Alienblood
Registered User
- Nov 22, 2021
- 5,116
- 2,821
I don’t follow other teams to closely I thought I had read it on HF.Bear? I didn't read that anywhere. In fact Friedman mentioned on his pod that Bear and his camp can't be happy that he was kept out of the playoffs.
Now that the two best centers in the league (McDavid, Matthews) on teams with bad defenses and no 1D, were eliminated in the first round, and swept in the conference finals, that should officially prove to everyone that 1D's and defense in general are more important than 1C's.
Defense wins. It's the great equalizer. You can't go anywhere in the NHL without it. 1D > 1C
I mean everything matters. I think 1C's are the most important position but if you wanna win a cup you kinda need everything. Exceptions of course like the Penguins that one year but some years one is more valuable than the other.
Great teams win. I think in all these conversations wingers get insanely underrated as well. They are nowhere near as valuable as a 1C/1D but alot of these cup teams would lose without them. Justin Williams, Dustin Brown, Marian Gaborik, Patrick Sharp, Phil Kessell, Marian Hossa, Kucherov etc. People re-write history abit IMO because in alot of cup runs those guys were as valuable as anybody.
1C is the most important position IMO but the gap is nowhere near as big as some act and you can absolutely overcome it with incredible defense.
1D is the most important for meI mean everything matters. I think 1C's are the most important position but if you wanna win a cup you kinda need everything. Exceptions of course like the Penguins that one year but some years one is more valuable than the other.
Great teams win. I think in all these conversations wingers get insanely underrated as well. They are nowhere near as valuable as a 1C/1D but alot of these cup teams would lose without them. Justin Williams, Dustin Brown, Marian Gaborik, Patrick Sharp, Phil Kessell, Marian Hossa, Kucherov etc. People re-write history abit IMO because in alot of cup runs those guys were as valuable as anybody.
1C is the most important position IMO but the gap is nowhere near as big as some act and you can absolutely overcome it with incredible defense.
Nice having him as an RFA.Sooo the price of Lehkonen is going up. If we trade him, we better at least receive 9 first-rounders, because otherwise, MacK is going to be very upset.
Counterpoint: you can't do sh¡t if you don't have bothNow that the two best centers in the league (McDavid, Matthews) on teams with bad defenses and no 1D, were eliminated in the first round, and swept in the conference finals, that should officially prove to everyone that 1D's and defense in general are more important than 1C's.
Defense wins. It's the great equalizer. You can't go anywhere in the NHL without it. 1D > 1C
Yet, Toronto pushed Tampa to 7 games having Campbell in net.I just don't see how 1C can be the most important position the way the seasons ended for Matthews and McDavid. They're the best centers in the NHL and they lost because their teams had bad defenses and no 1D.
Yet, Toronto pushed Tampa to 7 games having Campbell in net.
Also, didn't Nashville used to have like 2 or 3 #1 D and couldn't win it all?
Great goaltender is the most vital part imo.1D is the most important for me
Good and bad because someone might offer sheet himNice having him as an RFA.
True, too much of anything isn't good if it leaves cracks other parts of the roster.When Nashville’s D was truly stacked they had almost no offense. Suter also left as soon as he could.
MacK does not like 1st round draft picks, because he does not play with them.Sooo the price of Lehkonen is going up. If we trade him, we better at least receive 9 first-rounders, because otherwise, MacK is going to be very upset.
When Nashville’s D was truly stacked they had almost no offense. Suter also left as soon as he could.
I don't think you can win with just one or the other. You can win with a good 1C and a 1D, or if you have a truly elite 1C or 1D you can get away with a more mid tier combo on the other end.So, they could have used an elite #1C at the time, right?
After these playoffs I definitely believe Compher is tradable if we want to, without retention either. Than Myers can take his spot as the 3 or 4 C and we save some money there and put it towards Nuke and Lehk.
Definitely.Compher is tradeable alright, but with his clutch performances and rare solid RHS, maybe he should be kept?
Compher is tradeable alright, but with his clutch performances and rare solid RHS, maybe he should be kept?
A #1 C is like a QB. It helps elevate the franchise but if the overall roster is not deep, you won't win much in the playoffs. a #1 D is like a pass rusher, it makes things easier.Now that the two best centers in the league (McDavid, Matthews) on teams with bad defenses and no 1D, were eliminated in the first round, and swept in the conference finals, that should officially prove to everyone that 1D's and defense in general are more important than 1C's.
Defense wins. It's the great equalizer. You can't go anywhere in the NHL without it. 1D > 1C
The SC POs is a war of attrition and exposes a team’s deficiencies whether that be G, D corps, top 6, bottom 6, physicality and depth. Remember the Avs ousted a WCF finalist while missing a starting G, D-man and F. Most impressively, the Avs have repeatedly shown comeback ability.A #1 C is like a QB. It helps elevate the franchise but if the overall roster is not deep, you won't win much in the playoffs. a #1 D is like a pass rusher, it makes things easier.
You need both to win. Your roster has to have balance and depth to win.