I may have misinterpreted what I heard in the interview. He was asked if he was the top guy on his board and he said he was in that range, but was not the top guy (aka BPA).
I suppose Wes was thinking of the entire draft, while the reporter was asking out of the guys who are left.
Although I mean come on Wes... Like do you genuinely think the reporter is asking you if you had him at the top of your board in the entire draft? "Yeah, I had him ranked above Michkov, Bedard, Fantilli, and Carlsson".
And considering I fully believe that there are instances where a team doesn't necessarily draft the top guy left on their board, the reporter was justified in asking if he was the top guy remaining. In which case he effectively said 'no', but he was in that range.
I guess either way, it is not really a good look and Clark has a lot to prove. First with Minten and now with Cowan. Because neither should have even been in the range of BPA, let alone their BPA, so either they are taking some really bold risks with their evaluation criteria, or they are not taking BPA. Compound that with the idea that they were genuinely afraid to lose him to another team and was not willing (although possibly not able as well) to move down is even more concerning because even if he was somehow BPA, he was not head and shoulders BPA.