DangleCity
Registered User
- Jun 23, 2016
- 7,195
- 3,390
Two games in, but I expect the run defense and red zone offense to be issues at times this season.
Certainly can say he's been conservative at times in the red zones, but I think that's due to a number of factors and will most likely get better as the season goes on. They have a QB 2 games into his career, who most likely is nowhere near to having the full playbook at his disposal. They also are most likely taking the long approach with this kid, they aren't going to be running high risk stuff, especially down in the Red zone where the field is compressed and everything is harder. Lastly, this team can win on defense and FGs (I know that isn't what alot of people want to hear), they aren't going to risk pts and the kids confidence. It's still a marathonthey paid for 2 TE and haven’t given them a single target in the red zone. I blame Josh.
Can't ruin his confidence if you don't ever give him the chance.Certainly can say he's been conservative at times in the red zones, but I think that's due to a number of factors and will most likely get better as the season goes on. They have a QB 2 games into his career, who most likely is nowhere near to having the full playbook at his disposal. They also are most likely taking the long approach with this kid, they aren't going to be running high risk stuff, especially down in the Red zone where the field is compressed and everything is harder. Lastly, this team can win on defense and FGs (I know that isn't what alot of people want to hear), they aren't going to risk pts and the kids confidence. It's still a marathon
Isn't the whole point not to ruin his confidence? At the end of the day they can still win games and bring the kid along. They should be 2-0 with 2 division wins despite the faults people see in the playcallingCan't ruin his confidence if you don't ever give him the chance.
The script is too easy for defenses..get inside the RZ, run run run, FG.
Certainly can say he's been conservative at times in the red zones, but I think that's due to a number of factors and will most likely get better as the season goes on. They have a QB 2 games into his career, who most likely is nowhere near to having the full playbook at his disposal. They also are most likely taking the long approach with this kid, they aren't going to be running high risk stuff, especially down in the Red zone where the field is compressed and everything is harder. Lastly, this team can win on defense and FGs (I know that isn't what alot of people want to hear), they aren't going to risk pts and the kids confidence. It's still a marathon
I mean the line is part of the reason. But outside a few exception years, the Patriots have never really been a big downfield offense. They take a shot from time to time, but its far from their calling card on offense.I think the o-line is primarily why they don’t attack downfield and I’m fine with that but I’d like to see Henry or Jonnu split out wide in the RZ for a fade or box out slant depending on the coverage. Mac has great touch so I think he’s going to be pretty good throwing fades
Also I do expect N’Keal to impact the team a little bit in the red zone, for all the things he does terribly he does use his frame to seal people off and make contested catches
Just a terrible look for the Jets yesterday with Wilson sucking and Darnold looking more than competent againMazz: The biggest difference between Mac Jones and Zach Wilson – and why we shouldn’t forget it Mazz: The biggest difference between Mac Jones and Zach Wilson - and why we shouldn't forget it
Losing Trent Brown has really thrown everything out of wack. The line should be a strengthVery simple
the OL is dictating how Jones plays
he’s got major balls but he’s got below average time
I love Jones because he
1. Is accurate
2. Makes great decisions
3. Is humble but confident
4. Has stones
5. He controls pocket
you stay in the pocket you are more protected then young Harry Potter living at Privet drive
you stay in pocket
The D can’t hit you
High
Low
Late
Hard
Jimmy G got hurt twice
1. outside pocket running vs Dolphins crushed by Alonzo
2. outside pocket vs Chiefs
I go back to Babe Parilli with Pats and Johnny Unitas with Colts, Bart Starr with Packers and Roger Staubach with Cowboys
Jones is a killer - he just needs average to good protection
you know who knows this ?
Brady
I think we’re witnessing the recalibration of a fanbase.
There are fans that just want to see Jones get better week to week, and have a competitive team with a compelling product to invest in. Build for the future.
Then there are fans who believe that, because they still have Belichick on the sidelines, and because of how much they invested in the roster during free agency, this team should be right back there, competing for the division and making a legit run for the AFC Championship game.
Are these realistic expectations?
You tell me.
There’s also a sliver of the fanbase that wants to see the organization fall flat on its face due to how things ended with Brady. They’ll spite watch the Patriots, hoping for them to fail.
I get the sense that this may have been more the case with Newton under center last season. I think a lot of these people are still rooting for Brady and Tampa to win while also hoping that the Pats have found their future in Mac and want to see him develop.
There are red flags with this team based on the first two weeks, but there were red flags in previous seasons and they typically figured things out. We’ll have a better sense of what this team is once they’ve played Buffalo and some of the other good to very good teams on their schedule.
Hard to put a number on how many wins = a successful season right now.
Very simple
the OL is dictating how Jones plays
he’s got major balls but he’s got below average time
I love Jones because he
1. Is accurate
2. Makes great decisions
3. Is humble but confident
4. Has stones
5. He controls pocket
you stay in the pocket you are more protected then young Harry Potter living at Privet drive
It really hinges on what your expectations are for this season.Agree with all of this. What worries me about the red flags though is that in the past the greatest quarterback of all time was around to cover up a lot of issues.
Asking a rookie QB to do that is a recipe for failure. And considering how much they tried to improve the roster this past off-season, they're clearly trying to be competitive right now. I think it makes it fair to criticize this approach without blaming Mac Jones for developmental growing pains literally every young QB experiences.
He certainly covered up things especially in the 2nd half of the dynasty, but its sort of the whole point of having the GOAT. You can skimp in some areas so you can sure up other parts.Agreed.
Brady covered a lot of warts over the years.
It wasn’t always enough to win a title, but sometimes it turned what should have been 8-8 into 11-5 and gave them a shot to make some noise.
Wait ? I saw all movies read all the books and I don’t remember thisAmazing.
So does that make Belichick Aunt Petunia?
Super grouchy all the time, but at the end of the story it’s revealed why?
Agreed.
Brady covered a lot of warts over the years.
It wasn’t always enough to win a title, but sometimes it turned what should have been 8-8 into 11-5 and gave them a shot to make some noise.
Agree with all of this. What worries me about the red flags though is that in the past the greatest quarterback of all time was around to cover up a lot of issues.
Asking a rookie QB to do that is a recipe for failure. And considering how much they tried to improve the roster this past off-season, they're clearly trying to be competitive right now. I think it makes it fair to criticize this approach without blaming Mac Jones for developmental growing pains literally every young QB experiences.
Wait ? I saw all movies read all the books and I don’t remember this
Who drafted and developed Tom?Without the greatest QB/player in NFL history, Belichick is really Cleveland Bill. Complete with a losing record, and it's not even close. Saying he's the greatest NFL coach of all time is on par with saying Phil Jackson is the greatest NBA coach of all time.
Did they need more weapons against Philly? How about in the Giants SB?This is what irks me and what makes me dislike BB more and more as the GM. He had the guy to cover up the warts, why didn't you give him more weapons offensively and win more titles? Seems like a no brainer to me.
Did they need more weapons against Philly? How about in the Giants SB?
They won 6 in 18 years, which is unheard of. You make it sound like it was so simple. Outside of 2006, when did he not have enough weapons?
In what sort of deluded world did they need more offensive weapons in 2007? They had the most prolific offense in history to that point. Not everything bad that happens to this team is Bills faultThey lost those games, so yes. And there were plenty of years where they had clown shoes for WRs, whether you want to admit it or not.