Speculation: 2022-23 Roster Thread Part II

Status
Not open for further replies.

DuckDuckGetz

Registered User
Nov 20, 2017
2,742
4,445
Little thought experiment I did today. With a couple of exceptions, these players would all be 4th liners/3rd pairing on a good team, right?

Megna
Jones
Carrick
Grant
Silfverberg
Comtois
Leason

Benoit
White
Beaulieu
Shattenkirk
 

ADHB

Registered User
Sponsor
Apr 9, 2012
4,097
4,922
Little thought experiment I did today. With a couple of exceptions, these players would all be 4th liners/3rd pairing on a good team, right?

Megna
Jones
Carrick
Grant
Silfverberg
Comtois
Leason

Benoit
White
Beaulieu
Shattenkirk
Of those you listed, I'd say only Jones, Grant, Silf,, and Shattenkirk would for sure be guys that play regularly on a good team... maybe Comtois depending on his motivation. And yes, those 4 would be 4th line, bottom pairing.
 

Smirnov2Chistov

Fire Greg Cronin!
Jan 21, 2011
5,651
4,340
Massachusetts
Little thought experiment I did today. With a couple of exceptions, these players would all be 4th liners/3rd pairing on a good team, right?

Megna
Jones
Carrick
Grant
Silfverberg
Comtois
Leason

Benoit
White
Beaulieu
Shattenkirk

The only bottom six players I would take on here is Jones, Carrick, Silf, Comtois and maybe Benoit. Everyone else is on the fringes of being AHL fodder.
 

dracom

Registered User
Dec 22, 2015
13,773
9,987
Vancouver, WA
Little thought experiment I did today. With a couple of exceptions, these players would all be 4th liners/3rd pairing on a good team, right?

Megna - Healthy scratch
Jones - 4th line
Carrick - 3rd/4th liner
Grant -3rd/4th line
Silfverberg - 4th line/healthy scratch
Comtois - 4th line/ healthy scratch
Leason - healthy scratch

Benoit - 3rd pair
White - 3rd pair/ healthy scratch
Beaulieu - healthy scratch
Shattenkirk - 3rd pair
 

duckpuck

Registered User
Sponsor
Jul 10, 2007
2,587
2,719
Little thought experiment I did today. With a couple of exceptions, these players would all be 4th liners/3rd pairing on a good team, right?

Megna - Healthy scratch
Jones - 4th line
Carrick - 3rd/4th liner
Grant -3rd/4th line
Silfverberg - 4th line/healthy scratch
Comtois - 4th line/ healthy scratch
Leason - healthy scratch

Benoit - 3rd pair
White - 3rd pair/ healthy scratch
Beaulieu - healthy scratch
Shattenkirk - 3rd pair

_______________________

That is incredibly generous to the forwards.

Megna is decent - he can play on a fourth line. I actually like him better than Jones FWIW.
Jones - I guess he's a fourth line player though he doesn't produce results. I'd like to see him traded.

Carrick is not an NHL 4th liner this year - he's seemingly not healthy. He is the only guy on the ducks to bring fighting/toughness, so I'd keep him.
Grant - at best, a 4th liner on any other team. Faceoff value.
Silf - sadly, no longer an NHL caliber player.
Leason - scratch


Agree with your defensive ratings generally, though Shat is barely a 5/6 at this point. On a good team, he's probably a scratch/7.
 

Ducks DVM

sowcufucakky
Jun 6, 2010
54,168
33,062
Long Beach, CA
Little thought experiment I did today. With a couple of exceptions, these players would all be 4th liners/3rd pairing on a good team, right?

Megna - Healthy scratch
Jones - 4th line
Carrick - 3rd/4th liner
Grant -3rd/4th line
Silfverberg - 4th line/healthy scratch
Comtois - 4th line/ healthy scratch
Leason - healthy scratch

Benoit - 3rd pair
White - 3rd pair/ healthy scratch
Beaulieu - healthy scratch
Shattenkirk - 3rd pair

_______________________

That is incredibly generous to the forwards.

Megna is decent - he can play on a fourth line. I actually like him better than Jones FWIW.
Jones - I guess he's a fourth line player though he doesn't produce results. I'd like to see him traded.

Carrick is not an NHL 4th liner this year - he's seemingly not healthy. He is the only guy on the ducks to bring fighting/toughness, so I'd keep him.
Grant - at best, a 4th liner on any other team. Faceoff value.
Silf - sadly, no longer an NHL caliber player.
Leason - scratch


Agree with your defensive ratings generally, though Shat is barely a 5/6 at this point. On a good team, he's probably a scratch/7.
This is how I see it as well. I’d put Comtois in as a 4th liner as well, as I don’t see his defensive play as good enough for the average 3rd line. Leason keeps showing potential to be a middle 6 players for 2-3 games, then disappearing. Hoping he’s just a typical larger framed guy who takes longer to figure his frame out.
 

