Patty Ice
Mighty Luca
TML pundit suggests Reimer for 5th. (And that Hill is the Sharks' presumptive guy going forward.)
That is a joke. Par for the course from that corner.
TML pundit suggests Reimer for 5th. (And that Hill is the Sharks' presumptive guy going forward.)
No Sharks listed as top trade targets
Would fit perfectly with the sharks so called competing plan they have done the last 3 seasons make stupid moves to say they are trying but at the same time actually making the team worse, but not worse enough to make a difference.After the trade (and keeping Weber on LTIR), they have $5.2m available. (And need to sign/"call up" 4-7 more guys.)
Could a reunion with James Reimer be beneficial to the Maple Leafs?
This is something I didn’t think I’d write, but here we are. At the moment, all signs point to Petr Mrazek being gone by the end of summer which means the Maple Leafs will need another backup goaltender.www.yardbarker.com
TML pundit suggests Reimer for 5th. (And that Hill is the Sharks' presumptive guy going forward.)
Personally, I'd rather keep Reimer than acquire a 5th.
NoHi guys, I see that you have 3 NHL goalies in Reimer, Hill and Kahkonen. Do you guys think that you'll move Reimer this offseason and run with the 2 younger goalies?
Most here think Hill is the goalie that they will move. It could be Reimer if some team makes a good enough offer. It’s doubtful that they will move Kahkonen.Hi guys, I see that you have 3 NHL goalies in Reimer, Hill and Kahkonen. Do you guys think that you'll move Reimer this offseason and run with the 2 younger goalies?
Thanks guys, he looks like a player that could make sense for the Oilers and is from Alberta to boot. My question is what would the asking price be for him? I believe that you guys traded a 2nd for him so I assume that your GM would be looking for something similar in return?Most here think Hill is the goalie that they will move. It could be Reimer if some team makes a good enough offer. It’s doubtful that they will move Kahkonen.
We traded a 2nd and Korenar for Hill and a 7th. That would probably put his value then at a 3rd but I think his value has dropped since so I’d expect a 4th or 5th rounder back. Personally, I’d look to get even less if it meant being able to tag Radim Simek in a trade with him for a 7th.Thanks guys, he looks like a player that could make sense for the Oilers and is from Alberta to boot. My question is what would the asking price be for him? I believe that you guys traded a 2nd for him so I assume that your GM would be looking for something similar in return?
I don't think that we'd have a need for Simek as I am hopeful that we sign Kulak for similar money. A 4th or 5th sounds like a reasonable price. That said, management would need to be pretty confident in him if Smith retires as our only goalie under contract if that happens will be a rookie Stuart Skinner.We traded a 2nd and Korenar for Hill and a 7th. That would probably put his value then at a 3rd but I think his value has dropped since so I’d expect a 4th or 5th rounder back. Personally, I’d look to get even less if it meant being able to tag Radim Simek in a trade with him for a 7th.
I would not be very confident in Hill, he was injured and had a pretty meh season. Reimer is for sure the guy I would trust more, but he would cost a second plus a decent prospect.I don't think that we'd have a need for Simek as I am hopeful that we sign Kulak for similar money. A 4th or 5th sounds like a reasonable price. That said, management would need to be pretty confident in him if Smith retires as our only goalie under contract if that happens will be a rookie Stuart Skinner.
Beauvillier yes, Puljujarvi no. Puljujarvi was invisible most of the playoffs when I watched him. Had opportunities playing with Edmonton's top guys and didn't do much. A change of scenery would probably do him well, but I wouldn't give up much for him. Nichushkin is the guy I want.Of the targets listed I could see the sharks looking at Beauvillier and Puljujarvi
Yeah but Nuke is going to come with a big long term contract that everyone here is going to complain about immediately.Beauvillier yes, Puljujarvi no. Puljujarvi was invisible most of the playoffs when I watched him. Had opportunities playing with Edmonton's top guys and didn't do much. A change of scenery would probably do him well, but I wouldn't give up much for him. Nichushkin is the guy I want.
We got quite a few bad contracts to dump. Sounds like the management team is open to discussion on anyone. The new GM is going to be busy and can't wait to see what changes are in store for the club.Yeah but Nuke is going to come with a big long term contract that everyone here is going to complain about immediately.
So do I, but free agents arent nearly as easy to convince to come to SJ.Beauvillier yes, Puljujarvi no. Puljujarvi was invisible most of the playoffs when I watched him. Had opportunities playing with Edmonton's top guys and didn't do much. A change of scenery would probably do him well, but I wouldn't give up much for him. Nichushkin is the guy I want.
or Kakko. If they're available for reasonable rates, they should be targetsNuke is old news, he’s going to get paid now. We need to find the next Nuke before he breaks out. I think that’s Puljujarvi.
Totally agree. All the signs point to a breakout in the right situation. Just not sure of the cost, if we could trade a second and a prospect or swap someone like Reimer I would love it.Nuke is old news, he’s going to get paid now. We need to find the next Nuke before he breaks out. I think that’s Puljujarvi.
What, pray tell; makes San Jose the “right situation”. I imagine the right situation would have been consistently playing with Connor or Leon or both but here we are…Totally agree. All the signs point to a breakout in the right situation. Just not sure of the cost, if we could trade a second and a prospect or swap someone like Reimer I would love it.
Reimer would a good fit for the Oilers. Much better than Mike friggin Smith.Totally agree. All the signs point to a breakout in the right situation. Just not sure of the cost, if we could trade a second and a prospect or swap someone like Reimer I would love it.
Nuke is old news, he’s going to get paid now. We need to find the next Nuke before he breaks out. I think that’s Puljujarvi.
Sometimes that just isnt the case because the system doesnt fit the players skillset. It feels to me that the Oilers set up that works best is Mcdavid doing all the work and then someone just needs to be able to shoot.What, pray tell; makes San Jose the “right situation”. I imagine the right situation would have been consistently playing with Connor or Leon or both but here we are…
I have always thought that swap made some sense. JVR would be a good fit for us even though hes expensive, it would be a better use of our money than an offensive D man.Could the rumors of Philly being active in trades this summer give us a partner? They were last in power play conversion and second in GPG for. They have bad goaltending and need offense.
Could Burns (would need to agree) and Reimer be of interest if we take JVR’s last year as a dump with a pick and/or prospect? Could retain on Reimer too; would rather not retain for three years on Burns. Not sure what a fair value trade would look like around those assets.
Burns + Gritty memes could entertain.
This would be contingent on us committing to being bad next year… which I think is likely whether the team is committed to it or not.