Kings are in a playoff spot and you better believe that's now the goal of this season -- players will develop (maybe not how some of the fanbase wants), but management is not going to sacrifice team success for development.
This is mostly true. With what they did in the offseason there is no way they were going to play the develop strategy, and especially not when they are the third best team in the division through the half way point. This is a team that most seasons since 2014 has always told us, "We are only (x amount) of points out of the wildcard", "we are one good streak away" and "we just need a chance, look at 2012", they believe in these veterans even if it could be the death of their rebuild. Sorry guys, they aren't calling up young players and handing them spots in a playoff race. Byfield is up because they view him as the best option for the 3rd line center spot and Turcotte because he is the best option for the 4th line left wing even if it isn't the best option for either guys long-term development. The youth won't be handed chances until the Kings have an "x" to their name or whatever the legend says means "Eliminated from Playoffs"
Now I am on record as disagreeing with this way of thinking because I believe Luc and Blake are putting us in the black hole again. I would have rather seen another bad year but again with what they did this offseason we shouldn't be surprised with how this has played out with the usage of the youth.
Not excuses, you just clearly don't get it.
The rebuild doesn't end by simply drafting players, it ends when those picks replace the old and feeble players ahead of them.
That doesn't happen until the babysteps are taken and the players grow into NHLers. Every single one of the kids who debuted this year were ready for that first step out of camp. But, this organization still has delusions of grandeur and installed speed bumps instead of taking the correct route.
You could maybe change your tone, the "You don't get it" when discussing intangible stuff just makes you sound like a jerk. The person you are talking with has clearly shown solid knowledge of the game in his years posting here.
As for the rest of the post, you talk about development and everyone being ready, I respectfully disagree. There is no concern at all that Turcotte as RJ said "Is being programed into a good checker?" To me it seems like nothing they have done with this player since drafting him has been right move if they are trying to develop him into a high end 2nd line center (which should be the floor of a Top 5 pick). They seem like to steal another one from RJ "are developing him to be a Cogliano". He was rushed out of college showing nothing close to dominant offensive play at that level (9 points in 21 conf games). No big deal, it's a big jump in play from the USHL to NCAA, tell him to work on offensive skills and live in the weight room. Dozens of other teams have said the same exact thing with players who had similar seasons with mostly positive results. You think Josh Norris (a similar talent) is having this kind of success if he leaves school early? Compare the players, both NTDP/NCAA guys. Turcotte much more productive as a 17 year old more productive as a freshman. Both had disappointing freshman seasons and then their development paths unfortunately went in different directions. That is why in many cases development is just as important as evaluating.
The Kings are different though, that is what they said, they wanted him in their 'vaunted' development system lead by the GM's best friend.
As far as QB, its tough to say this in the short term because Danault has been amazing, but with the center situation did it make sense? It's just going to be tough for Byfield and almost impossible for Turcotte, Vilardi, JAD to crack the NHL in their natural positions. Again, Danault has been great and I think we all figured he'd be pretty good the first 2 or 3 years, but he is going to make it tough for some guys the Kings heavily invested in to crack the NHL roster.