TheGoodShepard1

Dongle Digits.
Nov 26, 2017
10,626
15,589
Is Benoit a 3rd pairing player anywhere else but Chicago and Columbus? He seems in over his head most of the time - especially lately.

I agree with the consensus though that we have 4-5 players that can’t hack it in this league

IMO, he's still a relatively good defender if you put him in well-defined tight areas in the corners and around the front of the net, but his foot speed is a major issue and is highlighted as a red flag on this team where the majority of defensemen are also poor skaters (hence why I thought he looked passable with Klingberg). It's also been exacerbated over the past few games because his partner is Shattenkirk, who has zero awareness of what's going on in his own end.

I would agree with the assessment that in a perfect world, he functions as your 7D in a Holzer-type role who can competently fill in for a few games if needed.
 

duckpuck

Registered User
Sponsor
Jul 10, 2007
2,587
2,719
IMO, he's still a relatively good defender if you put him in well-defined tight areas in the corners and around the front of the net, but his foot speed is a major issue and is highlighted as a red flag on this team where the majority of defensemen are also poor skaters (hence why I thought he looked passable with Klingberg). It's also been exacerbated over the past few games because his partner is Shattenkirk, who has zero awareness of what's going on in his own end.

I would agree with the assessment that in a perfect world, he functions as your 7D in a Holzer-type role who can competently fill in for a few games if needed.
I think Benoit is a guy with upside and could actually be a 4/5 with the right partner (which is not Shattenkirk). I view him as a maturing version of Manson (probably won't ever be that good).

Agree with you - put him with a better skating/passing partner and he'd be pretty solid. In any event, I want him on my bottom pair for his physicality.
 

DuckDuckGetz

Registered User
Nov 20, 2017
2,742
4,445
That is incredibly generous to the forwards.

Megna is decent - he can play on a fourth line. I actually like him better than Jones FWIW.
Jones - I guess he's a fourth line player though he doesn't produce results. I'd like to see him traded.

Carrick is not an NHL 4th liner this year - he's seemingly not healthy. He is the only guy on the ducks to bring fighting/toughness, so I'd keep him.
Grant - at best, a 4th liner on any other team. Faceoff value.
Silf - sadly, no longer an NHL caliber player.
Leason - scratch


Agree with your defensive ratings generally, though Shat is barely a 5/6 at this point. On a good team, he's probably a scratch/7.

Interestingly, I think that Grant is the best of all of them in that group. He was who I had in mind when I thought "with some exceptions," because I think he could play on the 3rd line even on a top team.

It's very frustrating to see an exciting play building and then realize that one of these guys are involved, because it reduces the chances of scoring by about 95%, especially Jones and Megna. They are practically allergic to scoring goals.
 

Hockey Duckie

Registered User
Jul 25, 2003
18,953
14,132
southern cal
Considering the team around him has gotten worse, this is a good sign...



Another way to see this is... the team constructed for this season is less talented than last season. The talented players are still producing at a high level like Z, Terry, Rico, McTavish, and Fowler. Drysdale missing the season doesn't help.
 

Mr Rogers

Registered User
Jul 11, 2010
20,923
10,531
Calgary
in DC for work this week, but don't think i'll get to the game. too much to see in this great city, supposed to be very warm tomorrow!
 

Goose of Reason

El Zilcho
May 1, 2013
9,732
9,466
Considering the team around him has gotten worse, this is a good sign...



I'm honestly surprised his defense only went up by 4 percent per those stats. I think a 20 is fair but last season he would have been closer to 0 for me. It was fun to watch him visibly have no idea what he was supposed to be doing in the defensive zone. Now he knows what to do he's just not good at it yet.
 

Leonardo87

New York Rangers, Anaheim Ducks, and TMNT fan.
Sponsor
Dec 8, 2013
40,992
64,811
New York
I'm honestly surprised his defense only went up by 4 percent per those stats. I think a 20 is fair but last season he would have been closer to 0 for me. It was fun to watch him visibly have no idea what he was supposed to be doing in the defensive zone. Now he knows what to do he's just not good at it yet.

Yeah this year the defense is so bad around him it’s really giving him a lot of credit to how he improved. I’ve seen it with the eye test. He is making more of those plays to get the puck out of danger but is still getting pinned. that’s more on the defense, imo.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad