Prospect Info: 2022 Post-Deadline Devils-Centric Mock Draft 2.0 (thru NJ 2nd round)

Guttersniped

I like goalies who stop the puck
Sponsor
Dec 20, 2018
22,675
50,599
Any thoughts on Artyom Barabosha? Maybe I have a type but a stay at home RD that looks for hits and can pass sound pretty awesome to me.

(Not So Serious)
I also hope we draft
Michael Mastrodomenico, Boston Buckberger, and Brady Stonehouse just for their names alone.

Wait.. Boston has a twin! we need the Buckberger twins! and they have a little brother that is draft eligble in 2024!

I too noticed Boston Buckberger’s amazing cartoony name very recently and I’m both shocked and saddened it hasn’t gotten more attention.

He’s sounds like old Pulp character from old timey radio programs/film serials. (Or a porn parody of that. Either works really.)
 
  • Like
Reactions: mdj12784

My3Sons

Nobody told me there'd be days like these...
Sponsor
I too noticed Boston Buckberger’s amazing cartoony name very recently and I’m both shocked and saddened it hasn’t gotten more attention.

He’s sounds like old Pulp character from old timey radio programs/film serials. (Or a porn parody of that. Either works really.)
What about Jaffer Firkus? the lyrics write themselves.
 

Devils731

Registered User
Jun 23, 2008
12,945
18,397

I thought this was an interesting blurb on Nazar.

“In his first year at the program, there were growing pains for Frank III that were bigger than those of many of his teammates. But he then just kept getting better and better.

The switch flipped, according to Fohr, when they moved him from the wing to centre, to get his smallish frame (today he’s 5-foot-10 and says his weight fluctuates between 170 and 175 pounds) off the wall and into the middle where he could really skate.”

————-

What a change for the modern game where smaller guys who are great skaters get moved to center to give them more room to move and skate. I think it can make sense when you’re dealing with elite skaters.
Post automatically merged:

They are due for a 1st pick win. Last and only time they've ever picked first was in 75, with Mel Bridgeman, and that due to a trade with the Caps. Obviously the odds are against them.

In all likely-hood, we will be picking 1, 2, 5, 6, or 7th. If Philly wins and we lose, 1, 2, 4, 5, or 6th. (Just like last year).
As someone with the last name Bridgeman I am obligated to say his name is Mel Bridgman and that I’m not related to him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Guttersniped

Captain3rdLine

Registered User
Sep 24, 2020
7,616
8,857
No, I'm skeptical that he's a top 5 prospect in this class (bad wording on my part), there's little doubt that he'll go top 5 in the actual draft and more likely than not be the #1 pick. The only players that can actually threaten him for the #1 slot are Cooley and possibly Slafkovsky but even then that's probably not likely too happen.

My point is more that I don't see how Wright has separated himself from the top of this class considering his production and skillset aren't anything special and I'd argue multiple prospects towards the top have him beat in at least one of those areas. The only reason people seem to have him as a #1 lock is due to his pedigree he built up in prior seasons.

I'd comfortably rank Jiricek, Slafkovsky, Cooley and Nemec ahead of him and I'd consider guys like Savoie, Lambert, Nazar, Lekkerimaki and Kemell as well.
His overall skillset and all around game is the best. You keep talking about his production like it’s a negative and well it wasn’t anything special it’s still very good in his draft year and better than pretty much everyone else’s. He is also considered to be a very defensively responsible and a good all around forward.

Cooley is not even remotely a threat to Wright as the number 1 spot. If he kept on improving on the first half of his season maybe he could’ve been. But there’s been draft eligibles on his own team who have been better than him and people who think he may not even be the best prospect on his own team. Slafkovsky might be with the potential he has and his strong finish.
Wrights pedigree and what he did prior to this season is certainly part of it because he has been really good for a while and even though people may have hoped for more from him nobody else has outdone him this season or done enough to have surpassed him.

That is far from the only reason though. In saying that some other top prospects have likely beaten him in at least one aspect you’re probably right. But the important part is the one aspect part. Others may be better than him at 1 or 2 things but not that much better and than he is better than them at everything else. There’s no holes in his game. He’s a strong skater, smart player, responsible player, with good size, and a wicked shot that he hasn’t been able to score with as much as you would expect this season.

It’s not necessarily that Wright has done something great this season to separate himself and is probably more that he came in ahead as the consensus number 1 and no one else has done anything to catch or surpass him and he posses the best all-around game.

If this discussion was just about pure potential I could understand arguments that certain other top prospects have equal or even better high-end potential. But Wright has high-end potential and where his separation comes in is when you realize that he is definitely the safest pick in the draft.

It is very likely that whoever takes Wright will have a top 5 player in this draft 10 years from now. Or at least close to that.
 

StevenToddIves

Registered User
May 18, 2013
11,077
27,989
Brooklyn, NY
It'll be very interesting to see what happens with the movement at the top of this draft class as we get closer to the draft. I'm starting to be skeptical about the idea of Wright as a top 5 pick in this class let alone a slam dunk 1st overall pick. There's some good traits here but the lack of assertiveness and playmaking even at the OHL level is very worrying. I can't help but to wonder if he's just someone who matured and filled out faster than his peers like a Alexis Lafreniere (and I think Lafreniere was much more impressive in his draft season) and if he's lacking in terms of untapped potential.
You might not personally be high on Wright, which is subjective but of course absolutely your opinion and your right. However, the only way he doesn't go #1 overall is if the Devils win the lottery and then decide not to trade the pick. Every other team in the lottery needs a top 6 center, and Wright is the consensus #1, and it's not close.

Can you see Montreal passing on Wright -- having only one legit top 6 C in the organization (Suzuki) and risking the unabashed wrath of an entire fanbase for going off the board with new management? Or Arizona, the thinnest organization up the middle in the entire NHL and desperate for a marquee star? Philadelphia? Columbus? Chicago? There's just no way these teams would win the lottery and not take Wright.

I suppose we can say Seattle is a wild-card, but it's tough to see them passing up on a potential 1/1A C duo of Wright and Beniers for the next decade-plus. The Devils are the *only* team who would create some intrigue at #1, because Hughes is a greater talent than Wright and Wright's skill-set is not dissimilar from Hischier. I think at #1 the Devils would either trade down or, unable to find a deal, decide between Slafkovsky and Jiricek.
Post automatically merged:

You’re skeptical of Wright getting taken in the top 5? Ok, wacky stuff can happen but that I don’t see that as possible.

Nolan Patrick played 33 games and still got taken 2nd, his draft stock as a potential 1C isn’t going to lose that much value. Not sure who the five players are that could all take him down.

It’s not like European wingers from Liiga have been slam dunks with production (Kakko, Puljujärvi), so Slafkovsky, or Kemell, might feel like less safe picks.

Defensemen are traditionally less safe picks and both top RD play in lesser men’s leagues that teams don’t draft a lot out of, therefore it’s tough to gauge their production.

Cooley did do well in the U18 tournament, but he didn’t blow the doors off of it. It felt like it did more to raise the stock of players who were getting overshadowed (Howard, McGroaty, Chesley) rather than push Cooley to 1OA.

The Djurgardens trio lit it up, particularly on the PP, but they won’t go up that much further.

Another CHL player passing him? Geekie isn’t lighting it up in the playoffs either (just going by scoreboard watching with that).

I’ve heard the same argument from others that about him being a physically mature player. Saying he’ll be a disappointing pick is different than saying he’ll fall out of the top 5 though.

He’s a two-way center with a great shot and good size, I don’t see such a meat and potatoes pick falling out of fashion because he hasn’t set the world on fire. (Especially with the current challengers.) Kirby Dach had worse numbers but got picked 3OA because he was a couple inches taller (I being unfair to Dach here, because he seemed to have more skill than his numbers had shown, but being a tall C was a huge plus too).

Top centers are simply too valuable and to critical a position for Wright not to sell high, like Beniers last year.
Agree with the spirit of this post. Wright is an overwhelmingly likely #1 overall pick. None of the other guys you mentioned even have a chance, except perhaps Slafkovsky and Jiricek, and that would only be if the Devils wound up with the top pick.
 

StevenToddIves

Registered User
May 18, 2013
11,077
27,989
Brooklyn, NY
His overall skillset and all around game is the best. You keep talking about his production like it’s a negative and well it wasn’t anything special it’s still very good in his draft year and better than pretty much everyone else’s. He is also considered to be a very defensively responsible and a good all around forward.

Cooley is not even remotely a threat to Wright as the number 1 spot. If he kept on improving on the first half of his season maybe he could’ve been. But there’s been draft eligibles on his own team who have been better than him and people who think he may not even be the best prospect on his own team. Slafkovsky might be with the potential he has and his strong finish.
Wrights pedigree and what he did prior to this season is certainly part of it because he has been really good for a while and even though people may have hoped for more from him nobody else has outdone him this season or done enough to have surpassed him.

That is far from the only reason though. In saying that some other top prospects have likely beaten him in at least one aspect you’re probably right. But the important part is the one aspect part. Others may be better than him at 1 or 2 things but not that much better and than he is better than them at everything else. There’s no holes in his game. He’s a strong skater, smart player, responsible player, with good size, and a wicked shot that he hasn’t been able to score with as much as you would expect this season.

It’s not necessarily that Wright has done something great this season to separate himself and is probably more that he came in ahead as the consensus number 1 and no one else has done anything to catch or surpass him and he posses the best all-around game.

If this discussion was just about pure potential I could understand arguments that certain other top prospects have equal or even better high-end potential. But Wright has high-end potential and where his separation comes in is when you realize that he is definitely the safest pick in the draft.

It is very likely that whoever takes Wright will have a top 5 player in this draft 10 years from now. Or at least close to that.
Shane Wright has the highest floor in the entire draft. If he barely progresses from where he is now, he'll be one hell of a 3C at the NHL level. If he doesn't come close to his ceiling, he'll still be a good 2C. Though I don't see Wright's upside as high as Slafkovsky or Jiricek, Shane is still the surest bet in this draft.
 

Guttersniped

I like goalies who stop the puck
Sponsor
Dec 20, 2018
22,675
50,599
You might not personally be high on Wright, which is subjective but of course absolutely your opinion and your right. However, the only way he doesn't go #1 overall is if the Devils win the lottery and then decide not to trade the pick. Every other team in the lottery needs a top 6 center, and Wright is the consensus #1, and it's not close.

Can you see Montreal passing on Wright -- having only one legit top 6 C in the organization (Suzuki) and risking the unabashed wrath of an entire fanbase for going off the board with new management? Or Arizona, the thinnest organization up the middle in the entire NHL and desperate for a marquee star? Philadelphia? Columbus? Chicago? There's just no way these teams would win the lottery and not take Wright.

I suppose we can say Seattle is a wild-card, but it's tough to see them passing up on a potential 1/1A C duo of Wright and Beniers for the next decade-plus. The Devils are the *only* team who would create some intrigue at #1, because Hughes is a greater talent than Wright and Wright's skill-set is not dissimilar from Hischier. I think at #1 the Devils would either trade down or, unable to find a deal, decide between Slafkovsky and Jiricek.
Post automatically merged:


Agree with the spirit of this post. Wright is an overwhelmingly likely #1 overall pick. None of the other guys you mentioned even have a chance, except perhaps Slafkovsky and Jiricek, and that would only be if the Devils wound up with the top pick.

In @Lou Bloom ’s defense, he was only discussing his own lack of enthusiasm and rankings not the actual eventual draft. It was a little vague (though the drop was so unlikely I should have probably assumed that.)

I thought that might have been the case too, I just got on a roll and didn’t mention that lol.
 
  • Like
Reactions: StevenToddIves

PKs Broken Stick

Registered User
Oct 9, 2008
9,657
5,076
If the Rangers do draft Jack Hughes, I might get really bad migraines.
Post automatically merged:

They are definitely going to get another very good prospect out of this draft, assuming they don't go super off the board.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Guttersniped

Lou Bloom

Registered User
Oct 14, 2020
1,046
1,998
His overall skillset and all around game is the best. You keep talking about his production like it’s a negative and well it wasn’t anything special it’s still very good in his draft year and better than pretty much everyone else’s. He is also considered to be a very defensively responsible and a good all around forward.

Cooley is not even remotely a threat to Wright as the number 1 spot. If he kept on improving on the first half of his season maybe he could’ve been. But there’s been draft eligibles on his own team who have been better than him and people who think he may not even be the best prospect on his own team. Slafkovsky might be with the potential he has and his strong finish.
Wrights pedigree and what he did prior to this season is certainly part of it because he has been really good for a while and even though people may have hoped for more from him nobody else has outdone him this season or done enough to have surpassed him.

That is far from the only reason though. In saying that some other top prospects have likely beaten him in at least one aspect you’re probably right. But the important part is the one aspect part. Others may be better than him at 1 or 2 things but not that much better and than he is better than them at everything else. There’s no holes in his game. He’s a strong skater, smart player, responsible player, with good size, and a wicked shot that he hasn’t been able to score with as much as you would expect this season.

It’s not necessarily that Wright has done something great this season to separate himself and is probably more that he came in ahead as the consensus number 1 and no one else has done anything to catch or surpass him and he posses the best all-around game.

If this discussion was just about pure potential I could understand arguments that certain other top prospects have equal or even better high-end potential. But Wright has high-end potential and where his separation comes in is when you realize that he is definitely the safest pick in the draft.

It is very likely that whoever takes Wright will have a top 5 player in this draft 10 years from now. Or at least close to that.
I very much disagree that his overall skillset and game are the best. I'd argue outside of his shot and composure that the rest of his game on the ice is fairly average for a top 10 prospect. His skating isn't anything to write home about, he's capable of making the simple plays and work off his teammates but you rarely see him using his own skills and creativity to create offense and break down a defense like some of the other forwards are capable of in this class. I have questions if he has the skillset to drive play at the NHL level and if he's not just someone who you'll have to pair with a playmaking winger and allow him to focus on the dirty work and getting in position to utilize his shot.

Maybe he's not a threat due to perception but my argument is that Cooley has shown a more impressive and translatable skillset than Wright has and should be in consideration for whatever team gets the #1 pick. I'd argue Cooley's skillset fits very well with that of players like Hughes and Zegras as far dynamic playmaking forwards with speed and skill and I have less questions about Cooley than I have on Wright.

I'm not sure I'd agree that Wright has high-end potential (at least relative to the other top prospects in the class) and I'm not even sure I'd call him the safest pick in this class. How many times do we see prospects who are known as safe or risk free bust? Alexis Lafreniere was a much more herald prospect with a better skillset and production and yet not even two years later he wouldn't even go top 5 in a redraft, yet a less impressive prospect in Wright is very likely to be a top 5 player in this draft?
 
  • Like
Reactions: StevenToddIves

Lou Bloom

Registered User
Oct 14, 2020
1,046
1,998
You might not personally be high on Wright, which is subjective but of course absolutely your opinion and your right. However, the only way he doesn't go #1 overall is if the Devils win the lottery and then decide not to trade the pick. Every other team in the lottery needs a top 6 center, and Wright is the consensus #1, and it's not close.

Can you see Montreal passing on Wright -- having only one legit top 6 C in the organization (Suzuki) and risking the unabashed wrath of an entire fanbase for going off the board with new management? Or Arizona, the thinnest organization up the middle in the entire NHL and desperate for a marquee star? Philadelphia? Columbus? Chicago? There's just no way these teams would win the lottery and not take Wright.

I suppose we can say Seattle is a wild-card, but it's tough to see them passing up on a potential 1/1A C duo of Wright and Beniers for the next decade-plus. The Devils are the *only* team who would create some intrigue at #1, because Hughes is a greater talent than Wright and Wright's skill-set is not dissimilar from Hischier. I think at #1 the Devils would either trade down or, unable to find a deal, decide between Slafkovsky and Jiricek.
Post automatically merged:


Agree with the spirit of this post. Wright is an overwhelmingly likely #1 overall pick. None of the other guys you mentioned even have a chance, except perhaps Slafkovsky and Jiricek, and that would only be if the Devils wound up with the top pick.
I was talking about my disagreement with him being a consensus #1 overall, not whether or not he'll go #1 overall in the actual draft or not. But even then I wouldn't be surprised if Cooley or Slafkovsky pick up steam in the pre draft process and actually give Wright a run for his money. While I'd disagree I don't really have a problem if someone has Wright as the best prospect in this class, I think the top 10 is close enough in talent that an argument can be made for any of them to be the best prospect in this class. My contention is with the idea that Wright should be the unanimous and unquestioned 1st overall pick when I don't see that talent worthy of that distinction.
 
  • Like
Reactions: StevenToddIves

Captain3rdLine

Registered User
Sep 24, 2020
7,616
8,857
How many times do we see prospects who are known as safe or risk free bust? Alexis Lafreniere was a much more herald prospect with a better skillset and production and yet not even two years later he wouldn't even go top 5 in a redraft, yet a less impressive prospect in Wright is very likely to be a top 5 player in this draft?
Ummm the part I bolded is dumb and completely untrue. He would definitely still go top 5 and although some others have gotten more opportunity and started hotter Lafreniere could still very liked be an elite first line winger and one of the best in the league. The only ones at this point who could have an argument to go ahead of him in a redraft are the ones that have had a very good start to their careers so far in Stutzle, Raymond, Lundell, and maybe but even they may not all have passed him at this point. If you’re suggesting Lafreniere is a bust already that’s just silly. It’s also ignoring how well Lafreniere has done with the limited ice time and opportunity he’s gotten.


Otherwise we just completely disagree on our assessments of Wright, Cooley and some others clearly. But he is widely seen as the number one prospect by the scouting community and that isn’t because he doesn’t have high-end potential.
 
Last edited:

Lou Bloom

Registered User
Oct 14, 2020
1,046
1,998
Ummm the part I bolded is dumb and completely untrue. He would definitely still go top 5 and although some others have gotten more opportunity and started hotter Lafreniere could still very liked be an elite first line winger and one of the best in the league. The only ones at this point who could have an argument to go ahead of him in a redraft are the ones that have had a very good start to their careers so far in Stutzle, Raymond, and Lundell but even they may not all have passed him at this point. If you’re suggesting Lafreniere is a bust already that’s just silly. It’s also ignoring how well Lafreniere has done with the limited ice time and opportunity he’s gotten.


Otherwise we just completely disagree on our assessments of Wright, Cooley and some others clearly. But he is widely seen as the number one prospect by the scouting community and that isn’t because he doesn’t have high-end potential.
Not suggesting he's a bust, I'm just showing a scenario where a prospect that was seen as a no doubt elite winger, consensus best prospect and who was much more impressive as a prospect than Wright has seen his stock drop in just two years time and there's legit questions now about how good Lafreniere will be when the idea two years ago of him being anything less than an elite winger was unthinkable to many. I think it's fair to say that his stock has dropped and that most people expected more than 52 points in 135 games played.

I never disagreed that he is seen as the number one prospect by most, I disagreed with the idea that he should be seen that way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Captain3rdLine

Captain3rdLine

Registered User
Sep 24, 2020
7,616
8,857
Not suggesting he's a bust, I'm just showing a scenario where a prospect that was seen as a no doubt elite winger, consensus best prospect and who was much more impressive as a prospect than Wright has seen his stock drop in just two years time and there's legit questions now about how good Lafreniere will be when the idea two years ago of him being anything less than an elite winger was unthinkable to many. I think it's fair to say that his stock has dropped and that most people expected more than 52 points in 135 games played.

I never disagreed that he is seen as the number one prospect by most, I disagreed with the idea that he should be seen that way.
Yeah that’s all fine and fair to say even though I disagree with your view on him as a prospect.
But even though Lafreniere’s stock has dropped he will still very likely be a very good or elite winger and would almost certainly go top 5 in a redraft right now. I could understand arguments for Stutzle, Raymond, and Lundell and Jarvis to a lesser extent. But I think he would still likely go top 3 in a redraft based on his skillset, how good of a prospect he was coming in and how he’s done in a limited role with limited opportunity.

I think if he was in a situation like Raymond in Detroit where he’s playing on the top line with Dylan Larkin and the top powerplay I’d bet that he’s doing significantly better production wise. He’s done very well in a limited role and has shown lots of flashes of his talent and actually did very well for a bit when he was given an opportunity further up the lineup.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Guttersniped

StevenToddIves

Registered User
May 18, 2013
11,077
27,989
Brooklyn, NY
Yeah that’s all fine and fair to say even though I disagree with your view on him as a prospect.
But even though Lafreniere’s stock has dropped he will still very likely be a very good or elite winger and would almost certainly go top 5 in a redraft right now. I could understand arguments for Stutzle, Raymond, and Lundell and Jarvis to a lesser extent. But I think he would still likely go top 3 in a redraft based on his skillset, how good of a prospect he was coming in and how he’s done in a limited role with limited opportunity.

I think if he was in a situation like Raymond in Detroit where he’s playing on the top line with Dylan Larkin and the top powerplay I’d bet that he’s doing significantly better production wise. He’s done very well in a limited role and has shown lots of flashes of his talent and actually did very well for a bit when he was given an opportunity further up the lineup.
The 2020 draft is a goods example of why we need to have some patience with prospects, even high-end ones. Jake Sanderson could wind up the best player in the class and has yet to play a game in the NHL. Quinton Byfield can wind up the best player in the draft and has 11 career points. Or how about Askarov?

As for Lafreniere, he's a LW who was drafted by a team which was ridiculously deep at LW. He's barely gotten PP time and has been shuffled all over the bottom 3 lines. I would not be shocked if he was traded this off-season for the center the Rangers sorely need. He's the classic change-of-scenery guy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Captain3rdLine

goonybird

Young boy expert
Jul 9, 2015
4,811
3,293
Wright scored at a 77-pt pace as a 15/16 year old, missed an entire season, and scored at a 101 pt pace with good 2-way chops. His numbers blow other draft-eligible OHLers out of the water. He's got a cannon for a shot, plays center (right handed to boot), and has pretty solid size.

1651584403111.png


I have a hard time believing he's not the consensus 1OA.
 

StevenToddIves

Registered User
May 18, 2013
11,077
27,989
Brooklyn, NY
Here's a pitch-perfect example of how NOT to do a mock draft. Don't study the teams, don't study the players. Basically, this guy did a slight variance of consensus rankings and plugged in team names in front of the players, and then he was somehow paid for it.


Brad Lambert and Gleb Trikozov are listed at LW despite not being left-shots and, um, not ever playing left wing. Liam Ohgren however is a LW and so is Ivan Miroshnichenko -- and they're both listed at center.

This dude has Buffalo taking a LD in the 1st round. This may have been the worst call in a mock draft which only succeeds as comedy. They have #1 overall LDs Dahlin and Power, plus another 1st rounder in Ryan Johnson, and they're going to pass on major needs in literally every other area to reach for Denton Mateychuk at #16? Yikes.

You don't even want to know about the Devils pick.

Anyway, just another opportunity to tell you guys that this dude got paid actual money for this, and I work for you for free.
 

PizzaAndPucks

New Jersey Angels diehard
Nov 29, 2018
2,955
4,704
This is the 1st draft in awhile where beading into it I'm not to concerned in the back of my mind about us drafting an organizational need per say. I was skeptical about drafting Luke last year just to appease Jack for a long term deal but as it turns out it looks like a good pick so far even though we need right shot d men more tha left. Seeing Smith struggle his 2nd year makes the Luke pick even that much more important. Going into this draft I'd prefer a Defensman but I won't complain if we somehow wind up with Savoie , Coolry or Slafkovsk. We have a alot of young forwards on the team but getting another potential top line forward couldn't hurt. Slafovsky is that big bodied skilled player that could work wonders in our top 6 if he pans out , a player like Miko Rantanen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: My3Sons

Poppy Whoa Sonnet

J'Accuse!
Jan 24, 2007
7,611
8,271
This is the 1st draft in awhile where beading into it I'm not to concerned in the back of my mind about us drafting an organizational need per say. I was skeptical about drafting Luke last year just to appease Jack for a long term deal but as it turns out it looks like a good pick so far even though we need right shot d men more tha left. Seeing Smith struggle his 2nd year makes the Luke pick even that much more important. Going into this draft I'd prefer a Defensman but I won't complain if we somehow wind up with Savoie , Coolry or Slafkovsk. We have a alot of young forwards on the team but getting another potential top line forward couldn't hurt. Slafovsky is that big bodied skilled player that could work wonders in our top 6 if he pans out , a player like Miko Rantanen.
Very different than my take. I'm basically at the point where I think if they don't walk away with one of Jiricek, Nemec, or Slafkovsky assuming they are available it's a major missed opportunity. So much so they really have to explore trading the 1st if they win the lottery, or go off the board.
 

StevenToddIves

Registered User
May 18, 2013
11,077
27,989
Brooklyn, NY
This is the 1st draft in awhile where beading into it I'm not to concerned in the back of my mind about us drafting an organizational need per say. I was skeptical about drafting Luke last year just to appease Jack for a long term deal but as it turns out it looks like a good pick so far even though we need right shot d men more tha left. Seeing Smith struggle his 2nd year makes the Luke pick even that much more important. Going into this draft I'd prefer a Defensman but I won't complain if we somehow wind up with Savoie , Coolry or Slafkovsk. We have a alot of young forwards on the team but getting another potential top line forward couldn't hurt. Slafovsky is that big bodied skilled player that could work wonders in our top 6 if he pans out , a player like Miko Rantanen.
I would say the opposite. This is a draft in which the Devils have a major opportunity to fill several organizational needs, as player-types the organization is desperate for will be available with several picks.

The Devils have neglected RD -- foolishly -- in the past two drafts when they had several viable options available to them. This is biting the team right now, as they have one opening this year with Subban gone and another one impending next year with the end of the Severson contract. Fortunately, the Devils have a very good chance at two franchise-type RD in David Jiricek or Simon Nemec. In the 2nd and 3rd round, there are several more intriguing names, notably Sam Rinzel, Maveric Lamoureux and Noah Warren.

Were the Devils to pass on a Jiricek or Nemec for a Savoie or Cooley (which is extremely unlikely), it would be catastrophic. As good as those two centers are, where do they fit in a future Devils depth chart? Neither is supplanting Hughes or Hischier as a top 6 center, and though Savoie has shown he can also play RW, he doesn't offer the elite shooting of Holtz or the complete game of Mercer. It's a worst case scenario for Savoie and a complication for the Devils at the expense of an obvious need at RD. As for Cooley, he has little experience at LW, and he's another forward who does his best work on the perimeter when the Devils need interior forwards.

It is for this reason why Juraj Slafkovsky must interest the Devils. The idea of an elite-skilled, 6'4 power forward playing on a top line with Hughes or Hischier is extremely compelling. Slafkovsky does his best work in the interior and creates room for high-skill linemates, which is contrary to Savoie or Cooley who also need the puck and like to play it around the perimeter. Now, this is not an insult to Savoie or Cooley -- both great players -- but their talents are redundant to Hughes and Bratt and Hischier. Who is going to screen goalies and bang home rebounds? Who is going to create more room down low and win battles down low? Slafkovsky answers these questions, while these questions prevail with a pick of Cooley or Savoie.

It is for this reason that, if Jiricek, Nemec and Slafkovsky are all gone when the Devils pick, I would prefer either Nazar or Gauthier, both of whom feature a more interior style to their game.

The Devils certainly also need center depth, but they need more bottom-6 types who can be found in later rounds. I have repeatedly espoused the talents of such sleepers as Logan Morrison, Brennan Ali, Liam Arnsby, Topi Ronni and Alex Kaskimaki -- all of whom would be great fits later in the draft. With the 1st round pick, it's pretty imperative the Devils fit a need.

I get the "best available player" philosophy. But it must be tempered to some degree. If the Kansas City Chiefs are picking in the first round and the best available player is a quarterback, should they still take him? Obviously not, because they have a 26 year old superstar there in Pat Mahomes -- so the smart thing to do would be to take the next best player, or to trade down. This is sort of the situation with the Devils and top 6 centers or LD -- they're set at those spots for a very long time. The Devils have major needs at 4 spots, and with 9 picks they must address all of them --

1 Right Defensemen
2 Interior/Power Forwards
3 Depth/Bottom 6 centers
4 Goaltending

I think it's okay to use a couple of the later picks on "luxury" picks. If NJ is picking in the 3th round and a small, skill center with big upside like Noah Ostlund is still there? Then, sure -- grab him. If they're picking in the 4th round and potential top-4 LD Arseni Koromyslov is still there? Then, fine, grab him. But the Devils also have to go into the draft with a strategy of filling some serious needs.
 

StevenToddIves

Registered User
May 18, 2013
11,077
27,989
Brooklyn, NY
I'm like an FC Hockey mock draft cheat code.

6
new-jersey-devils.svg

JIRICEK DAVID
RD
HC PLZEN
CZECHIA
CZE.svg


38
new-jersey-devils.svg

PEREVALOV ALEXANDER
RW
LOKO YAROSLAVL
MHL
RUS.svg


70
new-jersey-devils.svg

WARREN NOAH
RD
GATINEAU OLYMPIQUES
QMJHL
CAN.svg


102
new-jersey-devils.svg

SCHAEFER REID
LW
SEATTLE THUNDERBIRDS
WHL
CAN.svg


109
new-jersey-devils.svg

RINZEL SAM
RD
CHASKA HIGH
USHS-MN
USA.svg


113
new-jersey-devils.svg

ARNSBY LIAM
C
NORTH BAY BATTALION
OHL
CAN.svg


140
new-jersey-devils.svg

SEMINOFF MATTHEW
RW
KAMLOOPS BLAZERS
WHL
USA.svg


166
new-jersey-devils.svg

PETROVSKY SERVAC
C/LW
OWEN SOUND ATTACK
OHL
SVK.svg


198
new-jersey-devils.svg

ZHIGALOV IVAN
G
SHERBROOKE PHOENIX
QMJHL
BLR.svg
 
  • Like
Reactions: My3Sons and nugg

Eggtimer

Registered User
Jul 4, 2011
15,066
12,132
Calgary Alberta
I'm like an FC Hockey mock draft cheat code.

6
new-jersey-devils.svg

JIRICEK DAVID
RD
HC PLZEN
CZECHIA
CZE.svg


38
new-jersey-devils.svg

PEREVALOV ALEXANDER
RW
LOKO YAROSLAVL
MHL
RUS.svg


70
new-jersey-devils.svg

WARREN NOAH
RD
GATINEAU OLYMPIQUES
QMJHL
CAN.svg


102
new-jersey-devils.svg

SCHAEFER REID
LW
SEATTLE THUNDERBIRDS
WHL
CAN.svg


109
new-jersey-devils.svg

RINZEL SAM
RD
CHASKA HIGH
USHS-MN
USA.svg


113
new-jersey-devils.svg

ARNSBY LIAM
C
NORTH BAY BATTALION
OHL
CAN.svg


140
new-jersey-devils.svg

SEMINOFF MATTHEW
RW
KAMLOOPS BLAZERS
WHL
USA.svg


166
new-jersey-devils.svg

PETROVSKY SERVAC
C/LW
OWEN SOUND ATTACK
OHL
SVK.svg


198
new-jersey-devils.svg

ZHIGALOV IVAN
G
SHERBROOKE PHOENIX
QMJHL
BLR.svg
This will change on May 10th when we win the lotto and bugger up the list. I guess the bottom few picks stay but wen we take Slaf, the need for RHD will skyrocket
 
  • Like
Reactions: StevenToddIves

StevenToddIves

Registered User
May 18, 2013
11,077
27,989
Brooklyn, NY
This will change on May 10th when we win the lotto and bugger up the list. I guess the bottom few picks stay but wen we take Slaf, the need for RHD will skyrocket
I'm just happy if the Devils don't fall from the #5 spot, to be honest. I feel there the Devils get one of the RD in Jiricek or Nemec, as I feel there is a very strong chance Slafkovsky and Cooley take 2 of the top 4 picks along with (obviously) Wright.

