WJC: 2021 Canada Roster Talk Part 3

  • Xenforo Cloud will be upgrading us to version 2.3.5 on March 3rd at 12 AM GMT. This version has increased stability and fixes several bugs. We expect downtime for the duration of the update. The admin team will continue to work on existing issues, templates and upgrade all necessary available addons to minimize impact of this new version. Click Here for Updates
Two guys came to play, the rest looked like they were at 80%. Byram seemed to be the only one capable of creating offense.
 
He never moved up higher than the 3rd line for a couple shifts. Planted as 4th liner and 13th fwd. Did he piss the coach off during camp?

His usage was strange to me. I get trying to get your skill players going, but when it's a short tournament and your skill players aren't doing much of anything, mix it up a bit. The kid battles hard and finds a way to get the puck. That would have been extremely beneficial on the top-6.

I do think a lot of what happened yesterday was a result of the Canadian forwards really having their weaknesses masked by a stronger defensive unit. From a tournament perspective, the only consistent offensive threat was Cozens, and he had his worst game of the tournament. McMichael was snakebit and was forcing shots into shinpads any chance he had. Byfield had one big game, and was mostly invisible after that. Quinn was atrocious, took so long to make decisions that the other team often made the decision for him. Newhook wasn't assertive enough, and then got banged up on top of that. Perfetti showed that he has skills, but his skating wasn't able to keep up with the play frequently enough that it reduced his impact. You could go on, and on with the Canadian forwards. It doesn't help that once the American's started pressuring more the forwards just stood still and stopped fighting back.

At the end of the day though, this was a group of teenagers that haven't played in 8+ months. The easy road to the finals did them no favours, as there was no need to bite down on the mouth guard and just go for it. Hopefully these guys learn some lessons from the loss, and they use that to propel themselves towards future success.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Anichels
Was about to be the most overrated junior team yet, none of the guys were gamebreakers like we've seen in past years. Our hockey program is full of entitled teens hanging on to past tournament performances. Get some kids with heart next year please.
What an absolute travesty of a post. This post reeks of entitlement, just an absurd take on a team that had one off game the whole tournament.
 
Calling this team the best ever is laughable, which admittedly most people doubted. But calling it some super deep team wasn't accurate either which a lot more people said it was.

Good:
--------
Cozens
McMichael

Solid
-------
Holloway
Krebs
Pelletier
Tomasino
Mercer
Newhook

Weak
-------
Perfetti
Byfield
Zary
Suzuki
Quinn

Pretty much an average team Canada up front, maybe one more skill guy than usual. But most of the skill guys didn't do much.

If you take away the Swiss and German joke games I think Canada had 10 goals with goalies in the net in 5 games. Weak offence.
Almost every player on that list IS a skill guy. They are FAR more talented than the US team. That doesn't necessarily translate to victory. Blue Jackets beat Tampa with virtually no talent at all.
 
In general terms I'm not sure I like the style of Canadian hockey over the last so many U20s. Maybe I'm wrong, maybe hockey has changed so quickly however I miss the physical part of the game that we used to play. I miss power hockey, taking the puck to the net etc. Too much fancy passing, too many toe drags and being cute.

I'd agree with you. I don't think you need to bring a group of grinders to the tournament, but you need a nice mix. This years team just didn't have enough guys that were able to simplify their games and go to the dirty areas. It's always a bad sign when your team is behind, and you are trying no look drop passes, or every second pass attempt is just flinging the puck across the rink expecting to hit someone in full flight.

Part of it is on the coaching staff as well. The guys that were getting in the dirty areas (Zary and Mercer for example), also never got moved up.
 
  • Like
Reactions: robsenz
The credit should go to team USA for executing a solid game plan and sticking to it. They pressured Canada hard until they got the lead, then sat back and kept everything to the outside. If Canada got the first goal of the game it would have changed how USA was playing.
 
The US were battle-tested, and Canada breezed to the gold medal game. It doesn't matter how much talent you have, in tight games its about effort and fight, just like in the NHL playoffs.

Canada only figured out to use their speed to gain the zone in the 3rd, and by then it was too little too late. The first two periods, the breakout was a mess and nobody was winning puck battles. Pure domination by the US.
 
They only had 3 challenging games in the tournament

Give me a break. And this is a perfect example of everything that is wrong about junior sports. Entitled fans who decide to call out 18 year old kids for not being at 100% throughout the tournament while they gorge themselves in their sofas. They didn't play competitive hockey for 8 months, they blew out everyone else to smithereens, they played well, but not as good as USA and you rage on about entitlement? Take a look in the mirror.
 
