You shouldn't be able to bet on your team. Different on others.It is super hypocritical, but I get it, betting on your own sport gets into a dicey territory of players changing their performance based on the potential of money (i.e. throwing games which this sport has a long history of).
I think the blanket rule should be that you can't bet on your sport. There's just too much possibility for shenanigans within your own sport.
But also, I think that the EPL needs to decide whether it wants to treat gambling like alcohol in terms of sponsorships.
Yeah, but I don't really see that being a terribly detrimental thing. Like people bet with insider knowledge fairly often, if I had to guess. I don't see it as being something potentially anti-competitiveTo take it even further and this would be more North American centric, but even other sports could be dicey.
I wouldn't be surprised if a pro athlete playing for say, the New York Knicks would be acquainted/friends with pro athletes in other sports/leagues and have inside knowledge because of it.
Very impressive for an 18yo. See him more as an 8 than a 6 though.Curious question for you lot, are we in agreement that Mainoo is on the verge of wunderkid status? I don't pay too much attention to lads under 20-ish so I am not sure if he was ever hyped before, but he has been super impressive in the matches I've seen of him.
As a United fan, absolutely.Curious question for you lot, are we in agreement that Mainoo is on the verge of wunderkid status? I don't pay too much attention to lads under 20-ish so I am not sure if he was ever hyped before, but he has been super impressive in the matches I've seen of him.
Of course it gives home teams an advantage. That’s the point lolPremier League tells ball boys and girls to stop returning balls to players
Updated ruling says balls must be left by cones for players to collect, amid fears ‘multi-ball’ system is giving home teams advantagewww.telegraph.co.uk
Yeah, I've said it before but the Finnish hockey league has had for years a rule that players cant' bet on their own teams matches. Some people pointed out that they might have inside information on injuries to other team's players but in this day and age when social medias and sites like Jatkoaika, it's all known before the match anyway by the general public in Finland.You shouldn't be able to bet on your team. Different on others.
4.11 Vedonlyönti
Pelaaja sitoutuu siihen, ettei hän osallistu itse tai edustajansa välityksellä vedonlyöntiin
oman joukkueensa otteluista eikä hän muutoinkaan toimi tavalla, joka asettaa hänen
toimintansa tai työnantajan aseman suhteessa vedonlyöntiin tai veikkauspeleihin kyseenalaiseksi.
One month, expedted to be finish the season.Lisandro Martinez injured again, perhaps for the rest of the season.
You know the only thing “bad” about working remote full time is I don’t have the commute to listen to all these podcasts any moreVVD will be on The Rest is Football podcast Friday.......great podcast and worth a listen I would bet
Do they realize a “luxury tax” is useless without a salary cap?
Honestly don’t even think it’s City here. It’s all these teams that are going to get points deductions because they didn’t think PSR was serious; and now are trying to change the rules. This is like Chelsea/Everton/Forest/Newcastle etc. there’s no way Todd isn’t leading the charge on thisSo, basically, a mecanism so City can do whatever they want. A system they'll introduce before suspending City for their 115 FFP offenses.
Pathetic.
How does whoscored define counterattack? I don't mean this as a gotcha or anything, I'm just genuinely curious.Spurs have 1 loss in the 15 matches that van de Ven plays all 90.
With all the talk about how playing so open would rip Spurs open and let in tons of goals on the counter, this shows only 2 goals allowed on the counter this year, but I think 2 of the 7 penalties came from counters.
How does whoscored define counterattack? I don't mean this as a gotcha or anything, I'm just genuinely curious.