Speculation: 2022-23 Sharks Roster Discussion Part II

Status
Not open for further replies.

gaucholoco3

Registered User
Jun 22, 2015
1,510
1,933
Would you still buy a $2 lottery ticket when you can trade that in for $100?

That’s the argument that is happening. Yes $100 doesn’t drastically change a person’s life but it is still worth a lot more than the expected value of the $2 lottery ticket. Could you will the million dollars, possibly but not likely but the $100 has value now.

Also in this case there is the chance that the $100 (Kunin) can turn into a million dollars. I would say he has a higher chance of being a core top 6 player than any 3rd round pick we draft. He was playing on a crap team adjusting to a new city/system and then got hurt. I think he is a player they need to complement the small skill players.
 

STL Shark

Registered User
Mar 6, 2013
4,408
5,476
Kunin also isn’t a C was the other issue. I also don’t think Kunin has first round potential.

I think a bit of it now too is seeing a guy like Gibson or Akey who are projected to be there early 3rd and saying I want one. It’s not even about Kunin either because I was advocating taking a chance on Kunin. Now I was saying for Labanc or Gregor or a 5th. To me though it just doesn’t make sense to give up a top 100 pick for a guy that you can get in FA.
It's a Sharks 3rd round pick. Why do we care what we got in return for it when the franchise has produced all of 1 NHL player in its entire existence from a 3rd round pick (Greiss).
 

landshark

They'll paint the donkey teal if you pay.
Sponsor
Mar 15, 2003
3,791
3,205
outer richmond dist
Kunin also isn’t a C was the other issue. I also don’t think Kunin has first round potential.

I think a bit of it now too is seeing a guy like Gibson or Akey who are projected to be there early 3rd and saying I want one. It’s not even about Kunin either because I was advocating taking a chance on Kunin. Now I was saying for Labanc or Gregor or a 5th. To me though it just doesn’t make sense to give up a top 100 pick for a guy that you can get in FA.
Lot of hindsight tho. You admittedly wanted to take a chance on Kunin at the time.

Sharks got him; he sucked, was injured and now you'd rather have the pick back or one of the other options that was available and also panned out better than Kunin.

When will you understand that the only time things go right for the Sharks is so they get far enough in the playoffs to get our hopes up so that it's a bigger fall from the peak to the chok? :sarcasm:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gecklund

Gecklund

Registered User
Jul 17, 2012
26,164
12,936
California
Lot of hindsight tho. You admittedly wanted to take a chance on Kunin at the time.

Sharks got him; he sucked, was injured and now you'd rather have the pick back or one of the other options that was available and also panned out better than Kunin.

When will you understand that the only time things go right for the Sharks is so they get far enough in the playoffs to get our hopes up so that it's a bigger fall from the peak to the chok? :sarcasm:
I mean I did dislike the price they paid at the time. Obviously gotta toot my own horn there :sarcasm:

No but I do think my thinking here is very hindsight skewed for sure and it’s very flawed in that way. I’m very much hoping we don’t make a similar move. I will say I did very much like the Kaut and Peterson moves (another two guys that I liked and advocated for!) It is entirely just at the time and even now it felt like Grier spent a buy high price on a buy low target and sacrificed a pick when it’s clear that Kunin wouldn’t make a difference one way or the other.
 
  • Like
Reactions: landshark

landshark

They'll paint the donkey teal if you pay.
Sponsor
Mar 15, 2003
3,791
3,205
outer richmond dist
I mean I did dislike the price they paid at the time. Obviously gotta toot my own horn there :sarcasm:

No but I do think my thinking here is very hindsight skewed for sure and it’s very flawed in that way. I’m very much hoping we don’t make a similar move. I will say I did very much like the Kaut and Peterson moves (another two guys that I liked and advocated for!) It is entirely just at the time and even now it felt like Grier spent a buy high price on a buy low target and sacrificed a pick when it’s clear that Kunin wouldn’t make a difference one way or the other.

toot toot!
beep beep! :D

That's totally fair, inflation is a bitch.


GMMG rolled the dice on Kunin and maybe crapped out on that one. I can kinda see what he saw potential-wise.

I really want the Sharks to become a player dev power house. Getting the most out of mediocre players means getting that 3rd for a guy that in hindsight will only be worth a 5th if it was all done over again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Gecklund

themelkman

Always Delivers
Apr 26, 2015
11,728
8,802
Calgary, Alberta
For me the Kunin trade isn’t the main problem but just a symptom of the problem that is getting guys based on connections and traits instead of scouting and data.

Who is he related to in the Sharks?
Nepotism doesn’t mean you have to be related to someone. Friends, coworkers, college teammates all count for that
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cas

landshark

They'll paint the donkey teal if you pay.
Sponsor
Mar 15, 2003
3,791
3,205
outer richmond dist
For me the Kunin trade isn’t the main problem but just a symptom of the problem that is getting guys based on connections and traits instead of scouting and data.


Nepotism doesn’t mean you have to be related to someone. Friends, coworkers, college teammates all count for that
Oh wow. TIL. I've only ever used that as family. I thought non-family was just "favoritism" Thx!

EDIT:
1687453720544.png


Seems like there's some room for interpretation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: themelkman

STL Shark

Registered User
Mar 6, 2013
4,408
5,476
Nepotism doesn’t mean you have to be related to someone. Friends, coworkers, college teammates all count for that
Even then, does playing 3/14 of his career in SJ when neither the current owner nor President were involved with the team even count as anything remotely close to any of that? It's not like we went and hired Marleau for GM because he spent basically his entire adult life with the organization.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sandisfan

Hodge

Registered User
Apr 27, 2021
6,838
8,125
For me the Kunin trade isn’t the main problem but just a symptom of the problem that is getting guys based on connections and traits instead of scouting and data.


Nepotism doesn’t mean you have to be related to someone. Friends, coworkers, college teammates all count for that
What connections did Grier have to Kunin before the trade? And isn’t identifying a player’s traits the point of scouting and data?
 
  • Like
Reactions: tiburon12

Barrie22

Shark fan in hiding
Aug 11, 2009
25,672
7,228
ontario
I hold nothing against him personally I just think it was a nepotism hire and I haven’t seen enough to change my mind from that yet
Good luck finding a GM, coach or anything without any sort of nepotism by your definition. Hockey is such small group of people in this world, hence why there is so many retreads for positions.
 

Sharkz4Fun

Registered User
Feb 8, 2023
864
867
The fact the some here are using the Kunin trade as some sort of barometer for Grier with all the positive moves he’s made here is laughable.
I'm truly neither hot or cold on Grier, but I haven't seen a single positive move from him so far, other than getting Burns out of here for his sake (certainly not the return). I've seen him make a lot of necessary moves, but I don't believe any of them can be called positive. He missed on every single FA signing regardless of what his motive was other than Sturm, and has been on the losing end of every somewhat significant trade he has made. I think he treaded water fine in his first year but how he does this offseason with Karlsson + other moves will allow him to be fairly judged. I think Karlsson should just be the start and that he really needs to move some of Ferraro/Vlasic/Labanc etc. or find another out because going into another season with all of this dead weight is not the sign of a great GM.
 
  • Like
Reactions: themelkman

TheBeard

He fixes the cable?
Jul 12, 2019
18,413
21,323
Vegass
I'm truly neither hot or cold on Grier, but I haven't seen a single positive move from him so far, other than getting Burns out of here for his sake (certainly not the return). I've seen him make a lot of necessary moves, but I don't believe any of them can be called positive. He missed on every single FA signing regardless of what his motive was other than Sturm, and has been on the losing end of every somewhat significant trade he has made. I think he treaded water fine in his first year but how he does this offseason with Karlsson + other moves will allow him to be fairly judged. I think Karlsson should just be the start and that he really needs to move some of Ferraro/Vlasic/Labanc etc. or find another out because going into another season with all of this dead weight is not the sign of a great GM.
How about Thrun? The Macdonald-Kaut-Nieto trade? Peterson for Reedy? Turning waiver wire Eyissimont into a 4th round pick? Getting a 4th for Megna?
 

Sharkz4Fun

Registered User
Feb 8, 2023
864
867
How about Thrun? The Macdonald-Kaut-Nieto trade? Peterson for Reedy? Turning waiver wire Eyissimont into a 4th round pick? Getting a 4th for Megna?
You named a bunch of non-significant depth moves that could be positive for the future. Remember how we thought Ferraro was going to be good after his first year? That could be Thrun. Thrun and Peterson definitely have the potential to be positive pieces, the Nieto trade was insignificant, and 4th round picks mean nothing, and I actually got a chuckle out of reading those two. I'd still rather have Eyissimont than a 4th.
 
  • Like
Reactions: themelkman

TheBeard

He fixes the cable?
Jul 12, 2019
18,413
21,323
Vegass
You named a bunch of non-significant depth moves that could be positive for the future. Remember how we thought Ferraro was going to be good after his first year? That could be Thrun. Thrun and Peterson definitely have the potential to be positive pieces, the Nieto trade was insignificant, and 4th round picks mean nothing, and I actually got a chuckle out of reading those two. I'd still rather have Eyissimont than a 4th.
From what I’m getting from your answers, you wanted Grier to just say “f*** it” and try and get all the all-stars available and win it all.
 
  • Like
Reactions: STL Shark
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad