Wee Baby Seamus
Yo, Goober, where's the meat?
(two players who have never been capped by their national team get minutes because of injuries)
this is Leicester 2015-16
this is Leicester 2015-16
That’s two more than the other teams in the race. And it’s not a silly argument . A season in League One/League Two is not the same as multiple seasons in Ligue 1; seasons in the PL, etc.I just wanna add, not trolling, that even if we accept that being a "kid" hinges more on senior experience than on age (a silly take, IMO, but let's say for thought experiments sake), Quansah and Bradley are the only two who have gotten consistent minutes for Liverpool? Everyone else in the side is a full fledged international.
Firstly, I said the metrics support Saliba being a better defender/passer this year. I actually watch Arsenal play every week, and I catch a good amount of the Liverpool games. Comparing defensive statistics (especially counting ones) doesn't always draw meaningful conclusions.You mentioned metrics love Saliba, post them.I already did post mine a while back, use the search function.
Gusto and Colwill having first division experience doesn’t negate their youth at all, and no one is saying it does. The difference is when people try to be like “oh the LFC isn’t actually that young because of the dates on the birth certificates” it’s completely ignoring that the Chelsea players (for example) are in fact much more experienced, came from much higher transfer fees, and have not had as high a jump up in competition. Where are the lies here?I feel like we also shouldn't pretend they've played an insane amount? Rico Lewis (that's right, you're not the only team in the title race with a youth academy!) has played more minutes this season than Conor Bradley.
They've been doing very well! As you'd hope prospects would do when asked to step up a level! But this VVD stuff is veering into "CR7 willed Portugal to win the Euros" territory.
Also I don't see how Gusto and Colwill having been first division quality younger negates their current youth, but who the f*** knows what anything means at this point. Cole Palmer played fewer minutes last year than Bradley has this year, but I guess because they were at City he's a seasoned vet.
And yet you've provided metrics that don't support that Saliba is a better defender. Not sure what Gabriel had to do with our conversation (I love Gabriel)Firstly, I said the metrics support Saliba being a better defender/passer this year.
But when they’ve played they’ve had a very tangible impact. They are not passengers. They are trusted in big moments, they’ve gotten on the score sheet, hell I would have much rather have seen Jayden Danns than Cody Gakpo today. LFC have played them because they’ve had no choice, and this is still a team that was challenging on three fronts until a couple of hours ago. Virgil is the biggest reason LFC have not crumbled this season. You say the kids haven’t played that much; what would you quantify playing as a lot then? Which other team is giving that kind of burn out to internally produced youth? And having a successful season while doing so?People are saying LFC isn't that young because their first XI is entirely capped internationals and the "kids" we don't stop hearing about have actually not played that much!
The goalposts have ended up about halfway across town. If we're gonna have to endure hours and hours of "Klopp and Kids" narrative, I feel like the bar for "Klopp is winning the league with kids" is a helluva lot higher than two players who between them have played just over 1000 minutes.But when they’ve played they’ve had a very tangible impact. They are not passengers. They are trusted in big moments, they’ve gotten on the score sheet, hell I would have much rather have seen Jayden Danns than Cody Gakpo today. LFC have played them because they’ve had no choice, and this is still a team that was challenging on three fronts until a couple of hours ago. Virgil is the biggest reason LFC have not crumbled this season. You say the kids haven’t played that much; what would you quantify playing as a lot then? Which other team is giving that kind of burn out to internally produced youth? And having a successful season while doing so?
Yeah, that seems like the most likely. Though looking through it, quite a few of the sides outside the Portuguese big three are already linked up with external investment / other clubs.They wouldn’t want a top 3 side. Too expensive, though some of them likely have debt and would look for a portioned buyout if we were honest. Say, they could buy 30-35 percent of one. Then use that relationship for both.
If the goal posts have moved, that’s just where you’ve taken them. The margins for winning the league is so high, those 1000 minutes are incredibly important. It’s not a case of “oh it’s only 1000 minutes” . Those are critical, and again Virgil holding the team together while LFC has had to integrate youth from the academy is the biggest reason that LFC are where they are. It’s a very big deal.The goalposts have ended up about halfway across town. If we're gonna have to endure hours and hours of "Klopp and Kids" narrative, I feel like the bar for "Klopp is winning the league with kids" is a helluva lot higher than two players who between them have played just over 1000 minutes.
Yes, I think Bradley and Quansah are still going to get burn when those guys are healthy. Especially in the Europa League. Longer term, Bradley could be the reason that Trent is finally able to move into midfield as well. Quansah may be third choice CB next year, if he isn’t considered that already. Before the season started, that was not on anyone’s radar. Now these are core players. If anything, I don’t think you would see LFC go apeshit in the transfer market to push guys like this down the depth chart.You say about Rico Lewis, "oh but his minutes declined when players came back from injury." Are you earnestly trying to suggest that Bradley and Quansah will maintain major spots when Trent, Robertson, and Konate are fit? Or does the "it's just because of injury" caveat only operate to prevent a "Pep and Kids" narrative?
Only reason I haven’t mentioned Jones is because he’s been injured most of the season. Talked about him plenty when he was playing. Also again wanted to focus on people who were new to the team this season. We can talk about Harvey Elliott too who has been incredible this season as well too and he’s only 20 year old himself. Jones and Elliott both should be in the England squad this summer. No one is ignoring those guys. Would be happy to talk about them. Gravenberch is still 21. Stefan Bajcetic might have a higher ceiling than all of those guys but he’s been injured. And who has stepped up with those guys injured? Bobby Clark and James McConnell who nobody knew before the season started and came from the academy.It's lovely that a pair of youth players have entered the lineup and succeeded (even if they are at an age where, if they're gonna make it, you'd hope they'd be beginning to). But is it not enough to say that Klopp has done a very very good job rebuilding this team and leave it at that? We have to pretend the demographics of the club are different than they are? I actually don't care which other teams are/are not doing it, it's not relevant! There's no "omg look at what he's doing with the kids" narrative going on about those teams.
The irony of it is that the biggest youth success story for Liverpool this year is probably Curtis Jones, who has gone up a major step this season, but somehow doesn't fit your definition of a youth because he had the audacity to be better younger than some of his peers.
Looks like luton is jumping up to safety due to this.
I'd assume size of the loss.So on what basis do they get a four point deduction versus Everton’s six if it’s the same transgression?