The Masters
Registered User
- Jun 30, 2018
- 4,400
- 6,037
i can even picture him filling a role on Matthews wing and digging out pucks for him, so, Matthews isnt just constantly getting into shooting position for a puck the never comes, because none of his linemates can take away/win a board puck battlethe more I watch and read up on this player the better I feel about this pick. Seems like he has an excellent chance of becoming a real high end complete middle six forward. Not expecting him to make an impact anytime soon though, looks like he’s still 2 years away from being 2 years away.
I hope eventually everyone realizes hey man this is our pick and we want him to succeed. If he succeeds, the leafs succeeds, instead of OH NOESGeneral vibe after the season: we have too many skilled-type players to succeed in the playoffs.
General vibe after this pick: we should have drafted a skilled player with 1st-line potential.
This place is funny.
Being critical of this pick doesn’t mean people don’t want him to succeed.I hope eventually everyone realizes hey man this is our pick and we want him to succeed. If he succeeds, the leafs succeeds, instead of OH NOES
Definitely important to be critical and wonder what could've been, Gauthier over TheodoreBeing critical of this pick doesn’t mean people don’t want him to succeed.
I was so pissed the Leafs took Gauthier over Hunter Shinkarik at the time lol. The Leafs may have been wrong but I certainly wasn’t right that year.Definitely important to be critical and wonder what could've been, Gauthier over Theodore
Best to accept & adapt instead of looking for the ship that's sailed IMO.
Oh, I remember Hunter, yea there was so much hype around him too! But I had eyes set on Theodore for a long time, and have buddies in Seattle so I knew this guy was gonna be good Was not happy as Nonis went with the pick of need, not BPA. Gauthier is a nice guy just not the player.I was so pissed the Leafs took Gauthier over Hunter Shinkarik at the time lol. The Leafs may have been wrong but I certainly wasn’t right that year.
I agree that it’s best to try to find the upside here especially when you are looking at picks that will really be a mystery box for years but I think you can do that while still acknowledging legitimate criticisms. I like this prospect. I also think they likely could have traded down 20 spots and still got him.
He would have no long gone. We got a gem and at 28 we stoled him. Next season he will be talked about as a big steal.Should have traded down and got him at 40.
Leafs eventually post it on their youtube page but its not up yet.Where can we hear the full interview
maybe the leafs wanted to trade down but they could could not find a team to deal with. The kid did get 21 points in 20 playoff games. you can't do without having skill.if Easton is as good as Matt knies and nick Robertson we have a good prospect. The first round was unusual as no team traded down
The most important thing is not skills, its hockey QI... Having elite skill without hockey QI, who will not able to use it in NHL
Having less skill bit high hockey QI, you can be an impactful player
The best exemple i can give you is Patrice Bergeron who are not an elite skilled player but hes probably the smartest player in NHL. Hes always at the right spot at the right time, he rarely make mistake, he saw the play coming to him before its happening, hes reading prefectly whats his opponent trying to do as much offensivly than defensivly.
This is true, if they could have traded back and gotten them they would have. They couldn’t. I wouldn’t even be surprised if he would have been picked in the 1st round if we had went elsewhere.
Most of those player will be grinder...Player IQ has been way overstated by the Dubas regime over the past number of years.
Of course you don’t want a roster full of Alex Galchenyuk’s, that’s literally good skills gone to waste because of a lack of hockey IQ… and of course you want a Patrice Bergeron who bats above what his physical tools are… but the game is full of good systems players who play effectively without having that IQ (trademark) branding.
They drafted two D's in Liljegren and Sandin in the 1st round in back-to-back drafts...The Toronto Maple Leafs continue to show why they are so much smarter than the other 31 teams in the NHL.
Under Wes Clark as head of amateur scouting, the Leafs have typically drafted a scoring forward with their first pick, regardless of what round it is in. It doesn't matter if the player is undersized, can't skate backwards, or has any other deficiencies in his game. If he can put the puck in the net, draft him.
Clearly that philosophy hasn't changed since Dubas left.
I don't know anything about Cowan other than what I've just read. His ceiling appears to be lower than previous reaches by the NHL's smartest front office. He's looks to be more of the same of what they have drafted plenty of already.
So much for diversification.
Another master class in asset management, Toronto Maple Leafs style.