McGees
Registered User
- Jun 15, 2016
- 13,968
- 27,786
He is leaning forward though. You'd have to have the balls lean forward too...Finally we can figure out Lane's height accurately.
Everyone knows that tennis balls are approx. 6.8cm diameter...
He is clearly 26 balls high...
That's 176.8 cm!
So easy maths tell us that...
Lane is still 5'8"
View attachment 600786View attachment 600787
You can add an inch because he's leaning down, and your balls are starting a bit higher than the floor, it looks like.Finally we can figure out Lane's height accurately.
Everyone knows that tennis balls are approx. 6.8cm diameter...
He is clearly 26 balls high...
That's 176.8 cm!
So easy maths tell us that...
Lane is still 5'8"
View attachment 600786View attachment 600787
He just really seems like the draft pick that in 5 years everyone is wondering why he was available when he was.
Slafkovsky, Mesar, Beck, Hutson.
Can’t get ahead of ourselves, but it’s possible we’ve hit the jackpot here. This feels like FOUR 1st round talents. Each one could be a core player in the future. That’s a potential franchise altering draft.
Would be nice to have found our next 2007.
2022 could honestly be the draft of the century for us. Slaf, Beck, Mesar, Hutson.
It's still so early but crazy to think about.
Me triggered? is that a joke? Here's a life lesson,if you can't take a joke,don't make a joke. I was merely making an attempt at some harmless ribbing,and here you go off half-cocked,Could you walk me through your whole logic, because it makes absolutely no sense.
I make a derison of guys who obsess over it and usually, those are the ones who are challenged.
Thanks for trying though.
To come up with that, you must've felt triggered and slighted, meaning you might actually belong to that category who obsess over it.
Even if he was a train wreck defensively, I'd still be pumped. Seems that that's not the case the little I've seen and heard.He moves like Connor f***ing McDavid lmao
Not too many people play with a shitfyness like that, but anyone who does, always seem to stand out as good hockey players
Treat to watch, treat to have him in the org. BIG plans baby
Pretty much. It's the difference between Euclidean distance and arclength. His spine is arched forward.You can add an inch because he's leaning down, and your balls are starting a bit higher than the floor, it looks like.
I heard, he not bad defensively, he uses his stick more than his body to defendEven if he was a train wreck defensively, I'd still be pumped. Seems that that's not the case the little I've seen and heard.
I saw a bit of pre-draft Q. Hughes and as great as he was, I don't think he had Hutson's raw skill. I could be wrong there. But hell who besides Makar has his shiftiness/skill package?
We have so many great pieces now it's crazy.
But he is wearing shoes.You can add an inch because he's leaning down, and your balls are starting a bit higher than the floor, it looks like.