  • Like
Reactions: avsfan09
They only had 3 challenging games in the tournament
Every game is challenging. This is best on best. They were simply better than everyone.

They ran into a hungry team usa and had an off night. Single game tournaments mean anything can happen.
 
  • Like
Reactions: golffuul
I love Cozens and think he’s going to be a great pro, but damn did he pick a bad game to have a stinker.
Yeah...a few guys laid big egg, peformance-wise, who had been solid all tournament long. Tough to see, but this is the kind of experience that will hopefully motivate them to become better players and realize that being a pro is about being consistent at a high level.
 
ah who cares! with the year we all experienced we should be thrilled we had a tournament at all. It wouldn't be Christmas without one. So, I'm thankful for that,

Let's go for Gold next year!
 
  • Like
Reactions: snipes and sabresEH
Embarrassing performance.

The lack of an elite level gamebreaker was on full display in that game.


Easily the most overrated world junior team I can remember. They get their ass handed to them by last year's team with Lafreniere.
 
  • Like
Reactions: robsenz
In the grand scheme of things all the tournament participants deserve a round of applause for going into the bubble and giving us fans a sense of normalcy in these unusual and stressful times. You hear stories of Team Canada going into a long quarantine, being away from home over the holidays and Team Germany coming all this way just to get hit hard by Covid and to get wrecked on the ice. These are remarkable human stories.

From a strictly hockey storyline point of view though, it’s not the best look for a team flirting with tournament long perfection to just completely get smothered the first sign of trouble. No urgency, no composure, no game breaking talent to save the day. The WJC is usually full of these kind of emotional swings but I always dread these storylines when Goliath gets it right between the eyes and all that psychological fragility is laid bare.
 
Embarrassing performance.

The lack of an elite level gamebreaker was on full display in that game.


Easily the most overrated world junior team I can remember. They get their ass handed to them by last year's team with Lafreniere.
Settle down man they are kids who had one bad game. Had they won this game you'd be the same guy saying what a dominant performance
 
Settle down man they are kids who had one bad game. Had they won this game you'd be the same guy saying what a dominant performance


Blame the media for over hyping a mediocre Canadian team in a down year for the tournanent.

I never got it, their terribe PP spoke volumes in comparison to past years. The gamebreakers from previous simply were not there this year.

Deep team, no gamebreakers.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Deuce22 and robsenz
I don't think the GMG was really determined by desire or skill, or "bad picks" I think it ended up being matchups and coaching, and the inability to adjust quickly enough. We could highlight a few mistakes here and there made by some players, but mistakes are part of the game.

No, what I think happened is that we found out too late in the game is that;
1) The way to break down the US defense was to use sandpaper-type players like Holloway and Mercer on the forecheck.
2) Cute, behind the back, no-look passes to break out of the zone works well against Switzerland, and Germany, who retreated into the neutral zone to try to turnover the puck - less well against a team that will put pressure on your wingers in the Offensive zone.
3) Support your teammates; individual plays won't work against a solid 5-man unit - too often was the puck poked away from one of our players, and the supporting players were a bit too far to recover the puck.

That was the difference between Gold and Silver.
 
I agree that the team was overhyped based on skill level. It is easy to make the connection when every forward was a 1st round pick however to actually watch them play I didn't see any forward with game breaking ability. Lots of development time left for all these kids but most look to be bottom 6 forwards at the NHL level if/when they make it.
 
I think Canada was able to overwhelm Finland with their pressure and forechecking.. Same with Russia because they don't have quite the depth that USA has. But, USA is able to match the depth while having elite forwards on their team. We can now say that McMichael, Krebs, and Newhook are not on the level of Zegras, Caufield or Turcotte.

Why is Caulfield in that group? I was underwhelmed by his performance. He was maybe the 5th or 6th best forward of their group IMO.

And you dont mention Cozens?
 
Every game is challenging. This is best on best. They were simply better than everyone.

They ran into a hungry team usa and had an off night. Single game tournaments mean anything can happen.
16-2 and 10-0 were challenging games?
 
The Finns have a poor tournament? The last 3 Games were very good by the finns.

Fair, but I guess what I'm saying is I expected more of them since they had a decent team compared to other teams. They finished 3rd not by being amazing but rather the other teams were real bad. They were still the 3rd best team in the tourney so I don't want to make it sound like they were terrible but Canada and USA were just on a different level for this year.

I was also expecting more from some of their guys, Jarventie was a ghost for example.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dack

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad