895
Registered User
- Jun 15, 2007
- 8,612
- 7,699
How can anyone not watch the Leafs and not see us, circa, 2009-2017?
Have to root for them a little.
Have to root for them a little.
Last edited:
Sure, but it doesn’t hurt when the goalie you plugged in is 3-0 with a .976 save percentage and has let in two total goals in three games.I'm thinking the folks who were pronouncing the Devils dead might have spoken too soon
Sure…..but F no…..not rooting for them.How can anyone not watch the Leafs and see us, circa, 2009-2017?
Have to root for them a little.
Absolutely notHow can anyone not watch the Leafs and see us, circa, 2009-2017?
Have to root for them a little.
Because Caps fans are a niche group and not a big loud party of shitheads. I’d have to give this place some space if the Leafs ever actually did anythingHow can anyone not watch the Leafs and not see us, circa, 2009-2017?
Have to root for them a little.
How can anyone not watch the Leafs and not see us, circa, 2009-2017?
Have to root for them a little.
I think they need to be careful about pursuing Scheifele as a trade target. Winnipeg’s leadership group has apparently been rotten for years and Scheifele is a prominent member of that group.
Not saying they shouldn’t pursue him as he is definitely a top 6 talent and could maybe be had for cheap. But I hope they do their due-diligence if they do look at him so they can avoid some potential headaches down the road.
Sure, but it doesn’t hurt when the goalie you plugged in is 3-0 with a .976 save percentage and has let in two total goals in three games.
The Rangers are going through the reverse of last year; last year they were down 3-1 until the Pens had to use AHL goaltending and now the Rangers went up in the series when they played against a poor goalie before coming back to Earth running into a hot goalie.
Also, Vitek and Sammy are who we thought they were.
Dubois wants to go to Montreal doesn't he? UFA in 1 year, widely reported to want to go "home".Agree. Scheifele ain't the guy - something off about him. Dubois on the other hand is maybe worth a look. Torts seemed to have problems with him, but that can't be a dispositive issue - since he has problems with everybody not named Ryan Callahan.
Also, Vitek and Sammy are who we thought they were.
Why not both? Seems like both signed goalies also experienced some regression over the season and ended up less consistent than they were to begin with. Could it be the team and system too? Sure, but it's hard to pinpoint a goalie that Murray has helped.Is it possible Scott Murray wasn't/isn't the problem and VV and Swimmin Sammy are mediocre goalies who have fallibilities they weren't able to overcome? Some people are set in their ways (eg Sammy overplaying pucks) and can't be changed.
Name a goalie that has improved under Scott Murray?Is it possible Scott Murray wasn't/isn't the problem and VV and Swimmin Sammy are mediocre goalies who have fallibilities they weren't able to overcome? Some people are set in their ways (eg Sammy overplaying pucks) and can't be changed.
Possibly both, but look at the goalies he's been given in DC: VV, Sammy, Fucale, and Copley. At their current evaluations playing elsewhere: Meh.Why not both? Seems like both signed goalies also experienced some regression over the season and ended up less consistent than they were to begin with. Could it be the team and system too? Sure, but it's hard to pinpoint a goalie that Murray has helped.
Name a goalie that has improved under Scott Murray?
There isn't one.Possibly both, but look at the goalies he's been given in DC: VV, Sammy, Fucale, and Copley. At their current evaluations playing elsewhere: Meh.
Wonder what his rep was like with the Bears? Anyone want to do the homework? I'm day 4 with covid and uhhh, yeah, back to bed.
Richard Cranium Sirblocksalot.
You name one.
Murray took over in 2017-18. That was also the year that Braden Holtby took a nosedive into the Atlantic, and Mitch Korn had to be dragged out of semi-retirement to fix Holtby. Fortunately Korn did fix Holtby for that playoff run.Possibly both, but look at the goalies he's been given in DC: VV, Sammy, Fucale, and Copley. At their current evaluations playing elsewhere: Meh.
I think there's a handful of guys on Winnipeg's roster that intrigue me. Ehlers is preferred, but I'd take a serious look at Dubois and Scheifele as well. I presume Kyle Connor is the one player they would like to keep.A lot of reporters going in on the idea that Winnipeg should blow it up, which is an understandable position.
As mentioned earlier Ehlers is a guy Washington should target, though if Winnipeg is smart then they should only sell him for a premium while they promote him to the first line next year to really inflate his value. My understanding is Ehlers isn’t really part of the rotten core there, but rather seen as a secondary piece despite producing like a top end first liner for years.
The more I read the more I want no part of Scheifele.
Also, Pannarin has been invisible out there. 2 assists thru 5 games.They aren’t done yet but the Rangers really didn’t do much to improve their team with the Kane/Tarasenko additions.
I’ve always thought they were lacking…..VV in natural talent, Sammy between the ears…..this Scott Murray thing is hooey….or at least exaggerated.Is it possible Scott Murray wasn't/isn't the problem and VV and Swimmin Sammy are mediocre goalies who have fallibilities they weren't able to overcome? Some people are set in their ways (eg Sammy overplaying pucks) and can't be changed.
There isn't one.
Holtby got worse.
Vanecek was (slightly) better after moving.
Samsonov was better after moving.
Kuemper got worse since arriving here.
It's not even about making goalie elite. Not all goalies have potential to be that. But to me it's alarming that nobody improves here.
I wouldn't say no to Hellebuyck either, if the price is rightI think there's a handful of guys on Winnipeg's roster that intrigue me. Ehlers is preferred, but I'd take a serious look at Dubois and Scheifele as well. I presume Kyle Connor is the one player they would like to keep.
I know Scheifele has baggage, but the premise of a deal for him would have to involve sending Kuznetsov (and his baggage) in the other direction. Scheifele doesn't have to be part of the leadership core here. He doesn't need to wear a letter. This team has veteran leadership (in spades). It has Cup winners. It has Ovechkin, Oshie, and (for better or worse) Backstrom to hold the room together. Scheifele wouldn't have to be "the guy" here, he can be a secondary player who carries his line.