The difference between productive offensive players and bottom 6 players isn't just skill, its a mindset. Attacking players think differently, they are optomistic. They believe that pass will go thru, that they have the angle on the defender, that they have enough time to get that shot off before they get closed in on. They put themselves in positions to use their skills and succeed.
Other players, even quality ones, don't produce as much because they are pessimists. They think that that pass is going to get tipped, that the seem is going to close before the puck gets thru, that the shot they can get off isn't likely to be good enough to take. They think safely, protectively, and it lessens their offensive output.
The Kings have been developing optomistic thinking players into pessimistic ones. Safety first to the detriment of the attack.
Its been happening for over a decade now, back to Frolov and Kopitar. Drives me crazy when players with such world class offensive skills assume such pessimistic positions on the ice when the team so badly needs offense. Not just for goals, but to release pressure, change the tone of the game to a more favorable one and make the opposition think more negatively. Also makes it easier for the next generation of offensive players to step in to a more positive enviornment here.
Is Mike Cammalleri the last offense-first forward developed here?
This team has kept the ultra pessimistic Terry Murray thinking but lost the low event macho Sutter style that weaponized defense first hockey. And suffered for it. They just won't evolve the plan.