Certainly a fascinating post, with concepts that I've not looked into deeply.
On reflection, I think you're also overcomplicating the macro-economic thinking too. Value is much more dynamic than the parameters you're setting here. The big picture is that Timo is the best available asset on the market right now, will improve any hockey team he goes to, and increase their chances of winning a cup.
Placing a value on that is arbitrary.
I accept Grier may not get as much as I'd like to see. But in the art of negotiation, since when has ever been asking for fair value gotten anything less than wanted?