Rumor: 2022-2023 Trade Rumors and Free Agency (Mod Warning in OP)

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
Byram will play more, as he should. he’s the better player. The finals was his coming out party and he’s only going to get better.

In theory, yes. But a caveat is the degree the Avs commit to load mgt. Bednar likes to try combinations anyway. But with various struggles staying healthy among the bottom 4, it’s a little less certain.
 
He will. At least at 5v5. G-Manson is our 2nd pairing. Byram is 3rd pair.

I would have agreed before the playoffs but now I'm pretty confident Byram is going to get more minutes. Somebody can double check it because I may have it wrong but I'm pretty sure Byram led both teams in 5vs5 minutes during the finals. Avs outshot the lighting by a huge margin when he was on the ice as well.

Unless he gets hurt or regresses it would be weird to lose that trust from the coach after proving yourself on the biggest stage possible. Bendar loves to shuffle the d-pairs. It wouldn't shock me to see Byram on the 3rd pair with EJ while Girard plays with Manson but I think you'll see Byram get shifts with Toews or Makar from time to time and get more minutes on PP/PK.
 
If G ends up not really playing any special teams, and Byram shows the concussion problems are behind him, then G should probably be moved at the deadline, that is too large a contract for a 5x5 only player.
 
If G ends up not really playing any special teams, and Byram shows the concussion problems are behind him, then G should probably be moved at the deadline, that is too large a contract for a 5x5 only player.
At the TDL there won't be the need to move money out to add plauers as there should be enough cap accrued, so if G is still on the team at the TDL it would be better to keep him and add to the team using non-roster pieces like the 2023 1st, Olausson, etc.
 
If G ends up not really playing any special teams, and Byram shows the concussion problems are behind him, then G should probably be moved at the deadline, that is too large a contract for a 5x5 only player.

Has there ever been a player in NHL history though whose concussion problems subsided completely and they never had problems again in the future? Honestly asking because I can't think of any examples........
 
Has there ever been a player in NHL history though whose concussion problems subsided completely and they never had problems again in the future? Honestly asking because I can't think of any examples........
Crosby has been fine for years after having concussion problems early in his career.
And Bergeron.
 
If Vancouver are extending Horvat does that make EP a possibility? What would that cost? Byram + something I’m assuming. Imagine getting him retained.
 
If Vancouver are extending Horvat does that make EP a possibility? What would that cost? Byram + something I’m assuming. Imagine getting him retained.
Highly unlikely they will even think about trading Petey. BB wants to run a Miller-EP-Horvat rotation heavily and they have the wings to support having three great centers. If Kuzmenko translates... they might have the deepest top 9 in the league. They have 8 forwards without Kuzmenko who could all pop over 20 goals up. Longer term... Petey and Miller can both shift over to wing if they need to condense.
 
Highly unlikely they will even think about trading Petey. BB wants to run a Miller-EP-Horvat rotation heavily and they have the wings to support having three great centers. If Kuzmenko translates... they might have the deepest top 9 in the league. They have 8 forwards without Kuzmenko who could all pop over 20 goals up. Longer term... Petey and Miller can both shift over to wing if they need to condense.
Where do they get the cap space from if they keep all three centers? They're projected to be $2.7 million over the cap with a 20 man roster according to Cap Friendly. They'd have to be looking at moving Boeser or Garland. Is Garland's 19 goals for almost $5 mill a year appealing to other teams?
 
Last edited:
Where do they get the cap space from if they keep all three centers? They're projected to be $2.7 million over the cap with a 20 man roster according to Cap Friendly .
By not spending 31m on defense. :laugh:

Ferland goes on IR to give them space this year. Next year they have 14.6m in space with Horvat as the big name to re-sign and it'll likely get tight... but following that year they start getting rid of the mid to higher dollar bad contracts.
 
By not spending 31m on defense. :laugh:

Ferland goes on IR to give them space this year. Next year they have 14.6m in space with Horvat as the big name to re-sign and it'll likely get tight... but following that year they start getting rid of the mid to higher dollar bad contracts.
31m on D? I see $24m this year and $21m next year with Hughes, Myers, and OEL taking up $21m. How are they going to reduce their D cap hit? OEL and Myers each have a form of no move clause and I doubt they moves Hughes.
 
31m on D? I see $24m this year and $21m next year with Hughes, Myers, and OEL taking up $21m. How are they going to reduce their D cap hit? OEL and Myers each have a form of no move clause and I doubt they moves Hughes.
I'm making a joke on the 31m. Avs spend over 31m on defense and that is the reason the Avs can't afford centers like Vancouver. When people say 'how can they afford that?' it is pretty simple... they are dedicating more space to the center position than elsewhere on the roster.

Myers won't be re-signed. That'll drop the hit going into 2024, but they'll likely need to replace Myers with a better defensemen for a similar salary longer term.
 
I'm making a joke on the 31m. Avs spend over 31m on defense and that is the reason the Avs can't afford centers like Vancouver. When people say 'how can they afford that?' it is pretty simple... they are dedicating more space to the center position than elsewhere on the roster.

Myers won't be re-signed. That'll drop the hit going into 2024, but they'll likely need to replace Myers with a better defensemen for a similar salary longer term.
OK, fair enough on the $31m joke. Next year will be tough to the Canucks if they extend Horvat. After that it does open up a bit but they are still relatively tight against the cap. Perhaps they are banking on the cap going up.
 
OK, fair enough on the $31m joke. Next year will be tough to the Canucks if they extend Horvat. After that it does open up a bit but they are still relatively tight against the cap. Perhaps they are banking on the cap going up.
With the 14.6m... say Horvat is 7.5m. That leave 7.1m to re-sign Kuzmenko, Dermott, and Hoglander plus another guy or two brought up or signed to ~1m deals. Dermott is pretty likely to fall in the low 2s. The other two are wild cards with how they perform this year. Could be in the 1s and could be in the 4s, neither would surprise me. If they end up on the higher end, it'll accelerate their getting rid of Dickinson and maybe Pearson. If both of those guys perform really well though, they'll likely move Boeser for a futures package.
 
With the 14.6m... say Horvat is 7.5m. That leave 7.1m to re-sign Kuzmenko, Dermott, and Hoglander plus another guy or two brought up or signed to ~1m deals. Dermott is pretty likely to fall in the low 2s. The other two are wild cards with how they perform this year. Could be in the 1s and could be in the 4s, neither would surprise me. If they end up on the higher end, it'll accelerate their getting rid of Dickinson and maybe Pearson. If both of those guys perform really well though, they'll likely move Boeser for a futures package.

The issue is going to be the defense. They’ll have two defensemen signed when Myers contract expires. Myers/OEL kinda kill that defense by themselves until Myers expires.

I don’t think there screwed from a cap stand point but it’s not a great spot to be in IMO given they aren’t a legitimate contender. You’d want some more wiggle room to add ideally for a team like that.
 
The issue is going to be the defense. They’ll have two defensemen signed when Myers contract expires. Myers/OEL kinda kill that defense by themselves until Myers expires.

I don’t think there screwed from a cap stand point but it’s not a great spot to be in IMO given they aren’t a legitimate contender. You’d want some more wiggle room to add ideally for a team like that.
I agree, they can stay under the cap, well actually they'll have no choice, but how to do it with the Miller-EP-Horvat rotation along with OEL/Hughes/Myers in 23-24 and still ice a decent team.

The other 3 to 4 D men are going to likely have to be sketchy at best to stay under the cap.
 
The issue is going to be the defense. They’ll have two defensemen signed when Myers contract expires. Myers/OEL kinda kill that defense by themselves until Myers expires.

I don’t think there screwed from a cap stand point but it’s not a great spot to be in IMO given they aren’t a legitimate contender. You’d want some more wiggle room to add ideally for a team like that.
*3 defensemen... Poolman. Though that might be generous for his play. :laugh:

They will likely have Dermott locked up soon. Their future on defense is a bit murky, but they have a guy I REALLY like in Rathbone, but he has to transition. My bet is they will send Boeser packing for a young RD and picks to solve that issue in their lineup.
 
*3 defensemen... Poolman. Though that might be generous for his play. :laugh:

They will likely have Dermott locked up soon. Their future on defense is a bit murky, but they have a guy I REALLY like in Rathbone, but he has to transition. My bet is they will send Boeser packing for a young RD and picks to solve that issue in their lineup.

I was going to include Rathbone but have PTSD as an Avs fan penciling in prospects. Certainly easier to do for other teams.

I guess my thing with Vancouver is for me where they are at and what the roster looks like now and going forward I'd be alot happier if I had more wiggle room with the cap. It's manageable. I think it is for most teams because it's possible to make moves and tweak things but I don't think it's a good situation to be in for a team like that.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad