Prospect Info: 2022 Draft Prospects, Part II

  • HFBoards is well aware that today is election day in the US. We ask respectfully to focus on hockey and not politics.

StevenToddIves

Registered User
May 18, 2013
11,077
27,989
Brooklyn, NY
2022 Draft Profile:

C Paul Ludwinski, Kingston OHL

Ludwinski has gotten a lot of attention leading up to the 2022 draft, playing a valuable role for a high-profile Frontenacs squad which features the favorite for first overall in the draft in Shane Wright. Essentially, this is a kid everyone has gotten a good look at, and he's also a player who looks good. Ludwinski is a strong skater and playmaker who plays with a high compete level and terrific attention to two-way responsibility. He's generally ranked all over the 2nd round with a couple of 3rd round rankings and one anomalous 1st round spot from Elite Prospects (#31 overall).

Ludwinski undoubtedly possesses several of the elements which would project him to a regular role on an NHL bottom 6, but can he up the offense to be considered a middle 6 center candidate down the line? I think that's the question which creates the discrepancy between his 1st and 3rd round rankings. His production in the OHL has not exactly been eye-popping, with just 34 points in 61 games thus far. His shot needs a great deal of work and I have some concerns about his hands. Ludwinski can fumble the puck away when trying to deke and has some difficulty receiving hard passes, which has to create concerns about his scoring line potential.

However, his strengths are also notable. I cannot stress enough that this is a high-compete player who battles so hard in all areas of the ice that he can sometimes be guilty of biting off more than he can chew. Often, I'd rather see him try and bait defenders into making a mistake than nose-diving into a corner, where the 5'11-170 Ontario-native can often be pretty easily erased. I think the weight room will certainly up his overall game, since he is so tenacious in his general mindset. And it's also important not just to think of Ludwinski as a heart-and-soul guy, because he is a precision passer and playmaker with a very high offensive awareness.

This is certainly a guy to circle on draft day, I just wonder if I'd pick him as high as other draftniks would have him ranked. I find Ludwinski-like players are routinely available in the later rounds of drafts, and I have some difficulty justifying him in the #30-#45 range where I've seen him several times. Though I'm not ruling out his 2nd line upside and I certainly feel he has a high floor as a bottom-6 NHLer, I just don't see the offensive tool-kit as dynamic enough to justify a pick until the middle rounds. But again, this is a very good prospect and a kid who will be loved by his future NHL teammates and coaches.
 

Guttersniped

I like goalies who stop the puck
Sponsor
Dec 20, 2018
22,675
50,599
Questions after using the FCHockey Mock Draft Simulator.

Better: Yegor Gorbunov (F) vs Yegor Goryunov(F)?

Better: Yegor Yegorov (F) vs Yegor Yegorov (D)?

Is Dennis Good Bogg a good boggie?

Am I making fun of teen boys’ names? Sort of? That’s a lot of Yegor tho.
 

StevenToddIves

Registered User
May 18, 2013
11,077
27,989
Brooklyn, NY
Questions after using the FCHockey Mock Draft Simulator.

Better: Yegor Gorbunov (F) vs Yegor Goryunov(F)?

Better: Yegor Yegorov (F) vs Yegor Yegorov (D)?

Is Dennis Good Bogg a good boggie?

Am I making fun of teen boys’ names? Sort of? That’s a lot of Yegor tho.
You're going to have to answer for this post in Purgatory someday.
 

devilsblood

Registered User
Mar 10, 2010
30,295
12,647
Questions after using the FCHockey Mock Draft Simulator.

Better: Yegor Gorbunov (F) vs Yegor Goryunov(F)?

Better: Yegor Yegorov (F) vs Yegor Yegorov (D)?

Is Dennis Good Bogg a good boggie?

Am I making fun of teen boys’ names? Sort of? That’s a lot of Yegor tho.
what the heck is a good boggie?
 
  • Like
Reactions: StevenToddIves

Monsieur Verdoux

Registered User
Dec 6, 2016
2,102
3,349
Finland

The time has come again. My picks from the first three rounds were:

5. Juraj Slafkovsky
37. Ryan Chesley
69. Maveric Lamoureux

Yeah, this isn't realistic. I'd be really surprised if the Devils got anyone of them with those picks.

@StevenToddIves I read your player profile on Lamoureux. He sounds like the more bigger and meaner Ryan Graves to me. :laugh:
 

Goptor

Registered User
Jun 30, 2016
2,754
3,335

The time has come again. My picks from the first three rounds were:

5. Juraj Slafkovsky
37. Ryan Chesley
69. Maveric Lamoureux

Yeah, this isn't realistic. I'd be really surprised if the Devils got anyone of them with those picks.

@StevenToddIves I read your player profile on Lamoureux. He sounds like the more bigger and meaner Ryan Graves to me. :laugh:

Lou is going to take Lamoureux in the first round thinking that he's taking his long lost grandson from french Canada. (Lamoureux-lo)
 

Buck Dancer

Registered User
Jul 13, 2021
3,007
1,756

The time has come again. My picks from the first three rounds were:

5. Juraj Slafkovsky
37. Ryan Chesley
69. Maveric Lamoureux

Yeah, this isn't realistic. I'd be really surprised if the Devils got anyone of them with those picks.

@StevenToddIves I read your player profile on Lamoureux. He sounds like the more bigger and meaner Ryan Graves to me. :laugh:
Man, on my 1st attempt I won the lottery, traded down to #3 to pick Slafkosky and added a bunch of assets and traded back up to #13 to take Cutter Gauthier. I also had Ryan Chelsey at #45, Cruz Lucius at #101, etc...

I'd be okay with something like that lol
 

StevenToddIves

Registered User
May 18, 2013
11,077
27,989
Brooklyn, NY
If that list is any indication, it would be good news for us who want the Devils to draft Slaf.
It depends on who the consensus is including. Several draft writers base too much of their analysis on the statistical, and a couple even tend to grade against superficial things. Keep in mind what happened to Jake Sanderson's consensus ranking because a couple people ranked him in the teens with extremely dumb reasoning. I'd say the same about Edvinsson last year, except I was one of the people with the dumb reasoning.
 

StevenToddIves

Registered User
May 18, 2013
11,077
27,989
Brooklyn, NY

The time has come again. My picks from the first three rounds were:

5. Juraj Slafkovsky
37. Ryan Chesley
69. Maveric Lamoureux

Yeah, this isn't realistic. I'd be really surprised if the Devils got anyone of them with those picks.

@StevenToddIves I read your player profile on Lamoureux. He sounds like the more bigger and meaner Ryan Graves to me. :laugh:
There's no way you're getting any of those guys with any of those picks. But, in a wild hypothetical you just saved the Devils, so pat yourself on the back.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Monsieur Verdoux

StevenToddIves

Registered User
May 18, 2013
11,077
27,989
Brooklyn, NY

The time has come again. My picks from the first three rounds were:

5. Juraj Slafkovsky
37. Ryan Chesley
69. Maveric Lamoureux

Yeah, this isn't realistic. I'd be really surprised if the Devils got anyone of them with those picks.

@StevenToddIves I read your player profile on Lamoureux. He sounds like the more bigger and meaner Ryan Graves to me. :laugh:
I just tried it out myself. It's not as good as the FC Hockey one, except you can trade. I went four rounds, trading two of the 4th round picks to move up to #79 and get Trikozov. This was my draft:

5 LW Slafkovsky
37 RD Chesley
69 RD Rinzel
79 RW Trikozov
108 RD Warren

As you can see, once I made the extremely-unrealistic-but-still-awesome pick of Slafkovsky at #5 overall, I made my job filling the gaping organizational hole at RD while giving myself one "upside" guy to make myself happy. Realistic? No. Satisfying? Absolutely.
 

StevenToddIves

Registered User
May 18, 2013
11,077
27,989
Brooklyn, NY
Man, on my 1st attempt I won the lottery, traded down to #3 to pick Slafkosky and added a bunch of assets and traded back up to #13 to take Cutter Gauthier. I also had Ryan Chelsey at #45, Cruz Lucius at #101, etc...

I'd be okay with something like that lol
Haha, if that lottery is a game I think you just won it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MakoSlade

Guttersniped

I like goalies who stop the puck
Sponsor
Dec 20, 2018
22,675
50,599
I just tried it out myself. It's not as good as the FC Hockey one, except you can trade. I went four rounds, trading two of the 4th round picks to move up to #79 and get Trikozov. This was my draft:

5 LW Slafkovsky
37 RD Chesley
69 RD Rinzel
79 RW Trikozov
108 RD Warren

As you can see, once I made the extremely-unrealistic-but-still-awesome pick of Slafkovsky at #5 overall, I made my job filling the gaping organizational hole at RD while giving myself one "upside" guy to make myself happy. Realistic? No. Satisfying? Absolutely.

Ha ha, I aggressively addressed the lack RHD even more!

BC875B28-C85A-4489-AB91-8EC3A16EA2C2.jpeg
 

StevenToddIves

Registered User
May 18, 2013
11,077
27,989
Brooklyn, NY
2022 Draft Profile:

C Bryce McConnell-Barker, Soo OHL

One could say McConnell-Barker is a very rudimentary sort of player, but he is the type of player who is extremely coveted by NHL franchises. A two-way pivot with good size (6'1-190), very good skating and s strong fundamental foundation from which to grow on, BMB is extremely projectable as a middle-6 NHLer who can play up the middle in all situations. Though his likely scenario is as a 3rd liner, some scouts see second line upside due to the raw tools and relative youth (June '04), and he's received some pretty high rankings -- his consensus is probably in the mid-2nd round.

BMB is quick all over. His skates and his hands both move with the fast-twitch athleticism of a much smaller young man. When combined with a terrific compete level, this is a player who can seem like he's all over the ice at once. I think this shines the most on the defensive side of the puck, where BMB is active, engaged and effective in constantly frustrating opponents. For most opposing centers, he's bigger than you, stronger than you and works harder than you. BMB is a bit of a puck-hawk, very good at out-battling opponents and using stick checks and lifts to pick off pucks from opposing players who get over-confident with the puck.

BMB is a shoot-first player out of both choice and necessity. This is to say a couple things: foremost, he has a terrific shot. An economical and quick release ushers in a hard, heavy and accurate blast. Though not an elite sniper, this kid will certainly score some goals. But his propensity to shoot might also be the result of his major limitation offensively, which is he's not really a "vision" guy. Though BMB can certainly find and hit an open man, he's more of a functional passer than anything else. He's strictly north-south in he offensive zone and though he thinks the immediate play well, he does not think ahead of the play at all. This is not a slight on the player, he just is what he is, and he's good at what he is.

As such, I see Bryce McConnell-Barker as a high-floor, bottom 6 center. I have little doubt he will carve out a role in an NHL bottom 6 and be extremely effective in that role. However, several draft analysts and scouts see his relative youth and lost development season (2020-21 OHL pandemic cancellation) as an indication that "maybe there is something else there", hoping that with all his size and speed, the offense will come. Though I feel BMB will contribute offensively due to strong fundamental instincts, the size/speed and shot, I just don't see any latent offensive upside beyond that. He has a respectable 21-21-42 line in 63 OHL contests, but I don't foresee a big jump in the future. I absolutely draft a player like this in the 3rd/4th rounds, but someone will fall in love with his size/speed and two-way game, and I don't see him lasting past the 2nd.
 

forceten

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
Jul 15, 2004
5,238
6,222
Raleigh, NC
That draft simulator was fun! How’d I do? I made a couple trades of picks.
 

Attachments

  • B60B7E1B-5CD5-4E33-A405-7276F5F78257.jpeg
    B60B7E1B-5CD5-4E33-A405-7276F5F78257.jpeg
    306.1 KB · Views: 12
  • Like
Reactions: Guttersniped

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad