Speculation: 2022 Summer/off season Sharks Roster Discussion

Status
Not open for further replies.

Juxtaposer

Outro: Divina Comedia
Dec 21, 2009
50,168
23,995
Bay Area
Some rumors the sens will trade Connor Brown. I like him alot, but players of his style seem to cost way too much these days compared to what they do bring.
I’ve always liked Connor Brown. He’s the type of guy a contender should be trading for at the deadline, not a mid team during the summer.
 
  • Like
Reactions: themelkman

STL Shark

Registered User
Mar 6, 2013
4,407
5,475
Burns with 2M retained for Faksa + 2nd round pick E2?
Not retaining a dime if it means taking on a bloated Faksa contract for 3 years. If you retain, Sharks get virtually no cap savings ($2.75 million a year) and an even more expensive and less good version of Bonino to ice the leagues most expensive 4th line ever. Heck no on that one from a Sharks perspective.
 

Pinkfloyd

Registered User
Oct 29, 2006
71,621
15,324
Folsom
Not retaining a dime if it means taking on a bloated Faksa contract for 3 years. If you retain, Sharks get virtually no cap savings ($2.75 million a year) and an even more expensive and less good version of Bonino to ice the leagues most expensive 4th line ever. Heck no on that one from a Sharks perspective.
If Burns goes, I'm guessing it's because he wants to and in that case they just need to get a deal done regardless of the return.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan

STL Shark

Registered User
Mar 6, 2013
4,407
5,475
If Burns goes, I'm guessing it's because he wants to and in that case they just need to get a deal done regardless of the return.
Doesn't mean that the Sharks are obliged to retain salary on him though. That's the point. They're not retaining salary and taking a cap dump back in return. Just because a player wants to go doesn't mean you have to make a bad deal just to be nice.
 

Pinkfloyd

Registered User
Oct 29, 2006
71,621
15,324
Folsom
Doesn't mean that the Sharks are obliged to retain salary on him though. That's the point. They're not retaining salary and taking a cap dump back in return. Just because a player wants to go doesn't mean you have to make a bad deal just to be nice.
It may. It may not. I don't hold much hope on a Burns trade.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Sandisfan

sharski

Registered User
Jun 4, 2012
5,836
5,074
Reunite Pavs and Burns! This will increase the odds of a lottery pick next year.

Yeah… for Dallas
SpryHorribleFruitfly-max-1mb.gif
 

hohosaregood

Banned
Sep 1, 2011
33,149
13,788
His Florida tenure to me showed that he's not ready for the gig yet. Let him be an assistant again for a few years before considering him.
If you really believe in his potential as a coach, bringing him in now wouldn't be the craziest thing. Let him work through the kinks with a growing team like they did with Bednar. But it's hard to say how much he actually did for the Panthers. I didn't watch any Panthers games so I don't really know how much credit he can personally take or if he just carried on what Quenneville set up in the first place. Not to mention the terrible playoffs he just went through. There's a good possibility he lucked his way into a pretty easy situation
 

STL Shark

Registered User
Mar 6, 2013
4,407
5,475
If you really believe in his potential as a coach, bringing him in now wouldn't be the craziest thing. Let him work through the kinks with a growing team like they did with Bednar. But it's hard to say how much he actually did for the Panthers. I didn't watch any Panthers games so I don't really know how much credit he can personally take or if he just carried on what Quenneville set up in the first place. Not to mention the terrible playoffs he just went through. There's a good possibility he lucked his way into a pretty easy situation
Panthers fans hated him. Q was the brains of that operation. I also find it comical that anyone would be in the camp of taking one failed Panthers coach to replace another failed Panthers coach (where the one we already have did more with a whole lot less than the other).
 

Pinkfloyd

Registered User
Oct 29, 2006
71,621
15,324
Folsom
If you really believe in his potential as a coach, bringing him in now wouldn't be the craziest thing. Let him work through the kinks with a growing team like they did with Bednar. But it's hard to say how much he actually did for the Panthers. I didn't watch any Panthers games so I don't really know how much credit he can personally take or if he just carried on what Quenneville set up in the first place. Not to mention the terrible playoffs he just went through. There's a good possibility he lucked his way into a pretty easy situation
The Sharks aren’t a growing team to my eyes. They still need to dismantle what their core is now and start over so I’m okay with waiting Brunette out a bit.
 

Anomie2029

Registered User
Oct 10, 2013
4,060
4,474
Melbourne, Australia
Panthers fans hated him. Q was the brains of that operation. I also find it comical that anyone would be in the camp of taking one failed Panthers coach to replace another failed Panthers coach (where the one we already have did more with a whole lot less than the other).
What do you mean? I've been told Boughner didn't fail because he didn't have the team in Florida.
/sarcasm
 

Hodge

Registered User
Apr 27, 2021
6,794
8,066
What do you mean? I've been told Boughner didn't fail because he didn't have the team in Florida.
/sarcasm
If you don’t realize Bill Zito completely overhauled that team long after Boughner was fired I don’t know what to tell you.
 

Stewie Griffin

What the deuce
May 9, 2019
5,331
8,705
Canada
Yeah that's what we should be doing. We've missed the playoffs 3 years in a row, and haven't sold/added any key core players. We're closer to drafting 1st overall than winning the cup so it should be pretty simple which option we try and do.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad