- It’s not about VHL < CHL. Don’t know where I wrote this. Petrov is Top 10 in the O, so he done something the earn the talk about him on the U20 Roster.
- We should consider options, especially if we don’t have quality right shooters. By your logic we shouldn’t take Miro. 9 U20 Players have more points in the VHL, 17 U20 players have the better PPG.
- Above Miro is not a “huge leap take”. Miro is Nichushkin 2.0…
- Realistically Miro is an double underager…
- Realistically Ivantsov is an underager too…
- Yurov is miles ahead of Gushchin as a prospect. Right now he is not. And if we are talking about line combos it’s not always about who is the best player. Gushchin is perfectly capable of playing the 1st RW.
1.Something in the O is not enough. Perevalov did quite a bit more in the M(he is still 2nd in scoring by one point and 2nd only to Michkov in PPG among players with 10+GP) and he is not in the talk about being invited. He is younger than Petrov too. Same applies btw to Kisakov who was 2nd in MHL scoring last season.
2.I am not a fan of the handedness narrative. It is illogical. Maybe only if you have a whole team that shoots on the same side, but otherwise constructing units based on handedness and not on skill is dumb. Theree is nothing wrong with having a RHS on the left or right, nothing at all. It's just different.
Miroshnichenko is obviously having a maybe not as good as expected season in the VHL. But you forgot his age. He is having that VHL season as a 17 year old. He is a full year younger than Chibrikov. So comparing his numbers to 19 year olds is not the proper way to evaluate his performance in the VHL. Yes, he will partially get the call based on past merit. I know that and I wrote that, but doing what he is doing in the VHL at 17 still weighs more in my book than Petrov's OHL performance at 18.
So still, considering options, and there are a lot this year I would take Miro over Petrov.
3.That's your personal opinion I don't agree with at all.
4.See above. That is why his VHL performance is quite good. And on junior level he will perform.
5.Yes, while he is a year older. so technically you could compare him to the likes of Chibrikov. He is also a center and despite having a "year for the ages" our center depth is far worse than our winger depth. It basically boils down to taking a skilled, smallish underager as a 4C or Tankov who is bigger and allegedly better defensively.
6.Yurov right here and now is a better player by a country mile. The fact that he continues playing as an underager somewhat shifts the perception.One might sometimes forget how young he is, because he does not only not look out of place among U20 players, he is one of the best. It will also happen a lot in this age group. There is so much hype around Michkov, people forget about other talents. The top stars(not as prospects in general, but based on their now performance) of that WJC squad as I see them are Chibrikov, Michkov, Yurov and then comes everybody else.