CaleMakaw
Registered User
- Jul 12, 2018
- 418
- 379
With Richard 88 retired, I figured I'd take a crack at the old armchair. Flame away.
Duchene is not currently a center, but played it in the past… he also isn’t capable of the role anymore. Just because a player played one way, years ago prior to injuries and age… doesn’t mean they can continue to play that way.He is not currently a center for AZ. He has capably played the position previously, I remember watching him in Chicago look damn good there, for example.
Except he sucks at faceoffs.
For guys they don’t want to move, you’d have to pay up. On the side of them choosing to win this year, odds are against that decision with the organizational issues right now. Maybe those get solved in a month, but I tend to doubt it.I don't think it would cost that much. Not more than the player is worth, but certainly more than you may like to pay.
You're absolutely right, Arizona really doesn't have any motivation. The only motivation they have is when Armstrong determines it is time to move on from tanking and actually start putting together a roster. I think Toews would certainly interest in that situation. But I don't think Bill is done accumulating high draft picks yet, so...
Here's the thing though, Montreal wasn't shopping Lehkonen either. They had no motivation to move him. Joe Sakic just wouldn't shut up about it and they finally relented. Once CMac has determined his target for center, I expect him to get a deal done. It won't be cheap no matter who it is.
Anyways, this is CMac's team now, it'll be interesting to see what he does this summer. I have a feeling it won't be anything like what I want to happen, but I also know there is probably a very good reason Joe Sakic hired CMac and not me as a successor.
Oh I agree. Sakic wasn’t flawless to begin. Cmac could work into a genius for all I know. But it’s not as easy to forgive Cmac’s first year because he managed a team that was capable of winning a cup in the middle of a very small window.95% of people here were calling for Sakic’s head his first 3 or so years here as well. Yes it was a bad year and they didn’t go all in, but give the guy a chance to settle in. Even though he worked on a lot of stuff with Sakic, he’s likely got a lot more to learn as a GM, just like Sakic did.
Very small window what???Oh I agree. Sakic wasn’t flawless to begin. Cmac could work into a genius for all I know. But it’s not as easy to forgive Cmac’s first year because he managed a team that was capable of winning a cup in the middle of a very small window.
It's possible the Avs are not really contending next season. A lot depends on the moves they make and if Landeskog is any good when he comes back.Very small window what???
Sorry but that's just dumb. I don't know what else to say. You have some of the best players in the entire sport in your team and you can't even contend? Bullshit. They can and they will.It's possible the Avs are not really contending next season. A lot depends on the moves they make and if Landeskog is any good when he comes back.
Not without depth they won't, just like this season. A lot depends on CMac making solid moves and acting like a GM of a contender, nobody knows if that happens.Sorry but that's just dumb. I don't know what else to say. You have some of the best players in the entire sport in your team and you can't even contend? Bullshit. They can and they will.
They did contend this season though. Contending doesn't mean you win. Even the best team in the league only has like a 1/5 chance to win. (E: Even 1/5 is too high TBH, closer to 1/10 but over it)Not without depth they won't, just like this season. A lot depends on CMac making solid moves and acting like a GM of a contender, nobody knows if that happens.
The Avs contending depended on a decent deadline. After the CMac horror show the team was done, there just wasn't enough depth to make a run at the cup.They did contend this season though. Contending doesn't mean you win. Even the best team in the league only has like a 1/5 chance to win. (E: Even 1/5 is too high TBH, closer to 1/10 but over it)
Hoo boy here we go
Avs should figure out a way to get Matthews. Sans MacK and Makar… everything else is on the table. Give them Rants and Byram.
I can not wait to watch the incoherent mass of Toronto fans turn on Matthews in the next 12 months.
Good lord how do the Avs sell this new Toronto 'bite' GM on an extended Toews. Toews + Newhook + 1st.
The cap would be hell but waves of MacKinnon/Makar and Matthews/Byram would be a nightmare to play against.
They’ll convince them to take Manson in the deal
Looking at Matthew's contract situation. Boy he is really going to have Toronto over a barrel with that NMC if they don't trade him before July 1st.
Dubas strikes again.
Truculence!They’ll convince them to take Manson in the deal
So Arizona is in turmoil, Toronto has to make changes, sounds like Winnipeg is making a purge, shaping up to be a decent buyers' market.
Truculence!
So Arizona is in turmoil, Toronto has to make changes, sounds like Winnipeg is making a purge, shaping up to be a decent buyers' market.
Like Kadri, Saad, Burakovsky, Toews, Kuemper, Nuke and Lehkonen?The Avs will end up getting a bunch of over the hill role players while paying each one 250k too much
Sadly yes.He'd fit right in
Ok, first, Schmaltz is 5 years younger than Duchene, he's 27. I don't think that comparison works on the age level at all.Duchene is not currently a center, but played it in the past… he also isn’t capable of the role anymore. Just because a player played one way, years ago prior to injuries and age… doesn’t mean they can continue to play that way.
Schmaltz has shown zero ability in the last few seasons to play a top 6 center role. It is a huge risk of assets and a season to acquire a guy who hasn’t shown the ability. He’s a great wing, and there is value in that… he just does nothing to solve the 2C issue. He’d just be another guy in the ‘maybe it could work’ realm. Personally, not a fan of that option in a short Cup window.
I mean finding a guy that legitimately plays the position should be the first requirement.Sadly yes.
Ok, first, Schmaltz is 5 years younger than Duchene, he's 27. I don't think that comparison works on the age level at all.
Other than that, a younger Duchene isn't a terrible comparison as a guy that can play both positions, though the talent level and profile is different. Guys like Marleau and Duchene on teams with center depth or even just guys that only work at center will shift to wing. Hell it happened here, RoR and Mack played wing for Stastny and Duchene for extended periods because we had a glut of centers and they worked best at wing. That didn't make Mack or RoR incapable of being centers again, it just meant they are also good at wing.
It is indeed a risk, but guess what, that's where this team is at. The cubbard is bare. The roster and star power are stacked in many ways but bad luck with Newhook, Landy, and Nuke has put us in the position of needing to fill holes in the top 6 without shedding talent. These are exactly the kinds of bets you have to make in this position: find an underutilized asset languishing somewhere and aquire them on the cheap.
I dunno if it's exactly Schmaltz, but y'all can keep dreaming about Crosby and Matthews and Lindholm and Bennett. Those guys have critical roles on their current (good) teams. The idea those assets would come at the kind of cost the Avs could pay while maintaining the rest of the core is laughable. The Avs have to find an option between the pipe dreams of Lindholms and the hopium of Monahans. Guys like Schmaltz are that class of asset.
Sadly yes.
Ok, first, Schmaltz is 5 years younger than Duchene, he's 27. I don't think that comparison works on the age level at all.
Other than that, a younger Duchene isn't a terrible comparison as a guy that can play both positions, though the talent level and profile is different. Guys like Marleau and Duchene on teams with center depth or even just guys that only work at center will shift to wing. Hell it happened here, RoR and Mack played wing for Stastny and Duchene for extended periods because we had a glut of centers and they worked best at wing. That didn't make Mack or RoR incapable of being centers again, it just meant they are also good at wing.
It is indeed a risk, but guess what, that's where this team is at. The cubbard is bare. The roster and star power are stacked in many ways but bad luck with Newhook, Landy, and Nuke has put us in the position of needing to fill holes in the top 6 without shedding talent. These are exactly the kinds of bets you have to make in this position: find an underutilized asset languishing somewhere and aquire them on the cheap.
I dunno if it's exactly Schmaltz, but y'all can keep dreaming about Crosby and Matthews and Lindholm and Bennett. Those guys have critical roles on their current (good) teams. The idea those assets would come at the kind of cost the Avs could pay while maintaining the rest of the core is laughable. The Avs have to find an option between the pipe dreams of Lindholms and the hopium of Monahans. Guys like Schmaltz are that class of asset.
Like Kadri, Saad, Burakovsky, Toews, Kuemper, Nuke and Lehkonen?
Bunch of geezers!
Makar was brutally bad in that Blues series.This is not true. When Makar went down this season and the Avs had Toews/Byram/Girard in the lineup Bednar did not gravitate towards moving Girard. More often than not it was Byram shifting to the right.
Bednar realized Girard is even worse playing the right side and stopped moving him there.
He left money on the table to re sign with the AvsI mean Nuke taking 49mil after having 1 season of top 6 play(and one good post season)is as market value as it gets.