Speculation: 2022-23 Sharks Roster Discussion Part II

Status
Not open for further replies.

Sendhelplease

Registered User
Dec 21, 2020
476
1,018
Agree with the POV of that Athletic article which is why I'm not TOO upset with 4th overall, we were pretty lucky to get that low despite the fact we had an opening to get a top 2 pick. Also agree losing Meier and Karlsson will be enough to push us down from the Athletics projections at the time, but still don't know if I think this team is top 3 pick bad...I think we land in the bottom 6 or 7 leaning closer to 7 than 1
I do think we have better center depth that most of the non playoff teams and I think that is what is truly holding the team back from finishing in last. Hertl and Couture as our top 2 centers is much better than teams like Anaheim, Chicago, Columbus, Detroit, Arizona, etc.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan

STL Shark

Registered User
Mar 6, 2013
4,407
5,475
Agree with the POV of that Athletic article which is why I'm not TOO upset with 4th overall, we were pretty lucky to get that low despite the fact we had an opening to get a top 2 pick. Also agree losing Meier and Karlsson will be enough to push us down from the Athletics projections at the time, but still don't know if I think this team is top 3 pick bad...I think we land in the bottom 6 or 7 leaning closer to 7 than 1
Chicago is better with Bedard (plus adding Hall, Perry, and Foligno - even with all being past their prime). CBJ is better without massive injuries plus adding Provorov and Severson. Anaheim is probably about the same, but slightly better with development of young players. Philly is much worse. Arizona about as bad. San Jose likely to be much worse on ice but about the same in standings points.

It’s a race to the bottom between SJ, PHI, ARI, and ANA. I don’t see many ways that this team finishes outside of the bottom 5 under virtually any circumstance.
 

The McMafia

Registered User
Sep 2, 2011
403
74
San Diego, CA
Agree with the POV of that Athletic article which is why I'm not TOO upset with 4th overall, we were pretty lucky to get that low despite the fact we had an opening to get a top 2 pick. Also agree losing Meier and Karlsson will be enough to push us down from the Athletics projections at the time, but still don't know if I think this team is top 3 pick bad...I think we land in the bottom 6 or 7 leaning closer to 7 than 1

If a third of the OT losses were switched to wins over the course of last season, the team wouldn't have sniffed the top 5. I think they got (un)lucky being unable to win in OT.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan

Eegs

Registered User
Jan 9, 2018
1,500
2,110
BC
Hey guys, I was scouring through this thread looking for what you guys thought your starting lineup will look like and I'm not having much luck.

The player I am interested in is Henry Thrun. Do you all think he plays with the Sharks next year, or is he AHL bound?

TIA!!
 

STL Shark

Registered User
Mar 6, 2013
4,407
5,475
Hey guys, I was scouring through this thread looking for what you guys thought your starting lineup will look like and I'm not having much luck.

The player I am interested in is Henry Thrun. Do you all think he plays with the Sharks next year, or is he AHL bound?

TIA!!
Depends a lot on what the Karlsson deal looks like and who it returns. If it’s Pittsburgh and POJ is part of the return, then Thrun is assuredly AHL bound barring another move to deal Ferraro.

I think Thrun is one of the 6 best defensemen, but handedness isn’t in his favor with a logjam of LHD and Muk on the way too. Think the Karlsson deal has to happen and have to see the return before any real lineup discussions can be had for 2023-24.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan and Eegs

TheWayToRefJose

Registered User
Oct 30, 2017
3,529
3,315
If a third of the OT losses were switched to wins over the course of last season, the team wouldn't have sniffed the top 5. I think they got (un)lucky being unable to win in OT.
But Timo and Karlsson literally willed OT into existence a lot of those games. Without EK65 and Timo, they don’t even get to OT for most of those games.
 

Random Comment

Registered User
Mar 5, 2018
839
1,252
What are realistic expectations for William Eklund the next few years. Is he still projected as elite talent, or just a good 60-70 point winger?
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Sandisfan

Cas

Conversational Black Hole
Sponsor
Jun 23, 2020
5,962
8,616
What are realistic expectations for William Eklund the next few years. Is he still projected as elite talent, or just a good 60-70 point winger?
Probably more the latter. There doesn't seem to be much chance he turns into an elite player, "merely" a very good one.

That's not an indictment of Eklund. We should be happy if we get a Forsberg, not upset that we didn't get a Kucherov.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan

StanleyCup2035

Registered User
Oct 1, 2017
1,338
1,735
Probably more the latter. There doesn't seem to be much chance he turns into an elite player, "merely" a very good one.

That's not an indictment of Eklund. We should be happy if we get a Forsberg, not upset that we didn't get a Kucherov.
Which Fosberg? Cause Peter scored 100+ too:
 
  • Like
Reactions: ChompChomp

Juxtaposer

Outro: Divina Comedia
Dec 21, 2009
50,191
24,068
Bay Area
If a third of the OT losses were switched to wins over the course of last season, the team wouldn't have sniffed the top 5. I think they got (un)lucky being unable to win in OT.
Absolutely. If the Sharks had league average goaltending and won half of their OT games, we’re probably barely in the top-10 of the draft. I think drafting 4th was incredibly lucky on the part of the Sharks.
 

Hodge

Registered User
Apr 27, 2021
6,804
8,079
I didn’t realize the Penguins can still technically but Granlund out since Drew O’Connor filed for arbitration. I think that means we could potentially make a Karlsson trade work by just taking back Jan Rutta, assuming the Sharks are on Petry’s no trade list.
 

Boy Hedican

Homer Jr, friends call me Ho-Ju
Jul 12, 2006
5,198
1,387
Earff
Im starting to not like this team, if he truly adds two more NHL players hes going to be drafting in that 9-15 range which is pointless.

They really need to trade karl quickly to not over inflate the wins. then be sure to burn it down with plenty of time left to sink back into the top 5.
What? Who have we added that adding a few more "NHLers" would be threatening us being a 9-15 pick range? lol.
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Sandisfan

Juxtaposer

Outro: Divina Comedia
Dec 21, 2009
50,191
24,068
Bay Area
I also think it could be argued they were incredibly lucky to get to OT in most of those games.
I would argue the opposite. How many times were the Sharks leading in the third period and gave up back-breaking goals to tie it? There were a ton of games that the Sharks should have won in regulation that ended up as OTLs.
 

CupfortheSharks

Registered User
Sponsor
Mar 31, 2008
2,892
1,787
San Jose
Teams, like last year’s Sharks, that don’t play a structured defense first game lend themselves to bad goaltending and giving up leads. It would absolutely amazing if any goaltender put up decent stats playing for us last year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hodge and landshark

Pinkfloyd

Registered User
Oct 29, 2006
71,631
15,325
Folsom
I would argue the opposite. How many times were the Sharks leading in the third period and gave up back-breaking goals to tie it? There were a ton of games that the Sharks should have won in regulation that ended up as OTLs.
There was ten times last season where the Sharks gave up the tying goal in the 3rd period to go to overtime. There were eight times last season where the Sharks scored the tying goal in the 3rd to get it to overtime.
 

Gecklund

Registered User
Jul 17, 2012
26,160
12,927
California
I would argue the opposite. How many times were the Sharks leading in the third period and gave up back-breaking goals to tie it? There were a ton of games that the Sharks should have won in regulation that ended up as OTLs.
Yes but also how many times did Sharks somehow score when they probably shouldn’t have? I might be misremembering but there were definitely times where they gave up grade A chance after grade A chance or would get hemmed in their zone for what felt like the whole game and somehow not get scored on.

I also think that while our depth might be a bit better this season than last, without Timo we are not going to be scoring many goals. Our defense is also worrisome to say the least.
 

STL Shark

Registered User
Mar 6, 2013
4,407
5,475
There was ten times last season where the Sharks gave up the tying goal in the 3rd period to go to overtime. There were eight times last season where the Sharks scored the tying goal in the 3rd to get it to overtime.
Great statistic. It’s easy as fans to see the luck going a singular direction when in reality (as it usually does in sports) the luck evens out over the course of a season.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad