2022/23 Roster Thread XI: Konecny, So Hot Right Now, Konecny

Status
Not open for further replies.

Ghosts Beer

I saw Goody Fletcher with the Devil!
Feb 10, 2014
22,783
16,531
yea, but i think the main reason is the alumni and oldheads got pissed off and started showing thier displeasure. from the start hextall said it would take time. if this team wasnt so hard up for people who havent been relevant for 20 to 30 years hextall would of had time to see his plan to fruition. this being said, im not saying things would be much differant from now, who knows? but i would of liked to see what he would have done with another off season.
"Hextall was criticized for refusing to listen to scouts and advisers and had been accused of cutting off alumni access to the team. Hextall, a star goalie and one of the franchise's more popular players, had wanted his own process on his terms."

"He said Friday at a hotel across the street from the team's New Jersey headquarters that he was wrong to deny former players access to the locker room during an alumni game."


Face it, the guy was a micromanaging dictator and he pissed a ton of people off, from players to the front office. He had a mole behind the bench in Gord Murphy. He micromanaged his players' diets. He changed the long-time date of the Carnival. He isolated himself with Chris Pryor from the rest of the front office. And he wouldn't let alumni access the locker room *during an alumni game*. That's a little different than having a former trainer trying to cling on to his medical position.

You piss that many people off, and are in last place in the Eastern Conference in year 5 of your grand rebuild, then you get fired.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tucson83

Magua

Entirely Palatable Product
Apr 25, 2016
38,707
161,279
Huron of the Lakes
Atkinson was the only player they could get for Jake, who had negative value (which CBJ discovered after they signed JG).
Same contract amount, one extra year but lower cap hit.
In a post-COVID cap world, both players are basically unmovable.

And? I specifically mentioned term and term alone for what should be a rebuild. It’s a crap team regardless. I like my crap teams without long term commitments was my only point.
 

Beef Invictus

Revolutionary Positivity
Dec 21, 2009
130,561
171,400
Armored Train
Atkinson was the only player they could get for Jake, who had negative value (which CBJ discovered after they signed JG).
Same contract amount, one extra year but lower cap hit.
In a post-COVID cap world, both players are basically unmovable.

That's probably not true. Fletcher is just really bad at trades.
 

deadhead

Registered User
Feb 26, 2014
51,132
22,263
And? I specifically mentioned term and term alone for what should be a rebuild. It’s a crap team regardless. I like my crap teams without long term commitments was my only point.
Yeah, I think one of the things they have to do the next three years is move out these contracts.

Couts, if healthy, is the only veteran I want to keep long-term b/c of his "leadership by example" and hockey smarts that will allow him to have value for a young team.

JVR will be gone this spring (hopefully at the TDL), Braun is gone, Atkinson still has two years left.
Deslauriers I don't care, if they have to eat the $500K in a couple years for his last two seasons.
Risto, I think is moveable in the summer of 2024 with 3 years, eat a million or so, 3x4 with a rising cap will find a taker.
Laughton is not an issue, well worth his $3M and he also leads by example.

Ellis, looks like LTIR is his permanent home.

Since they have no contracts they need to give out the next couple years with Sanheim nailed down, they can eat money if need be to move out contracts. And I don't mind $4-5M in dead money b/c I don't think rebuilding teams should even consider free agents. By the time they're competitive, need to give some RFAs long-term deals, and might be thinking about FAs, that money should be off the books.

That's probably not true. Fletcher is just really bad at trades.
CBJ gave away Bjorkstrand b/c the cost of dumping Voracek's two years was higher than the ask for JVR.
 

Beef Invictus

Revolutionary Positivity
Dec 21, 2009
130,561
171,400
Armored Train
Yeah, I think one of the things they have to do the next three years is move out these contracts.

Couts, if healthy, is the only veteran I want to keep long-term b/c of his "leadership by example" and hockey smarts that will allow him to have value for a young team.

JVR will be gone this spring (hopefully at the TDL), Braun is gone, Atkinson still has two years left.
Deslauriers I don't care, if they have to eat the $500K in a couple years for his last two seasons.
Risto, I think is moveable in the summer of 2024 with 3 years, eat a million or so, 3x4 with a rising cap will find a taker.
Laughton is not an issue, well worth his $3M and he also leads by example.

Ellis, looks like LTIR is his permanent home.

Since they have no contracts they need to give out the next couple years with Sanheim nailed down, they can eat money if need be to move out contracts. And I don't mind $4-5M in dead money b/c I don't think rebuilding teams should even consider free agents. By the time they're competitive, need to give some RFAs long-term deals, and might be thinking about FAs, that money should be off the books.


CBJ gave away Bjorkstrand b/c the cost of dumping Voracek's two years was higher than the ask for JVR.

And Fletcher can't even take advantage of them.
 

Beef Invictus

Revolutionary Positivity
Dec 21, 2009
130,561
171,400
Armored Train
The Atkinson/Voracek trade is just another of the many lost trades in the Fletcher era.

The obsession with shooters and disregard for playmaking is insane. Voracek, Ghost, and Giroux all traded within 8 months and we got absolutely abused in each trade.

Yeah the idea that Atkinson is the only player Fletcher could extract us laughable. It's not a coincidence that Atkinson happens to be a higher end version of Fletcher's favorite player type.
 

Hextallent63

Registered User
Oct 13, 2011
3,250
3,386
"Hextall was criticized for refusing to listen to scouts and advisers and had been accused of cutting off alumni access to the team. Hextall, a star goalie and one of the franchise's more popular players, had wanted his own process on his terms."

"He said Friday at a hotel across the street from the team's New Jersey headquarters that he was wrong to deny former players access to the locker room during an alumni game."


Face it, the guy was a micromanaging dictator and he pissed a ton of people off, from players to the front office. He had a mole behind the bench in Gord Murphy. He micromanaged his players' diets. He changed the long-time date of the Carnival. He isolated himself with Chris Pryor from the rest of the front office. And he wouldn't let alumni access the locker room *during an alumni game*. That's a little different than having a former trainer trying to cling on to his medical position.

You piss that many people off, and are in last place in the Eastern Conference in year 5 of your grand rebuild, then you get fired.
fair enough. not going to argue anything you have said here and am aware and agree with most of it. i was just interested in what he had planned out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ghosts Beer

CanadianFlyer88

Knublin' PPs
Feb 12, 2004
44,177
53,812
Van City
Caught a clip of Torts saying he probably won't name a captain this year.

Immediately thought this probably isn't good news on the Couturier injury front, but then also thought Torts might not want Couts as captain anyway. :laugh:

Same clip had Torts saying Laughton was the only player deserving of a letter so far.

Torts is a weird dude.
 

deadhead

Registered User
Feb 26, 2014
51,132
22,263
Yeah the idea that Atkinson is the only player Fletcher could extract us laughable. It's not a coincidence that Atkinson happens to be a higher end version of Fletcher's favorite player type.
Find me another matching contract.
You weren't getting value for Voracek at 32 with $8.25M for 3 years. He would have cost more to dump than Ghost.
 
  • Like
Reactions: renberg

Striiker

Former Flyers Fan
Jun 2, 2013
90,306
157,003
Pennsylvania
What's hilarious is Fletchers so hopelessly incompetent that he thinks Voracek for 8.25m and Ghost for 4.5 are bad deals but Hayes for 7.1 or Risto for 5.1 are acceptable.

If he literally did nothing and made zero trades or FA signings since becoming GM, the team is significantly better than the one we have today.
 

deadhead

Registered User
Feb 26, 2014
51,132
22,263
What's hilarious is Fletchers so hopelessly incompetent that he thinks Voracek for 8.25m and Ghost for 4.5 are bad deals but Hayes for 7.1 or Risto for 5.1 are acceptable.

If he literally did nothing and made zero trades or FA signings since becoming GM, the team is significantly better than the one we have today.
No, it isn't.

G - Laughton - Voracek
JVR - Frost - TK
Lindblom - N Cates - Allison
Lycksell - J Cates - NAK

Provorov - Ghost
Sanheim - Gudas
Hagg - Myers

That's a pretty bad team.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Fight4yourRight

BrindamoursNose

Registered User
Oct 14, 2008
20,408
14,556
Atkinson was the only player they could get for Jake, who had negative value (which CBJ discovered after they signed JG).
Same contract amount, one extra year but lower cap hit.
In a post-COVID cap world, both players are basically unmovable.
That’s completely made up
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cody Webster

Beef Invictus

Revolutionary Positivity
Dec 21, 2009
130,561
171,400
Armored Train
Find me another matching contract.
You weren't getting value for Voracek at 32 with $8.25M for 3 years. He would have cost more to dump than Ghost.

He didn't actually need to be dumped though. Every part of Fletcher's process is broken and delusional.

Do you consider Atkinson negative value? Since Jake has negative value and all. Is trading for a loss in every move good management?
 

deadhead

Registered User
Feb 26, 2014
51,132
22,263
Atkinson is negative value, it's hard to move a 33 year old player on a 3 year deal.

The problem goes back to Hextall/Holmgren, rebuild in 2011, no problem, rebuild in 2015, well, by the time you're finished, G and Voracek are past their prime - but that means you should have considered moving them while they had value.

Sure enough, by 2020, the 2018-19 players couldn't carry the team anymore and the prospects who were supposed to arrive and pick up the slack . . .
 

Tripod

I hate this team
Aug 12, 2008
79,245
87,036
Nova Scotia
Atkinson is negative value, it's hard to move a 33 year old player on a 3 year deal.

The problem goes back to Hextall/Holmgren, rebuild in 2011, no problem, rebuild in 2015, well, by the time you're finished, G and Voracek are past their prime - but that means you should have considered moving them while they had value.

Sure enough, by 2020, the 2018-19 players couldn't carry the team anymore and the prospects who were supposed to arrive and pick up the slack . . .
You are re-writing the past.

It was WIDELY believed that the Flyers could becoming a top team in time for G's last 2 years of his contract. You thought it. I thought it. Appleyard thought it. Etc...

Or do you forget how many. Times you wrote "in 2 years...."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad