PanniniClaus
Registered User
- Oct 12, 2006
- 11,004
- 4,812
An AI predicted that, but I trust @Savant more.
- 1. Manchester City (86.6 points)
- 2. Arsenal (77.5 points)
- 3. Liverpool (76.1 points)
- 4. Manchester United (73.3 points)
- 5. Newcastle (68.3 points)
- 6. Chelsea (67.8 points)
- 7. Tottenham (62.2 points)
- 8. Brighton (58.1 points)
- 9. Aston Villa (56.5 points)
- 10. West Ham (47.3 points)
- 11. Brentford (46.0 points)
- 12. Crystal Palace (43.0 points)
- 13. Fulham (40.3 points)
- 14. Burnley (39.3 points)
- 15. Everton (38.7 points)
- 16. Wolves (38.5 points)
- 17. Bournemouth (37.2 points)
- 18. Nottingham Forest (36.2 points)
- 19. Sheffield United (31.7 points)
- 20. Luton (30.5 points)
I mean, it’s not or it shouldn’t be that much of a surprise no? Spurs finished 8th last season with Kane and Son, haven’t really do anything amazing in the transfer market, will still start Dier as a CB, got a manager which is like their 7th choice on their shortlist, might lose Kane on free next year, and/or might lose Kane this year. Seeing other clubs do better in the transfer market while Spurs have been treading downwards for a while now. Going from 8th to 11th, especially if you lot lose Kane isn’t this revelation scenario...Spurs 11th with potential to do worse. Mmkay.
If CP keeps all their players, I think they will surprise people this season. If they lose even Olise, then I have no problem reverting them back to their below mid-table position.Think you all have Crystal Palace too high. They might not be bad enough to get relegated unfortunately but they haven't added anything, have lost some and might lose more in Olise, and they rode a high to keep them afloat the end of last year. Not a very good team imo.
Man City were pretty much perfect last year, I am not sure if they are able to replicate that success just because it is hard to do. They were also pretty fortunate with injuries as well like Arsenal was. They can absolutely win the league again, but I think both them and Arsenal should be closer to the pack compared to last year.I agree with this and make it 2-9 and include Arsenal (& switch Palace for Spurs) ... I think the gap between city in 1st and 2nd is larger than the gap between 2nd and 9th.
Man City were not “pretty much perfect” last year. Especially in the league. Especially in the first half of the season. This wasn’t even Pep’s best Man City teamMan City were pretty much perfect last year, I am not sure if they are able to replicate that success just because it is hard to do. They were also pretty fortunate with injuries as well like Arsenal was. They can absolutely win the league again, but I think both them and Arsenal should be closer to the pack compared to last year.
I am not excluding or denying that the club suffered some dips, but Arsenal went like 12-1-1 or something and we still didn’t win the league, so…Man City were not “pretty much perfect” last year. Especially in the league. Especially in the first half of the season. This wasn’t even Pep’s best Man City team
Yeah - the league season is longer than 14 games. It’s not 2013 anymore; runs like that aren’t enoughI am not excluding or denying that the club suffered some dips, but Arsenal went like 12-1-1 or something and we still didn’t win the league, so…
I mean, it’s not or it shouldn’t be that much of a surprise no? Spurs finished 8th last season with Kane and Son, haven’t really do anything amazing in the transfer market, will still start Dier as a CB, got a manager which is like their 7th choice on their shortlist, might lose Kane on free next year, and/or might lose Kane this year. Seeing other clubs do better in the transfer market while Spurs have been treading downwards for a while now. Going from 8th to 11th, especially if you lot lose Kane isn’t this revelation scenario.
An AI predicted that, but I trust @Savant more.
Win one of their games against City and they may have won the league... instead they got picked apart and lost both.I am not excluding or denying that the club suffered some dips, but Arsenal went like 12-1-1 or something and we still didn’t win the league, so…
A large majority of the Spurs squad underperformed compared to what they had previously shown. A large part of this is due to Conte. There have been a couple of players delivering scathing reviews of him during intetviews to corroborate this.
On top of this Lloris lost us way too many games. Statistically one of the worst goalies in the prem last season.
Another thing to consider is that Son was playing injured for most of last season, which was pretty apparent. I think these are the main factors as to why Spurs had such a poor season.
As for the upcoming season...
Lloris has been replaced now. Brought in Vicario who is an analytical darling for cheap. I am hopeful.
Got Maddison for a decent fee who should provide plenty of goal contributions.
Son has had his surgery.
Eric Dier also played last season injured and has had his surgery. However he probably isn't a starter anymore since Spurs are bringing in Van de Ven.
Yes, there's the Kane saga of course, but the fact that you think Spurs can't do better than 11th, below Fulham and Crystal Palace, if he were to stay is such an awful take.
Surprised Sterling did so little at Chelsea, surprised, but not shocked. That club last year was all kinds of terrible.The same people who think that Spurs can’t improve and will regress seem to be the same people who think Chelsea will go to Europe somehow when they had 16 points to make up on Spurs just to get to 7th place.
this was their third consecutive PL, so they have clearly showed they can replicate success. I do agree that the PL has become extremely top heavyMan City were pretty much perfect last year, I am not sure if they are able to replicate that success just because it is hard to do. They were also pretty fortunate with injuries as well like Arsenal was. They can absolutely win the league again, but I think both them and Arsenal should be closer to the pack compared to last year.
