- Mar 1, 2002
- 66,162
- 13,896
The Luckiest
I mean this is about as close as it gets, and we haven’t heard from PGMOL yet (to my knowledge), so that could be comingNot a PGMOL statement so it doesn't count, right? Thought that was the line in the sand?
I did not miss that part. I’m okay with it if that’s the right call. Just have to make the right calls. The Havertz dive was not the right call. If the Doku thing was the right call, so be it.You also probably missed where they said "...but says referee was right not to give Liverpool a late penalty vs Man City"
Sure the Havertz call was probably wrong.I mean this is about as close as it gets, and we haven’t heard from PGMOL yet (to my knowledge), so that could be coming
I did not miss that part. I’m okay with it if that’s the right call. Just have to make the right calls. The Havertz dive was not the right call. If the Doku thing was the right call, so be it.
This is neither cherry picking nor moving the goal posts. Just sharing an article. If you do not think the article is credible that’s on you.Sure the Havertz call was probably wrong.
That doesn't change the fact that you continuously cherry pick calls that favored other teams and say "they're so lucky again," but then ignore/downplay any calls in favor of Liverpool or calls that went against those other teams. Along with moving the goalposts of who should be the authority on whether a call was right/wrong when it suits you.
You just choose your own narrative and then only look at the points that support your narrative.
My conspiracy theory on this that I am going to keep to myself is they are BS’ing on this because they they don’t want to admit they made another mistake that hurt LFC. Especially in a title six pointer"they both come in high"
lmao
If I speak I am in big troubleIt’s over, but man. That VAR video is a bit bonkers.
If that panel thought the Doku thing wasn't a penalty they should find another job.Sure the Havertz call was probably wrong.
That doesn't change the fact that you continuously cherry pick calls that favored other teams and say "they're so lucky again," but then ignore/downplay any calls in favor of Liverpool or calls that went against those other teams. Along with moving the goalposts of who should be the authority on whether a call was right/wrong when it suits you.
You just choose your own narrative and then only look at the points that support your narrative.
For football most of the time the person who does this is my greatest enemyYeah, I run the scoreboard / clock for games.
The funniest thing on the whole clip."they both come in high"
lmao
The assistant VAR is clearly (trying) telling the VAR that he is wrong and the VAR is just refusing to listening. You have to laugh so you don’t cryThe funniest thing on the whole clip.
Might as well have said, Mac Allister is coming too high with his chest, he could have broken Doku's ankle with that much force.
Just wait until you see how bad it's gonna be in the future. You can barely get any younger people to do this. Coaches and fans are also getting more indulgent in thinking they can abuse officials too. Fans you can mostly ignore unless the game's over and you can finally hear them. But it's the things that happen when the game's over that make people not want to do it. Coaches are a lot more difficult.
I didn’t get any of those billions. I will complain.I will complain that’s it’s unbalanced. If LFC are going to be scheduled disproportionately, they should get a bigger cutWhen you accept billions, you can't complain. It's like complaining the weather is shit in England.