PacificOceanPotion
Registered User
- Jun 19, 2009
- 6,191
- 5,018
As much as I loved Owen Nolan, I don’t think 11 is an untouchable #. 12 and 19 on the other hand
I’ll make some calls.Can we please simulate the rest of the offseason and start the new season already i miss hockey win or lose
Can we please simulate the rest of the offseason and start the new season already i miss hockey win or lose
There is another wayEspecially since that's the only way, as much as we opine here, we'll see how all this off season's change really measure up....or down....
I’ll make some calls.
There is another way
But it requires...
A great sacrifice...
Lol.
Meier only has value to teams he’s willing to sign a reasonable extension with that they can fit under the cap. This drastically limits the number of suitors and the likely return.If the Sharks are going to trade Meier, his value might be at its peak. Look at what the Sharks had to settle for with Burns, and recall that 2 years ago it was rumored that Carolina had offered a package of Pesce, Necas, and Dzingel for him...
This isn’t true. There’s likely those that would be happy to pay a one year rental’s price for Meier.Meier only has value to teams he’s willing to sign a reasonable extension with that they can fit under the cap. This drastically limits the number of suitors and the likely return.
So a late 1st and a B prospect. Doesn’t sound like peak value to me.This isn’t true. There’s likely those that would be happy to pay a one year rental’s price for Meier.
Why would they get peak value on Meier? The only reason they’d move him is because they don’t feel like he’ll sign long term.So a late 1st and a B prospect. Doesn’t sound like peak value to me.
DW f***ed this franchise over in so many ways not the least of which was the insane Meier QO.
Calgary got peak value for tkathuk.Why would they get peak value on Meier? The only reason they’d move him is because they don’t feel like he’ll sign long term.
If you say so. I don’t think it’s known what they got until they see what happens with Huberdeau and Weegar. The Sharks and Meier aren’t making waves about their negotiations or lack thereof so it’s unlikely to be a similar situation. Again, until they know Meier won’t stay, they likely will hang on to him as long as possible.Calgary got peak value for tkathuk.
They approached the trade in a totally different situation than SJ would based on where the rest of their roster is. Calgary wants to stay in their contention window even after losing Gaudreau and Tkachuk so they took players that are ready to help them win now rather than a heavy futures package.Calgary didn’t get a big return. They traded 1 year of Huber and Wagner for 1 year of Thuchuk, only getting a distant protected 1st and prospect. They could probably have gotten more than the 1st and prospect at the deadline if they held firm and forced him to sign his QO.
In your opinion, is this mock trade I did, too little in return for Meier?They approached the trade in a totally different situation than SJ would based on where the rest of their roster is. Calgary wants to stay in their contention window even after losing Gaudreau and Tkachuk so they took players that are ready to help them win now rather than a heavy futures package.
If they flame out and the new additions don't want to sign, Huberdeau alone will yield them a massive return of 2 first rounders and then more while Weegar also probably returns a 1st round pick. I'd assume CGY hopes to re-sign those guys, but if not and the team struggles then they have an easy pivot that makes the Tkachuk return look very good (i.e. could yield 4 first round picks by the time that they sell off a Huberdeau/Weegar on top of the pick they got from FLA).
If SJ moves Meier, it is not to try and win now or even next year and thus the package would be filled with guys that are going to be much younger and/or laden with draft picks for Grier/Fitzgerald to put their stamp on the prospect pool and organizational depth. He'd return a nice haul though no matter what and trading him is probably the best move compared to an 8 year $8.5 million contract.
I wouldn’t make that trade.In your opinion, is this mock trade I did, too little in return for Meier?
View attachment 572396
This feels like way too little. A number 4 D with one year left, an okay prospect that probably is around 4-6 in our pool, and a one round bump? Sounds bad.In your opinion, is this mock trade I did, too little in return for Meier?
View attachment 572396
Yeah, I don't know that a trade like that is really in the ballpark. I get attaching Labanc lowers the value, but I also don't think that Grier would do that and would instead ride out Labanc's contract since trading Meier would indicate a more harsh roster reset/rebuild that removes the cap crunch that Labanc's deal causes.In your opinion, is this mock trade I did, too little in return for Meier?
View attachment 572396