert to the pens 1st and our 2nd or something else instead of the higher 1st the year after, pull the trigger.

I honestly dont understand why CB struggles so much to build a team. Do they want Hertl.....
CBJ seems to be suffering from Jarmo management issues. Great talent evaluation, horrible roster and prospect management, wouldn't be surprised if the front office is also a mess. Just getting this from the CBJ threads and all the noise in the media.
 

landshark

They'll paint the donkey teal if you pay.
Sponsor
Mar 15, 2003
3,801
3,223
outer richmond dist
Reuniting with PDB and Pavs in Dallas would seem to be a good fit for him. Benn's deal expires next year which would be $1.35M of cap savings swapping him for Hertl (in addition to getting a better player).
haha Benn finishing out his career on rebuilding Sharks team would be comical.
 

Juxtaposer

Outro: Divina Comedia
Dec 21, 2009
50,381
24,691
Bay Area
Does everyone wanting to trade Hertl also want to become Buffalo or Ottawa? You need quality vets around during your rebuild to help instill good habits and insulate young players.

If Hertl requests out or if someone’s giving us actual value, then that’s a different thing, but moving him just to move him is insane.
 

Sendhelplease

Registered User
Dec 21, 2020
476
1,018
I'd rather keep hold of Hertl at this point I think. We've cleared enough money off the books I am not worried about his contract long term. I also think that Hertl's style of play should help him age better than most players, he is already slow so he knows how to be a good player while being a slower player, his skill of puck protection should not be affected too much and he is a smart enough player. I also think it is valuable to have the vets around who are at least decent so that Eklund, Smith, and our 2024 pick will have someone other than Luke Kunin to pass to. If someone offers us actual value for Hertl than my opinion may change but for now I think we should keep him.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad