LOFIN
Registered User
- Sep 16, 2011
- 16,700
- 23,658
Why would there be?Is there rumors of EJ retiring?
Why would there be?Is there rumors of EJ retiring?
Not if that’s an indication of future performance. Again, Avs had good reason to move on from him.Unless you're talking elite/higher end goalies, these guys yoyo a lot. So buying low after a down year can be smart.
I’ve been saying this all along about Gibson but people believe what they want. Sakic doesn’t seem to want to pay over 5 Million for a starter so our options are even more limited.I don’t understand everyone’s infatuation with Gibson. He used to be good. He’s been living off the rep ever since. A Gibson trade looks worse than last year’s Kuemper trade and we would also get worse results. Just seems like Jose Theodore all over again. I’d much rather roll the dice with Kuemper at the cost of no assets *assuming the price is reasonable.*
Overall, It’s difficult to armchair GM this off-season. Everyone is a cup winner now. Opposing GM’s pay a premium for that regardless of whether it means anything. There will be some guys looking to cash in. There will be others that want another crack at the cup with this group and are willing to take a bit less to do so. We can’t afford bidding wars, so only the 2nd group is a reasonable option to pull from. Not entirely sure who those guys will be.
People need to remember not to implode when the final roster is set. It won’t be as good as our cup winning roster but it also won’t be the roster we enter the 2023 playoffs with. We added so many important pieces during the season last year and will do it again as the cap permits.
I think he's probably more of a LW now then a C. I'm pretty sure that's mostly what he was playing in Winnipeg last season although he's still really good at taking faceoffs.Really, based on what you’ve seen from the Avs- what makes you think they have any interest in signing Stastny now especially given his production. I mean I get your argument based on need for a 3C and Stastny’s production but we already have JTC and we were already complaining about his salary and how a million bucks here or there would make a huge difference. So I neither see the interest on the Avs’ part or a pressing need IMO to bring Stastny back. Maybe the Avs decide this part of their contention window requires signing aged vets like Stastny, Malkin and Giroux. I just think it’s unwise and there will be better choices. It seems premature to me to be signing cup chasing vets but Sakic did at least inquire about Giroux. So you might be right. However, I don’t think Sakic ever made a similar inquiry with Stastny.
It would be hilarious as all hell, but I think Kadri is the type of guy who would not sign for Boston or Ottawa. Like I've said, I still think he wants to play for the Leafs at some point but that's going to have to wait until the management changes.If Kadri signs with Boston, Steve Dangle will die!
If it's 10 million you say thanks for your contributions and we'll contact you once your Stanley Cup ring is ready.10 million for Kadri? Good for him, awful for literally any team that signs that.
I don’t care bout the sentimental part you mentioned but it’s not a horrible idea. It may not work. He’s 37 and may not be able to exert the effort like the younger guys. Or he might thrive with more open ice and his playmaking ability.I think he's probably more of a LW now then a C. I'm pretty sure that's mostly what he was playing in Winnipeg last season although he's still really good at taking faceoffs.
To be honest, I never really thought it much further than that. I could just see him being a good add as a 3rd line player with his experience and playmaking ability for the 2nd PP unit. It's always nice to have another strong faceoff guy as well.
I was thinking it could be his last NHL contract (1 year) before he calls it quits and would be 'nice' if he finished his career where it started. As far as 'fit' within Bednar's system, it may not work, I'll give you that and I have no earthly idea if he would be the type of player that would be on their radar or not... probably not.
I wasn't mentioning what I think "the Avs are going to do", I specifically said "I would take Stastny back on a 1 year - $2M deal". I just think it would be cool if it happened as a fan of the team and the player. That's all.
I don’t understand everyone’s infatuation with Gibson. He used to be good. He’s been living off the rep ever since. A Gibson trade looks worse than last year’s Kuemper trade and we would also get worse results. Just seems like Jose Theodore all over again. I’d much rather roll the dice with Kuemper at the cost of no assets *assuming the price is reasonable.*
Overall, It’s difficult to armchair GM this off-season. Everyone is a cup winner now. Opposing GM’s pay a premium for that regardless of whether it means anything. There will be some guys looking to cash in. There will be others that want another crack at the cup with this group and are willing to take a bit less to do so. We can’t afford bidding wars, so only the 2nd group is a reasonable option to pull from. Not entirely sure who those guys will be.
People need to remember not to implode when the final roster is set. It won’t be as good as our cup winning roster but it also won’t be the roster we enter the 2023 playoffs with. We added so many important pieces during the season last year and will do it again as the cap permits.
Record | GAA | SV% | SO | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Oct-Jan | 15-10-8 | 2.49 | .922 | 1 |
Feb-Apr | 3-16-3 | 4.32 | .876 | 0 |
I don’t share that nostalgia so that’s why it’s a non-factor for me but I understand where you’re coming from. Sorry. I could care less about how Stastny ends his career (no disrespect to you intended). The only dudes I care about in that regard are EJ and Landeskog because they wanted to be here and Calvert who is also deserving.I think he's probably more of a LW now then a C. I'm pretty sure that's mostly what he was playing in Winnipeg last season although he's still really good at taking faceoffs.
To be honest, I never really thought it much further than that. I could just see him being a good add as a 3rd line player with his experience and playmaking ability for the 2nd PP unit. It's always nice to have another strong faceoff guy as well.
I was thinking it could be his last NHL contract (1 year) before he calls it quits and would be 'nice' if he finished his career where it started. As far as 'fit' within Bednar's system, it may not work, I'll give you that and I have no earthly idea if he would be the type of player that would be on their radar or not... probably not.
I wasn't mentioning what I think "the Avs are going to do", I specifically said "I would take Stastny back on a 1 year - $2M deal". I just think it would be cool if it happened as a fan of the team and the player. That's all.
The only UFA that really matters is Nichuskin. Losing him would be really, really tough to replace, and unless you get Forsberg somehow any alternatives would be significantly worse.The situation seems a little grim. Trying to keep the band together can be tough but let’s not forget that TB had cap issues and they managed to ice a good team three years in a row.
yeah Nuke is #1 priority. I’ve expected to lose Kadri and Bura. Manson ended up being the perfect #4 D. I think he would be great next to Girard or Byram but it depends on what he is asking for. Kuemper I could go either way but I don’t want to be left scrambling. Joe/Chris need to make that decision early and not be left waiting and then a last minute scramble again. Ideally I would like to upgrade Kuemper but I don’t see many good options available.The only UFA that really matters is Nichuskin. Losing him would be really, really tough to replace, and unless you get Forsberg somehow any alternatives would be significantly worse.
Losing Kadri has always been inevitable, and it doesn't make sense to sign him at his age.
Kuemper and Manson are 50/50 but their losses wouldn't be a huge issue given that their contracts would probably not be great at their ages. Sakic will find a decent goalie somehow, as he did with Grubauer and Kuemper.
Burakovsky would be a loss but he can be replaced internally (eg. Newhook or Olausson) or with a shrewd trade or UFA signing.
Tampa has been great at finding talent with late picks, the Avs are completely lost after the 1st round. That is the massive difference between these two teams.The situation seems a little grim. Trying to keep the band together can be tough but let’s not forget that TB had cap issues and they managed to ice a good team three years in a row.
Didn't even realize Byram can be extended now as well. Would be good if that could be settled, but I'm sceptical. I guess if he wants to be safe considering his concussion issues, but if he's healthy he's going to get much more value in his contract after a full breakout season.Extend Mack, extend Val, and hopefully extend Byram. Keep the core together and work around that.
Giroux at 2C would be a great replacement for Kadri.
You would think teams would see the issues brought on in Minnesota by making large gambles but…this is the NHL, every GM is a player away from being a player away.Yeah, the last couple of summers have been more tamed then usual though thanks to Covid and the cap strap as well as money strap of a lot of teams.
But it looks like hockey is back baby! And GMs are back to being 90% idiots while the other 10% are the ones who end up winning cups. Fortunately Sakic falls in that other 10%.
I guess the idea that by the 24/25 season the Cap could see a significant rise is contributing to teams getting trigger happy early.
Madness
GMs probably figure they won’t be around to deal with the consequences and they’re probably right.You would think teams would see the issues brought on in Minnesota by making large gambles but…this is the NHL, every GM is a player away from being a player away.