BaconNater
Registered User
Always great making trades for players who weren't hot on the rumor mill, trying to predict who CMac is after next with one of the 1sts
Pairing him with two guys that have high motors will raise his and insulate when it isn't there for him.LOC needs to go back to playing like a maniac for this to work. When he only works harder than 75% of the league he's a pretty mid bottom sixer.
IMO, I would try and use one of them to get another good player that can play now, and use the other to draft a playerSo what’s the consensus on our two firsts? Package them to move up? Use one for a top 6 winger? Use both for a really good top 6 winger?
I can't shut up and I can't stop using words I love!I'm still running across words on this forum that I've never seen before! I'm not doing logorrhea
That's true, and maybe on a fourth line he'd be fine, but I think every forward needs to hit about 15 points or they won't stick.I wasn't thinking we'd need points from him, just keep the offensively gifted players off the PK and make the 4th line hard to play against. Also, have experienced NHL players on the 4th line.
I don't love the names that people keep bringing up. Laughton (at the price that's been rumored), Duclair, Garland... They really need to swing for a bigger piece somehow.
And nammerus has gone silent suddenly......
No, worse.Would Laughtonen, Duclairenen, and Garlanden make it better for you?
Did our whole 4th line hit 15? hahahaa. It's going to be a cheap 4th line again I think, but there are useful guys out there. We're too busy catching medium fish at the moment.That's true, and maybe on a fourth line he'd be fine, but I think every forward needs to hit about 15 points or they won't stick.
I mean we don’t really need play driving wingers though. Mack’s driving the top line. And Nuke and Mikko are likely driving the 2nd line. All we need is a dude who can hang in the top 6 and put the puck in the net really.I guess that's true. I see him as too much of a complimentary piece on a line. It could be old reputation or automatically attributing that to a winger for the Panthers.
Did our whole 4th line hit 15? hahahaa. It's going to be a cheap 4th line again I think, but there are useful guys out there. We're too busy catching medium fish at the moment.
Depends on the 4C and 3RD spots. Meyers and Pavel are guys who will push for the 4C spot (Meyers maybe at the wing) and Malinski could step into the RD spot if the Avs don't insualte the spot. If the Avs make moves to cover those spots with NHLers today, I think they'd be injury callups.@henchman21 do you see any of the college UDFAs earning a spot next year? Including Meyers in this discussion.
That doesn't mean I can't dislike all of those wingers we've ever had.I mean we don’t really need play driving wingers though. Mack’s driving the top line. And Nuke and Mikko are likely driving the 2nd line. All we need is a dude who can hang in the top 6 and put the puck in the net really.
No, and now all of the ones who didn't are gone.Did our whole 4th line hit 15? hahahaa. It's going to be a cheap 4th line again I think, but there are useful guys out there. We're too busy catching medium fish at the moment.
You know, I forgot about him, thanks. We have to do better than Blidh, Sedlak et al this time around. Helm being hurt also ruined things at the bottom 6.I think we are all going to be pleasantly surprised with olofssson. Guy has a motor and should add to the plethora of hard forechecking players we have.
Well he's definitely not a third liner.Lehky Nate mikko
Konecny RyJo Nuke
Kiviranta Colton Allison
??? ??? LOC
Keep him and his pizza away.Leave room for Puljujarvi in your mock line-ups. Please and thank you.
Why is there an obsession over this guy? I get he's an analytical darling, but the dude flat out sucks as a hockey player. Sucked with huge opportunity in Edmonton and it took Brind'Amour about a week to hate him in Carolina.Leave room for Puljujarvi in your mock line-ups. Please and thank you.
Kiviranta. Definitely a 4th liner for us if he came. Until the injuries that is.Who?
I'm still poolparty curious.Why is there an obsession over this guy? I get he's an analytical darling, but the dude flat out sucks as a hockey player. Sucked with huge opportunity in Edmonton and it took Brind'Amour about a week to hate him in Carolina.
I see a guy that couldn't produce at a high enough level next to the best player in the world... then a guy who pouts when he doesn't get his way... then a guy who couldn't provide a depth role on a team that should be contending (and loves their Finns). I just don't get itI'm still poolparty curious.