Avsboy
Registered User
- Dec 12, 2006
- 32,138
- 16,658
That may be your experience, but it isn't necessarily the same for everyone.Not so much lately. Lately, it's been more about "let me see how I can phrase this so I can only be minimally wrong but then take credit if I'm right." The application of this to the various hot takes has been the loose string that people have been pulling at lately. Like people are stupid.
Huh? I haven’t seen a single person here mention that we should blow it up?Bro we just won the Stanley Cup with one of the most talented and young cores in the league and people are talking about blowing it up and 21 year olds reaching the peak of their abilities...
Why would it not? You don't think roster decisions didn't take place based on what worked and didn't work? But what gets a little tiresome is the assumption of knowledge that doesn't exist. People aren't privy to everything. Another one: the pretense that one knows how a player will age. Yes, share your opinion. But are you saying the five pages of arguing and peacocking about something that's unknowable is necessary?I don't disagree with that but people are only discussing all options to address the cap crunch coming up soon like it is being done every offseason. That we just won a cup should have no bearing on that discussion which again happens every offseason. What are we supposed to talk about in here? How great it was to win the cup? There is a thread for that already.
They clearly did away with it before you joined Pierce.Whatever happened to HFs minimum age requirement?
They clearly did away with it before you joined Pierce.
Badum tsss
Yes, easily.Say we don't sign anyone else and we bank cap space until the deadline, can we use that "banked cap space" on a 2C and still have enough to pay bonuses at the end of the year?
It was the Meyers signing bonus that added $25k as it couldn't be applied to last season.Yes, bonus overages get tagged on the following year's cap. In fact, the Avs will be dealing with a small bonus overage ($25,000) for this upcoming season. Can't remember whose it was off the top of my head but they had been pretty careful to leave room for bonuses going into 2021, but injuries and the Meyers signing (I believe) ate away at that room.
Huh? I haven’t seen a single person here mention that we should blow it up?
Interesting.Yes, easily.
They clearly did away with it before you joined Pierce.
Badum tsss
Just as clarity... it wasn't a signing bonus, it was a games played bonus. Signing bonus was a separate 92.5k.Yes, easily.
It was the Meyers signing bonus that added $25k as it couldn't be applied to last season.
I think there is a plenty of good discussion to have about what the future holds. And whether we should push hard this season or just let things unfold as they may due to the seemingly likely cap crunch. There’s a lot of ways to go about that.Actually, I would LOVE to have an intelligent dialogue about blowing it up after 3 years.
1) As the associated prospect discussion makes abundantly clear: The Avs do not have much in terms of prospects.
2) The Avs will likely finish in the Top 5 for the next 2 or 3 years. So their #1 will be #27 or later.
This makes retooling a bit difficult. The team will basically be replacement level players in the entire bottom 6. It is difficult to trade such players for much in terms of prospects and picks.
I am not sure how valid all the scuttlebutt is about Makar wanting to eventually play in Calgary, but that is the stepping stone to blowing the whole thing up. Toews will have almost certainly left as a FA, and potentially Girard in a hockey trade. EJ long gone.
So there is a valid argument to be made ( not necessarily a winning argument, but.....) that rather than hitting the Mendoza Line level of performance after what is hopefully as many as 3 cups, one possible strategy is making Byram the new Makar and build a team around him. Trade Mac, Mikko, Nuke, Lehky, Makar for prospects and draft picks. Keep Landy around as the wise old man. Suck for 3 years, then start making noise again, but with an average age closer to 25 than 30. If SakMac gets really lucky, Meyers and Newhook could take on the 2C and 3C roles. If they get insanely lucky, Georgiev reaches his entire potential.
So before all the pontificating starts, I have posted this as a catalyst for a rational respectful dialogue. With all due respect to the core members of HFAvs, there are far too many ad hominem attacks during the off season ( OK, OK, 365 days per year.) None of us are qualified to take Sakic's place, and tend to put way way too much weight on our own flawed or uninformed suggestions. Geez. We all love the Avs. We all love talking about the team. So why not discuss a completely off the wall suggestion such as completely blowing up this team after 3 more seasons? If you think that this thought has never entered the minds of SakMac, you would be foolish.
So flame me if you wish, but I think that there could be a robust discussion on this topic, and pray that the discussion does not fall into the insult flow this forum has become lately.
Actually, I would LOVE to have an intelligent dialogue about blowing it up after 3 years.
1) As the associated prospect discussion makes abundantly clear: The Avs do not have much in terms of prospects.
2) The Avs will likely finish in the Top 5 for the next 2 or 3 years. So their #1 will be #27 or later.
This makes retooling a bit difficult. The team will basically be replacement level players in the entire bottom 6. It is difficult to trade such players for much in terms of prospects and picks.
I am not sure how valid all the scuttlebutt is about Makar wanting to eventually play in Calgary, but that is the stepping stone to blowing the whole thing up. Toews will have almost certainly left as a FA, and potentially Girard in a hockey trade. EJ long gone.
So there is a valid argument to be made ( not necessarily a winning argument, but.....) that rather than hitting the Mendoza Line level of performance after what is hopefully as many as 3 cups, one possible strategy is making Byram the new Makar and build a team around him. Trade Mac, Mikko, Nuke, Lehky, Makar for prospects and draft picks. Keep Landy around as the wise old man. Suck for 3 years, then start making noise again, but with an average age closer to 25 than 30. If SakMac gets really lucky, Meyers and Newhook could take on the 2C and 3C roles. If they get insanely lucky, Georgiev reaches his entire potential.
So before all the pontificating starts, I have posted this as a catalyst for a rational respectful dialogue. With all due respect to the core members of HFAvs, there are far too many ad hominem attacks during the off season ( OK, OK, 365 days per year.) None of us are qualified to take Sakic's place, and tend to put way way too much weight on our own flawed or uninformed suggestions. Geez. We all love the Avs. We all love talking about the team. So why not discuss a completely off the wall suggestion such as completely blowing up this team after 3 more seasons? If you think that this thought has never entered the minds of SakMac, you would be foolish.
So flame me if you wish, but I think that there could be a robust discussion on this topic, and pray that the discussion does not fall into the insult flow this forum has become lately.
Correct.Ah, but they can't bank cap space if they have to use LTIR correct? And I don't see a scenario where they don't dip into that for some portion of the season.
They tried like hell to bank cap space last year but that didn't last. I doubt it'll be any different this upcoming season. At some point someone major is going to miss time.Correct.
They tried like hell to bank cap space last year but that didn't last. I doubt it'll be any different this upcoming season. At some point someone major is going to miss time.
That's assuming they make no further signings and/or don't move any salary out. I feel like they're going to make at least one more move before the puck drops.Probably, but going into the season with ~3M in space for example would give them a lot of wiggle room.
That's enough space to bring 4 guys up for injury before having to put someone on LTIR.
IIRC they only started last season with like $1M in space or something. They would have a lot more wiggle room this season.
I'd also like a maximum age requirement as well.Whatever happened to HFs minimum age requirement?
Dubois?Is there any potential target for a 2C at the deadline? Must be a top 6 center playing on a shit team that won't re-up him.
Won't be easy to find.
IMO really depends how Winnipeg, Vancouver, Seattle, etc play. Some of the teams that have guys that could be moved, could start hot and not give up their guys.Is there any potential target for a 2C at the deadline? Must be a top 6 center playing on a shit team that won't re-up him.
Won't be easy to find.