How can you say this in the midst of the conversation where the topic is entirely about Slaf getting clobbered on the ice every few games?
I did say in the post you're replying to that if that trend continues I would probably want him sent to the AHL. I don't think 3 or 4 big hits in 20 games is enough that I would currently call it a glaring flaw that is preventing him from learning at the NHL level, but we'll see what happens. The reason I say it is because he is visibly playing an assertive game and using his skills and physical tools to make plays, take risks, and is progressing quickly. If he keeps getting himself into trouble then I'm fine with sending him down to learn to map small ice in a slower league but his overall play doesn't suggest he's being rushed to me.
For me it's as simple as he's performing well in an NHL role currently and is visibly developing at this level. Even just at the most basic raw points only view he's on pace for around 25-30 points which is basically the peak of what a player can feasibly do averaging 11 minutes of TOI on the fourth line. The next test will be if he can continue progression into a top six or middle-six role with more TOI and better matchups, and if he can protect himself better on the ice. Once again we'll see what happens, and hopefully Monahan is healthy as it'll be harder to evaluate if he's playing ~14 minutes but with Evans and Dadonov or something.
He has a ton of flaws and issues and only someone purposefully ignoring them would say otherwise. He is behind at some point of every play. He receives a big hit every few games that knocks him on his ass and can injure him. How is that not a technical flaw in your opinion?
I think this is a bit dramatic. By this standard, we only have four or five NHL forwards, and everyone else should be in the AHL. I'm not one of those who think he's been an amazing top 6 stud already and just needs more ice time, I just think he's been an overall solid bottom six NHL forward thus far, flaws and all. He has a lot of flaws off the puck, but he also has a lot of tools (esp boardplay) that other players lack and so far the positive is outweighing the negative, and there's been visible progression in his play.
What I mean by a technical flaw in this context is a single tool that is so far below NHL calibre it forces a player to adopt a hugely oversimplified game and abandon anything creative. Eg. when Mete was 19 and weighed 140 pounds so he couldn't engage physically whatsoever and had to throw the puck away and play an extremely risk-averse style.
Slafkovsky has tons of flaws in his game currently but they aren't preventing him from being assertive with the puck or playing creatively, and he is physically able to handle NHL play. Again if he keeps getting caught with his head down then I would say we're reaching a point where he should be sent to the AHL to figure out how to map the ice better, but otherwise, I don't see a player that's restricting his game and not developing just to stay afloat in the NHL the way rookie Mete was.