Seb
All we are is Dustin Byfuglien
- Jul 15, 2006
- 17,792
- 14,104
If they pick Warren instead of Hutson I wouldn't be pleased. We need high ceiling players.
I'm surprised that Cooley actually has almost double the votes of Slafkovsky at the moment. Not because I don't think he's better, but more because it seemed like Slafkovsky was gaining momentum on these boards lately....But maybe its just the Slafkovsky fans were louder.
I still have a preference for Wright, and Cooley would be second for me.
Yeah Cooley could be the best of this group. Potential to be a dynamic player.I'm surprised that Cooley actually has almost double the votes of Slafkovsky at the moment. Not because I don't think he's better, but more because it seemed like Slafkovsky was gaining momentum on these boards lately....But maybe its just the Slafkovsky fans were louder.
I still have a preference for Wright, and Cooley would be second for me.
Don't know much about Hutson so this is a serious question. Everyone is high on Hutson's skating and zone exits but they worry about him clearing the front of the net and board battles because of his size. So my question is, isn't that what we had in Mete?I like it. Wright and Ostlund in round 1 would be great!!
But with the 33rd overall, I’d much rather go with Hutson over Warren if we are going defenseman. We have enough D prospects like Warren
lol...Where is our favourite Tiger anyways?One Slafkovsky fan
Don't know much about Hutson so this is a serious question. Everyone is high on Hutson's skating and zone exits but they worry about him clearing the front of the net and board battles because of his size. So my question is, isn't that what we had in Mete?
Like I said, I haven't followed or watched Hutson so I'm just curious as to what else he brings with his game.
lol...Where is our favourite Tiger anyways?
I'm surprised that Cooley actually has almost double the votes of Slafkovsky at the moment. Not because I don't think he's better, but more because it seemed like Slafkovsky was gaining momentum on these boards lately....But maybe its just the Slafkovsky fans were louder.
I still have a preference for Wright, and Cooley would be second for me.
ThanksHutson has a Makar like skill set. He's obviously not the same skater. But the elusiveness, the shot, the playmaking
Mete was a smooth skating defenseman who had puck moving ability but his offensive game didn't have much else to it.
It’s like some people kinda ignored the fact that it seems like Cooley always been in the habs conversation for the pick and got caught up in the Slafkovsky talk the medias pushed.
It’s like some people kinda ignored the fact that it seems like Cooley always been in the habs conversation for the pick and got caught up in the Slafkovsky talk the medias pushed.
Looking forward to it.Polishing his list of I told you so if we drafted Slafkovsky
I don't understand why we wouldn't go with Wright.
You either have High IQ or not as a prospect. I am terrified by low IQ players, often they have other attributes (size) but Hockey IQ should be the highest on the list of priorities.
I'd be ecstatic with Wright and Ostlund, but I wish we could trade up and pick Nemec along with Wright.