I’d be curious to see what our scouts’ board looks like. It seems like either guy is very possible with where we’ll likely be picking. I’d rather not have to choose and just pick who’s left.Jiricek>
I’d be curious to see what our scouts’ board looks like. It seems like either guy is very possible with where we’ll likely be picking. I’d rather not have to choose and just pick who’s left.
There you go.
Tyce Thompson, Nico Daws, Shara, I mentioned Rykov. Looks like Malek last year is another one.
We've had a lot of picks since Castron came on board, but I'd bet we drafted more "overagers" then any other team in that time.
He’s the guy
I've compared Nemec and Jiricek at length. I'm not sure it's a matter of who is better, so much as what you *like*, I guess. If you're going to go by who is better right now, we'd have to say Nemec, even though it's a bit unfair because Jiricek missed so much of this season with injury. If we're going to go with upside, it's probably Jiricek because he has zero physical limitations and it's just a matter of rounding out his game, much like Luke Hughes last year and Jake Sanderson the year prior.Based on what we like I imagine they're leaning towards the bigger and more physical Jiricek.
I would have to agree with @Hisch13r on this -- everything displayed and said by Tom Fitzgerald would have to make one feel that Jiricek would be the guy here. I honestly think it's possible he's as high as #1 or #2 overall on the Devils draft board, and no I do not feel that would be a stretch.I’d be curious to see what our scouts’ board looks like. It seems like either guy is very possible with where we’ll likely be picking. I’d rather not have to choose and just pick who’s left.
You’d think if NJ was going to pick so many oldagers they would have picked me already.2021: Hurtig was in his D+1 year. Malek was D+1. Bardakov was D+2, he’s 21. (3/7)
2020: Daws was D+1. Baumgartner was D+2. (2/8)
2019: Thompson was D+2 (1/11)
2018: Shara was D+2 (1/6)
2017: Hellickson was D+1. Senn was D+3 (2/11)
2016: Rykov was D+1. Davies was D+1 (2/9)
I don’t think we hit OA particularly hard before last year, they’re common enough among goalies and late picks. The earliest picks are Daws (#84) and Thompson (#96).
We have a bunch in the last two drafts, to the point where it’s going to thin our prospects out in the future, as it makes 2021 a light class, unless we hit this age group harder this year.
Our particular response to COVID was leaning into European overagers our scouts could watch a bunch. It would have been nice if we took a flyer on some the CHL talent that dropped, and went cheap in terms of draft value, but we didn’t. (I’m not a huge fan of what we did in that draft, but that’s life.)
Columbus picked an overager at #21, Yegor Chinakhov, in 2020 and 2 OAs out of 5 picks.
They had picked 3 OAs, out of 7 picks, in 2017 and 2 OAs, out of 5, in 2018. They had none in 2019 but only picked three players.
The biggest surprise is that there aren’t any in their nine 2021 picks. Three were 1sts, so that helps the odds, but you never know with Columbus.
I don’t know how many overagers are drafted per year though.
Should've been more, Rashevsky anyone?There you go.
Tyce Thompson, Nico Daws, Shara, I mentioned Rykov. Looks like Malek last year is another one.
We've had a lot of picks since Castron came on board, but I'd bet we drafted more "overagers" then any other team in that time.
Yeah, I can't think about Rashevsky. I ranked him higher than anyone in the world. We literally passed him over for Artem Shlaine and Ben Baumgartner in 2020 and for Salminen and Vilen in 2021. It's insane. Right now if you offered Winnipeg all four of those players for Rashevsky, they'd laugh you out of the room.Should've been more, Rashevsky anyone?
View attachment 529630
David Jiříček with the Czech National team.
Prospect board sleuths pointed out you can see the surgery scars by his knee.
I feel like this is some interesting stuff with Lassi's tracking. I wonder how Nemec would look now with a few months more to go off of. Nemec is far more involved in transition while Jiricek's far more involved defensively. Offensively here Jiricek has a very slight and basically negligible edge in cycle creation while Nemec is far better off the rush. This has helped me uphold my opinion of wanting Jiricek more considering I think the upside is higher and he's a better partner for Luke since Luke can handle the bulk of the transition work. That would negate Nemec's biggest advantage over Jiricek. Jiricek's defensive edge over Nemec would be a big plus to have alongside Luke
That bears out with what I've seen from both as well. I think Nemec's a great prospect in his own right but Jiricek has a chance to be a special talent. You're talking about a player that can be a true physical, shutdown minute eater, while also having the offensive skill to be one of the better offensive dman in the league. The only comparable I could even come up with is Mo Seider.
Yeah, Jiricek's the guy for me, too. But if the Devils pick 5 or 6 and Jiricek is gone, of course I'd think Nemec would be the pretty obvious pick there. They're both great players, but Jiricek has almost limitless upside in some senses, and his physicality is just so enticing and desperately needed by the Devils.That bears out with what I've seen from both as well. I think Nemec's a great prospect in his own right but Jiricek has a chance to be a special talent. You're talking about a player that can be a true physical, shutdown minute eater, while also having the offensive skill to be one of the better offensive dman in the league. The only comparable I could even come up with is Mo Seider.