At #6 or later, it's nail-biting time.
 

Eggtimer

Registered User
Jul 4, 2011
15,066
12,132
Calgary Alberta
I'm just happy if the Devils don't fall from the #5 spot, to be honest. I feel there the Devils get one of the RD in Jiricek or Nemec, as I feel there is a very strong chance Slafkovsky and Cooley take 2 of the top 4 picks along with (obviously) Wright.

At #6 or later, it's nail-biting time.
Yes , from the tons of mocks I have seen plus other teams needs, it seems like the 5th pick is almost a must in order to get one of the two D. #6 Would probably put us out of reach . It is huge we get at least 5th (though we are getting #1 or 2 so we are fine )
 
  • Like
Reactions: PizzaAndPucks

Guttersniped

I like goalies who stop the puck
Sponsor
Dec 20, 2018
22,675
50,599
I would say the opposite. This is a draft in which the Devils have a major opportunity to fill several organizational needs, as player-types the organization is desperate for will be available with several picks.

The Devils have neglected RD -- foolishly -- in the past two drafts when they had several viable options available to them. This is biting the team right now, as they have one opening this year with Subban gone and another one impending next year with the end of the Severson contract. Fortunately, the Devils have a very good chance at two franchise-type RD in David Jiricek or Simon Nemec. In the 2nd and 3rd round, there are several more intriguing names, notably Sam Rinzel, Maveric Lamoureux and Noah Warren.

Were the Devils to pass on a Jiricek or Nemec for a Savoie or Cooley (which is extremely unlikely), it would be catastrophic. As good as those two centers are, where do they fit in a future Devils depth chart? Neither is supplanting Hughes or Hischier as a top 6 center, and though Savoie has shown he can also play RW, he doesn't offer the elite shooting of Holtz or the complete game of Mercer. It's a worst case scenario for Savoie and a complication for the Devils at the expense of an obvious need at RD. As for Cooley, he has little experience at LW, and he's another forward who does his best work on the perimeter when the Devils need interior forwards.

It is for this reason why Juraj Slafkovsky must interest the Devils. The idea of an elite-skilled, 6'4 power forward playing on a top line with Hughes or Hischier is extremely compelling. Slafkovsky does his best work in the interior and creates room for high-skill linemates, which is contrary to Savoie or Cooley who also need the puck and like to play it around the perimeter. Now, this is not an insult to Savoie or Cooley -- both great players -- but their talents are redundant to Hughes and Bratt and Hischier. Who is going to screen goalies and bang home rebounds? Who is going to create more room down low and win battles down low? Slafkovsky answers these questions, while these questions prevail with a pick of Cooley or Savoie.

It is for this reason that, if Jiricek, Nemec and Slafkovsky are all gone when the Devils pick, I would prefer either Nazar or Gauthier, both of whom feature a more interior style to their game.

The Devils certainly also need center depth, but they need more bottom-6 types who can be found in later rounds. I have repeatedly espoused the talents of such sleepers as Logan Morrison, Brennan Ali, Liam Arnsby, Topi Ronni and Alex Kaskimaki -- all of whom would be great fits later in the draft. With the 1st round pick, it's pretty imperative the Devils fit a need.

I get the "best available player" philosophy. But it must be tempered to some degree. If the Kansas City Chiefs are picking in the first round and the best available player is a quarterback, should they still take him? Obviously not, because they have a 26 year old superstar there in Pat Mahomes -- so the smart thing to do would be to take the next best player, or to trade down. This is sort of the situation with the Devils and top 6 centers or LD -- they're set at those spots for a very long time. The Devils have major needs at 4 spots, and with 9 picks they must address all of them --

1 Right Defensemen
2 Interior/Power Forwards
3 Depth/Bottom 6 centers
4 Goaltending

I think it's okay to use a couple of the later picks on "luxury" picks. If NJ is picking in the 3th round and a small, skill center with big upside like Noah Ostlund is still there? Then, sure -- grab him. If they're picking in the 4th round and potential top-4 LD Arseni Koromyslov is still there? Then, fine, grab him. But the Devils also have to go into the draft with a strategy of filling some serious needs.
246E6F4F-7E8E-43D7-AE4A-CA3FDB51544D.jpeg
 
  • Like
Reactions: StevenToddIves

HughJazz3dg

Registered User
Jun 27, 2011
1,767
399
Hey Steven! I really appreciate all your write ups. I was just curious about something you’ve suggested.

If the Devils won the lottery and had the first pick, your belief is that Fitz would most likely trade the pick. Do you believe Wright wouldn’t play left wing? He seems like he’d be a fantastic counterpart to Hughes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: StevenToddIves

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad