The Macho King
Back* to Back** World Champion
- Jun 22, 2011
- 49,060
- 29,938
I think McDonagh took a f***ing swan dive off of that cliff in the playoffs.You think McDonagh and Palat were gonna fall off cliffs this upcoming season? It’s not a vacuum where you can only have good young players. Yeah, we had some aging vets. But it’s not like they were a net negative on the team. Let’s ask this: next season, if we added a defenseman like Palat or McDonagh at the trade deadline, do you think we would be better equipped for a deep run? If the answer is yes, I seriously think we are making mistakes right now.
I totally understand keeping youth around. But when it undercuts the competitiveness of the team and harms our chances of winning the cup, that’s when you are just making foolish moves. With taht logic, should we jettison stamkos and hedman as soon as they get to their mid 30s? If they were in their mid 30s right now, would it be a good idea to trade them? Of course not.
Look, all I’m saying is that our perhaps most inconsistent defenseman is making more money than possibly the best defenseman in the league. And that we are no longer cup contenders with getting rid of McDonagh and Palat.
Palat has a few more years in him and honestly I think he's going to age well. But he wanted to get his bag and props to him for doing so - he f***ing earned it.
But no team loses "Cup Contender" status after losing their like 6th and 9th best players. Depth is going to hurt a bit, but those are not irreplaceable roles. It's not like we're losing f***ing Hedman here.
And Stamkos and Hedman are both no doubt first ballot hall of famers, with Hedman making a legitimate run for top 20 defenseman in the history of hockey. McDonagh is not that. Palat is not that.
God damn when did McDonagh get so overrated?