This sounds like a lot of excuses mate. I do think Spurs had some Murphy's law last season. However, there is a term in psychology known as "gamblers fallacy" which states because you lost 15 times in a row, you think you would win next time which in reality this isn't the case. Conte might've been a distraction but he is 95%. Of course he deserves a good amount of blame himself but he's still right about how the toxic culture is throughout the organization.A large majority of the Spurs squad underperformed compared to what they had previously shown. A large part of this is due to Conte. There have been a couple of players delivering scathing reviews of him during intetviews to corroborate this.
On top of this Lloris lost us way too many games. Statistically one of the worst goalies in the prem last season.
Another thing to consider is that Son was playing injured for most of last season, which was pretty apparent. I think these are the main factors as to why Spurs had such a poor season.
As for the upcoming season...
Lloris has been replaced now. Brought in Vicario who is an analytical darling for cheap. I am hopeful.
Got Maddison for a decent fee who should provide plenty of goal contributions.
Son has had his surgery.
Eric Dier also played last season injured and has had his surgery. However he probably isn't a starter anymore since Spurs are bringing in Van de Ven.
Yes, there's the Kane saga of course, but the fact that you think Spurs can't do better than 11th, below Fulham and Crystal Palace, if he were to stay is such an awful take.
Not sure why I’m catching strays. I’m not dropping predictions until mercato is over, but this not going to look like this. Only thing I 100% agree with is City at 1, but that’s obviously not going out on a limbAn AI predicted that, but I trust @Savant more.
They could've easily lost a couple and gave up considering Arsenals run for 98% of the season. They didn't and kept pace being just in our shadow until we got banged up and they overtook us. This wasn't one of their best teams, agreed, but still an amazing one considering that Haaland was breaking every record that was recorded in the FA 160 year existence. I get you hated the talent last year but it was still one of the strongest EPL years ever. It's not my fault your team wasn't part of it.Yeah - the league season is longer than 14 games. It’s not 2013 anymore; runs like that aren’t enough
And that still doesn’t mean that it was one of the best City teams. Doesn’t matter if my team was a part of it or not; they aren’t going to be a part of it this season either. City won the league last year in a flukey season interrupted in November and December by the World Cup. The teams that weren’t in UCL benefited greatly. City started out very bad and their only competition was an Arsenal team that couldn’t break 90 and didn’t know how to close. City’s 100 point and 98 point teams were unquestionably better and there’s an argument that their 21/22 was better as well. Last year they were simply carried by a Nuclear Haaland. Which was fun for all the fantasy players, but this was not one of Peps best teamsThey could've easily lost a couple and gave up considering Arsenals run for 98% of the season. They didn't and kept pace being just in our shadow until we got banged up and they overtook us. This wasn't one of their best teams, agreed, but still an amazing one considering that Haaland was breaking every record that was recorded in the FA 160 year existence. I get you hated the talent last year but it was still one of the strongest EPL years ever. It's not my fault your team wasn't part of it.
From my shoddy memory they had a few 'miracle' goals to either win or draw in the final minutes of at least 5 or 6 matches too....And that still doesn’t mean that it was one of the best City teams. Doesn’t matter if my team was a part of it or not. City won the league last year in a flukey season interrupted in November and December by the World Cup. The teams that weren’t in UCL benefited greatly. City started out very bad and their only competition was an Arsenal team that couldn’t break 90 and didn’t know how to close. City’s 100 point and 98 point teams were unquestionably better and there’s an argument that their 21/22 was better as well. Last year they were simply carried by a Nuclear Haaland. Which was fun for all the fantasy players, but this was not one of Peps best teams
Crystal Palace and Fulham are right now better teams easily
Trust me, I get it. The truth hurts the most for opposing fans.Congrats on the worst post in the thread.
$1000 bucks on each team, I get Spurs against both.
*reaches hand out
Put up your predictions vs SEPH and we compare at end of seasonCongrats on the worst post in the thread.
$1000 bucks on each team, I get Spurs against both.
*reaches hand out"
I recall 3 specifically - Jorginho winner against Villa, Reiss winner against Bournemouth, and 2 goals at the end to tie Southampton. "At least 5 or 6" is a stretch even if I'm forgetting one. Also, we got screwed out of points against United and Brentford by referee errors earlier in the season (PGMOL admitted this, it's not just me saying it).From my shoddy memory they had a few 'miracle' goals to either win or draw in the final minutes of at least 5 or 6 matches too....
Explain please?Of course he deserves a good amount of blame himself but he's still right about how the toxic culture is throughout the organization.
Unproven to you clearly. Ridiculous to say he can be no better than Kepa when you don't know much about him.Lloris is a good shout because he was rubbish last season but you lot bought an unproven goalkeeper. He might turn out to be Kepa bad or just very average.
I firmly believe that you are the one with the blinders on.Crystal Palace and Fulham are right now better teams easily. You got some blinder mode on if you think Spurs are better than them.
Well not really, it's just the community shield.It starts it starts! TODAY IS THE DAY!!!!!!!!!!
IT STARTS NOW!!!!
I'd love to but it's stupid to do it already.Put up your predictions vs SEPH and we compare at end of season