Speculation: 2021-21 LA Kings News/Rumors/Roster discussion

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
The Kings weren’t looking to tear down the roster or change what makes them successful. Goaltending, strong D, and power scheme to overrun the opposition. It is a successful formula for the playoffs as we all saw. Plus we just saw Colorado, a high octane offense get overrun by the Knights. A player like Mark Stone, who isn’t a fast skater by any means, was very effective.

In regards to Lucic, in his lone season with the Kings was he was a 20 goal scorer with 35 assists on the wing. Contrast that with the previous season where the Kings were rolling with Pearson (16 points), Clifford (15 points), Dwight King (26 points) on the left side. I don’t need to tell you that Lucic was a massive upgrade to those guys and filled a huge hole on the roster.

Price was steep in trading Jones, Colin Miller, and a first (Zboril) but Lombardi was in a tough spot with forwards. Stoll and Williams left the Kings, so their leadership was gone.

The price was steeper than that, unless you think Futa wasn't being truthful. This organization is just in a totally different spot with Barzal right now and in the future.

Lucic was just not a fit for the Kings, they were never going to have the space to sign him and he wasn't a missing piece to put them over the top. Just like with the inexplicable decision to not buyout Richards it was Dean Lombardi showing his obsession with a certain type of player, and having that player on the roster even when it made zero sense.

It was like Al Davis with speedy WR's, he was obsessed with bringing as many in as possible even when it wasn't a fit because he was obsessed with them.
 
With Eichel on his way out and Buffalo probably needing a replacement would you guys do something like Power for Byfield?

Gets us our much needed young top pairing LHD with lots of size.

What if instead of Byfield it was Turcotte + Kupari/Madden

Unbeknownst to you Cliffy's wave and toothless grin in this pic was really just trying to tell your future self to calm down on the trade proposals before we eat our young.

giphy.gif
 
If I am putting Turcotte and Kupari in a package it would be with another piece for Werenski.

Neither Turcotte nor Kupari made enough tangible progress this year to be the main return for a #1D like Werenski. All the risk in this trade would be on the Columbus side. If they were taking a prospect back it would have to be Byfield.

Now, Turcotte and either Bjornfot, Roy, or Walker for Jones might work for Columbus given their need to trade him. But even then, the return is pretty light compared to what others would offer.

And @Herby is right, there is a large separation in the prospect pool between Byfield and the rest.
 
The price was steeper than that, unless you think Futa wasn't being truthful. This organization is just in a totally different spot with Barzal right now and in the future.

Lucic was just not a fit for the Kings, they were never going to have the space to sign him and he wasn't a missing piece to put them over the top. Just like with the inexplicable decision to not buyout Richards it was Dean Lombardi showing his obsession with a certain type of player, and having that player on the roster even when it made zero sense.

It was like Al Davis with speedy WR's, he was obsessed with bringing as many in as possible even when it wasn't a fit because he was obsessed with them.

Lucic was a fit, he scored 20 goals with 35 assists. Highest production from a left winger since…Frolov in 2008 with 59 points. In terms of the future and where he fit, it was a balance that DL was working on. DL said that they were working on a 5 year plan after Kopitar was extended. It was rumored that DL offered Lucic an 8 year 34 million dollar contract to make the cap space work for other players that the Kings had to sign.


The other point is that you don’t sign Kopitar, Quick, Doughty to large contracts and do a rebuild right after winning your second cup. It just doesn’t happen.
 
DL wasn’t wrong about the flavor of the month comment. Even Bluc and the players in their first introductory press conference said they need speed, but never got speed and acquired slow players like Phaneuf/Kovalchuk.

Speed is nothing new in the NHL and was blown out of proportion years ago.

Look at the remaining teams in the playoffs, speed isn’t the determining factor in where they ended up to this point.

Bingo! The defining factors that has gotten teams to the final four are heart and culture. Yes, they have good players as well, but no one on Vegas or Montreal took a selfish penalty like Kadri and Scheifele did that ultimately doomed their teams' chances. Look at the Islanders- their leading scorer was injured for the season and they still totally out played two very good teams. You can tell they want it bad. Same with Vegas who came back and dominated a much faster team after being thrashed in game one of their series. DL understood this. The 2012 and 2014 teams wanted to win badly, and it showed on the ice. If you want to point to one thing that ended the Kings run, it was the Voynov suspension/imprisonment. After losing Scuderi, Mitchell and Regehr, he was being counted on to play a much larger role. DL no doubt made mistakes, but his philosophy was the correct one. I'll never forget that Luc stabbed him in the back. That's how cultures are destroyed.
 
Last edited:
I disagree, he didn't realize that the game was opening up and the grit and size stuff at the very least had to be complimented by skill. Trading for Lucic and then trying tio double down by signing him to a 7 year deal just proved how out of touch he was.

Again, the Kings have not drafted what would be considered a good 1st line player in 15 years, and it is not bad luck, they have just chosen not focus on those types of players if they also didn't have something like grit, size or two-way play and its cost them the chance to draft some highly skilled players.

I’d argue Toffoli is a good 1st line player that we have away because he got complacent like the rest of the roster.
 
Bingo! The defining factors that has gotten teams to the final four are heart and culture. Yes, they have good players as well, but no one on Vegas or Montreal took a selfish penalty like Kadri and Scheifele did that ultimately doomed their teams' chances. Look at the Islanders- their leading scorer was injured for the season and they still totally out played two very good teams. You can tell they want it bad. Same with Vegas who came back and dominated a much faster team after being thrashed in game one of their series. DL understood this. The 2012 and 2014 teams wanted to win badly, and it showed on the ice. If you want to point to one thing that ended the Kings run, it was the Voynov suspension/imprisonment. After losing Scuderi, Mitchell and Regehr, he was being counted on to lay a much larger role. DL no doubt made mistakes, but his philosophy was the correct one. I'll never forget that Luc stabbed him in the back. That's how cultures are destroyed.
Luc Robitaille, with the knife, in the film room.
 
He was the AGM so he already should have known what they had. He thought they were a contender. That's the whole point. He missed the mark in a massive way. Tons of guys had trade value in the Summer of 17.

Who had value in the summer of 2017? Maybe Doughty. However, if he wanted to stay here, they weren't going to voluntarily get rid of him. They paid Quick, Brown, and Kopitar. They weren't going to change that by choosing to move Doughty. Without the Cups, maybe. He probably chooses to get the hell out without the Cups.

Coaches, executives and non-star players all have expiration dates. Dean Lombardi and Darryl Sutter's expiration dates came and they were correctly moved on from.

Plus, I am not sure about the culture stuff anymore. As someone else pointed out the culture was declining as much as the product on the ice. Stoll (and who knows who else) busted for coke in Vegas, not buying-out Richards despite being the worst player on the team, the Voynov debacle and embarrassing actions taken by the organization, the Richards border debacle and embarrassing actions taken by the organization, the Sutter lockerroom lockout, Brown being stripped of his C for no reason. Those are not examples of a strong culture.

It was time to move on, only mistake was who they hired.

What comes first, culture or talent? What's culture without talent? What's talent without culture?

I think we've gotten obsessed with this word culture. That's what losing and/or not winning does though. It makes everyone question everything all the time. Before the Kings won anything meaningful, we obsessed about Purcell being traded for nothing. How do you lose Matt Moulson for nothing? Hickey is the #4 pick? Hickey?!?!?!?!?! That all happened while the "culture" was still being formed. How do you question moves when the culture is so good?

Winning cures all. It is, without a doubt, the truest phrase you will ever hear. Win, and everything you did before that is either forgotten, or worth it. Easily justified or rationalized, because you won, which is the whole point of everything. Obviously the right things were done up to that point, otherwise you wouldn't have won. It only makes sense. Win, correct. Lose, wrong.

The Kings weren’t looking to tear down the roster or change what makes them successful. Goaltending, strong D, and power scheme to overrun the opposition. It is a successful formula for the playoffs as we all saw. Plus we just saw Colorado, a high octane offense get overrun by the Knights. A player like Mark Stone, who isn’t a fast skater by any means, was very effective.

In regards to Lucic, in his lone season with the Kings was he was a 20 goal scorer with 35 assists on the wing. Contrast that with the previous season where the Kings were rolling with Pearson (16 points), Clifford (15 points), Dwight King (26 points) on the left side. I don’t need to tell you that Lucic was a massive upgrade to those guys and filled a huge hole on the roster.

Price was steep in trading Jones, Colin Miller, and a first (Zboril) but Lombardi was in a tough spot with forwards. Stoll and Williams left the Kings, so their leadership was gone.

Jones had little value for the Kings, and outside of one year in, of course, Vegas, Miller has been nothing special. The 1st was the only piece that had value for the Kings. DL made the choice that he still wanted to win with Kopitar on a good contract. Lucic at 50% replaced Williams on the cap down to, I think, the penny.

The 14-15 season was horrible. Obviously Voynov. If he's there, there's probably no Sekera. Had they just made the playoffs with Sekera, there's no 2015 pick for DL to trade, since that's the pick that would've gone to Carolina. Kopitar, up to that point, had the worst season of his career. Even if you thought about trading him, because the dreaded 3rd contract was coming, you'd be selling low.

Then when the Kings were at least a decent team, in the standings anyway, in 15-16, at least up until Kopitar got his contract, that also didn't help. Had they just been a bad team in 15-16, maybe the deadline is different. But, they get Lucic in the summer, bring in Lecavalier, Versteeg, and try to win with some offense. The way they managed to win in the 2014 playoffs, because the team defense by then wasn't as solid as it used to be. They had to outscore Chicago, they didn't stop them. They had to come back many, many times against the Rangers, from multiple goal deficits.

The price was steeper than that, unless you think Futa wasn't being truthful. This organization is just in a totally different spot with Barzal right now and in the future.

Lucic was just not a fit for the Kings, they were never going to have the space to sign him and he wasn't a missing piece to put them over the top. Just like with the inexplicable decision to not buyout Richards it was Dean Lombardi showing his obsession with a certain type of player, and having that player on the roster even when it made zero sense.

It was like Al Davis with speedy WR's, he was obsessed with bringing as many in as possible even when it wasn't a fit because he was obsessed with them.

They were too close to 2014 and the just get in mentality to not take a shot in 15-16. Just get in, and you never know what the Kings will do. The problem with Barzal, or anyone else people cry about the Kings not being able to get that year, is that they didn't help their teams for 2 years. The Kings didn't have 2 years to waste at the time. Now they ended up wasting those 2 years, or at least 1 if you want to count just getting in one time, but that new Kopitar contract was looming on the horizon.

One season in 14-15 of barely missing the playoffs wasn't enough time to properly reset things. They needed more years of not winning, and more time before Kopitar was going to get paid for 2 Cups. It was all crunched together within 24 months though.

Bingo! The defining factors that has gotten teams to the final four are heart and culture. Yes, they have good players as well, but no one on Vegas or Montreal took a selfish penalty like Kadri and Scheifele did that ultimately doomed their teams' chances. Look at the Islanders- their leading scorer was injured for the season and they still totally out played two very good teams. You can tell they want it bad. Same with Vegas who came back and dominated a much faster team after being thrashed in game one of their series. DL understood this. The 2012 and 2014 teams wanted to win badly, and it showed on the ice. If you want to point to one thing that ended the Kings run, it was the Voynov suspension/imprisonment. After losing Scuderi, Mitchell and Regehr, he was being counted on to lay a much larger role. DL no doubt made mistakes, but his philosophy was the correct one. I'll never forget that Luc stabbed him in the back. That's how cultures are destroyed.

So is it culture, or talent? Lose Voynov, and that's where the Kings run ended? Why? The 14-15 team was made up of pretty much the entire team that won in 2014. What happened to wanting it badly? If the culture is there, you should survive that. The Kings survived in a playoff series without Mitchell and Regehr, while having to play Jeff Schultz, just a few months earlier. Where did that team go? Where did that strong culture go?

Granted, the NHL rarely gave the Kings a direct answer in regard to Voynov. Was he coming back, was he not coming back? 50 games? A year? Forever?
 
Who had value in the summer of 2017? Maybe Doughty. However, if he wanted to stay here, they weren't going to voluntarily get rid of him. They paid Quick, Brown, and Kopitar. They weren't going to change that by choosing to move Doughty. Without the Cups, maybe. He probably chooses to get the hell out without the Cups.



What comes first, culture or talent? What's culture without talent? What's talent without culture?

I think we've gotten obsessed with this word culture. That's what losing and/or not winning does though. It makes everyone question everything all the time. Before the Kings won anything meaningful, we obsessed about Purcell being traded for nothing. How do you lose Matt Moulson for nothing? Hickey is the #4 pick? Hickey?!?!?!?!?! That all happened while the "culture" was still being formed. How do you question moves when the culture is so good?

Winning cures all. It is, without a doubt, the truest phrase you will ever hear. Win, and everything you did before that is either forgotten, or worth it. Easily justified or rationalized, because you won, which is the whole point of everything. Obviously the right things were done up to that point, otherwise you wouldn't have won. It only makes sense. Win, correct. Lose, wrong.



Jones had little value for the Kings, and outside of one year in, of course, Vegas, Miller has been nothing special. The 1st was the only piece that had value for the Kings. DL made the choice that he still wanted to win with Kopitar on a good contract. Lucic at 50% replaced Williams on the cap down to, I think, the penny.

The 14-15 season was horrible. Obviously Voynov. If he's there, there's probably no Sekera. Had they just made the playoffs with Sekera, there's no 2015 pick for DL to trade, since that's the pick that would've gone to Carolina. Kopitar, up to that point, had the worst season of his career. Even if you thought about trading him, because the dreaded 3rd contract was coming, you'd be selling low.

Then when the Kings were at least a decent team, in the standings anyway, in 15-16, at least up until Kopitar got his contract, that also didn't help. Had they just been a bad team in 15-16, maybe the deadline is different. But, they get Lucic in the summer, bring in Lecavalier, Versteeg, and try to win with some offense. The way they managed to win in the 2014 playoffs, because the team defense by then wasn't as solid as it used to be. They had to outscore Chicago, they didn't stop them. They had to come back many, many times against the Rangers, from multiple goal deficits.



They were too close to 2014 and the just get in mentality to not take a shot in 15-16. Just get in, and you never know what the Kings will do. The problem with Barzal, or anyone else people cry about the Kings not being able to get that year, is that they didn't help their teams for 2 years. The Kings didn't have 2 years to waste at the time. Now they ended up wasting those 2 years, or at least 1 if you want to count just getting in one time, but that new Kopitar contract was looming on the horizon.

One season in 14-15 of barely missing the playoffs wasn't enough time to properly reset things. They needed more years of not winning, and more time before Kopitar was going to get paid for 2 Cups. It was all crunched together within 24 months though.



So is it culture, or talent? Lose Voynov, and that's where the Kings run ended? Why? The 14-15 team was made up of pretty much the entire team that won in 2014. What happened to wanting it badly? If the culture is there, you should survive that. The Kings survived in a playoff series without Mitchell and Regehr, while having to play Jeff Schultz, just a few months earlier. Where did that team go? Where did that strong culture go?

Granted, the NHL rarely gave the Kings a direct answer in regard to Voynov. Was he coming back, was he not coming back? 50 games? A year? Forever?


The 2014-2015 Kings team had just come off of three years in a row of playing deep into the playoffs- it is naïve to think that fatigue was not a factor. In addition, Mitchell was gone and Regehr had announced it would be his final season. It was obvious Williams was not coming back either. Those are three key leaders. Then you had the drama surrounding Richards. Voynov was the final nail in the coffin. Even teams with a lot of character cannot overcome all the obstacles set in their path. You can blame DL for the moves he made trying to make up for the (impending) losses but not for the unfortunate circumstances he was faced with. In retrospect, he should have thought about retooling rather than betting the farm on winning another Cup with Sekera and then Lucic, but we have the benefit of 20/20 hindsight.
 
The 2014-2015 Kings team had just come off of three years in a row of playing deep into the playoffs- it is naïve to think that fatigue was not a factor. In addition, Mitchell was gone and Regehr had announced it would be his final season. It was obvious Williams was not coming back either. Those are three key leaders. Then you had the drama surrounding Richards. Voynov was the final nail in the coffin. Even teams with a lot of character cannot overcome all the obstacles set in their path. You can blame DL for the moves he made trying to make up for the (impending) losses but not for the unfortunate circumstances he was faced with. In retrospect, he should have thought about retooling rather than betting the farm on winning another Cup with Sekera and then Lucic, but we have the benefit of 20/20 hindsight.

We did use that fatigue excuse a lot. After. I think when the 14-15 was just getting started, nobody was really talking about how tired the team was going to be, either mentally, physically, or emotionally.

I the context of a team is important, then Blake needs to get the same treatment for what he has, or hasn't done. We don't even know how much ownership has said strip the roster. Get this thing cheap. We're done paying for nothing. You got nothing in 2017, but Kopitar, Doughty, and Quick just had to save the day that season. Without Carter, that team should've been dead. Ok, give them another player. They did, tried to get others, and then everything collapsed. Does that team have character or not? If obstacles can stop character, how do you know?
 
They still went with size, two-way play and grit over higher skill in the first round in 2017, 2019 and 2020. We will see how 2020 plays out, my guess is both players turn into superstars so we can toss that one out. But the other ones, it's tough to ignore what some of the players the Kings had a chance to draft have done at the NHL level.

They gambled bigtime by not drafting Arty with #23 in 2019, ultimately you have to give Blake credit for knowing the situation and taking the calculated risk, but had they missed out on Kaliyev it would have been a disaster. I think an organization that more highly valued that type of player would have taken him there and then looked for the future #3 d-man with the next pick, happy it worked out but I still think it shows, (along with their picks in 17 and 19) that there are other things they value more.



Feels like Columbus could get more, depending on what your other piece is. Werenski is a stud, one of the best goal-scoring d-man in the league and still only 23 and still an RFA. The return would be pretty massive.

Yeah, 2019 is going to be interesting, but I think if the Kings were going with size, grit, and 2-way they certainly don't take Turcotte but Cozens. He's big, powerful, and not far off defensively from Turcotte, probably 2nd best in the draft. Turcotte put up better numbers than Caufield and Zegras their last year in the US program which is a direct comparable, so it's not like they didn't draft for skill there. And Turcotte is tiny compared to Cozens. Also, didn't Yanetti say something to the effect that they had a forward and a D that were a dead heat at 22 and they only took Bjornfot because of the run on defense? I'm not sure if that forward was Arty but the Kings sure were high on him pre-draft. Heck they traded up for Fagemo that draft who is a smaller skilled guy.

Who else was around in 2017 who was a more skilled type than Vilardi? Gabe was generally thought to be going #3 overall by most because of his skill level, at worst #5. Just because he's big doesn't mean it's not a skill pick. If they want size and grit, they take Foote there.

I tend to agree on 2020, although Byfield is no slouch skill-wise.

I do agree they are still hesitant to take undersized players regardless of their skill level, but I think the days of grit are over. Our system is nearly devoid of that, it's a pretty big weakness. Same with two-way guys, we don't avoid them, but don't target them either.
 
This current core faltered after 2014 because of the exodus of the actual leadership that was brought in to be the balls this team needed.

They may have not been the highest paid players on the team, but Williams, Stoll, Greene, Richards, Mitchell, and Regehr were the spine of those cup teams. I’d argue that quick was also a major part of the leadership group that fostered that winning culture, but compete only goes so far when your body is breaking down.

Outside of Dustin Brown going HAM in 2012, none of the core skaters have ever been true on-ice leaders.
 
This current core faltered after 2014 because of the exodus of the actual leadership that was brought in to be the balls this team needed.

They may have not been the highest paid players on the team, but Williams, Stoll, Greene, Richards, Mitchell, and Regehr were the spine of those cup teams. I’d argue that quick was also a major part of the leadership group that fostered that winning culture, but compete only goes so far when your body is breaking down.

Outside of Dustin Brown going HAM in 2012, none of the core skaters have ever been true on-ice leaders.

Also a talent exodus. Too many guys lost for nothing, with no replacements. Most of those leaders were still here in 14-15, and they couldn't beat a pre-McDavid Oilers team in the last week of the season, to even give themselves a chance to make the playoffs. That 14-15 season is/was just such a problem in so many ways.

The deeper problem was the 2014 run though. In terms of roster building. They had no business beating the Sharks. Had they just gone out in the 1st, or any round, and they had a chance to lose in all 4, yes, even against the Rangers, things likely would've changed more. DL made changes after 2013, so if they don't win the Cup in 2014, things would've changed. Richards is bought out, no question. If they lose in 2014, that myth around Richards is completely dead, even for an emotional guy like DL. As we saw less then a year later, he had no issue kicking Richards out the door as needed. Gaborik isn't back, or at least not with that stupid ass contract. Greene isn't back. Mitchell still goes.

Then, even if 14-15 was still the train wreck that it was, also assuming Voynov is still Voynov, there's not another myth, this one being that the Kings just have to get in. The Kings would've been a one hit wonder at that point. There's probably no Sekera trade. There's no Lucic trade. There's no just get in, because you're now 2 years removed from that crap. Or 3, depending on ow you want to calculate that.

As great as it was, the run in 2014 is what launched the bad years of Lombardi. He got caught up in it. When you do what they did, I guess there's a reason to have that invincible feeling. You add 2012 to it, and even the scratching and clawing of 2013, and the thought that this team can do anything isn't completely crazy. However, every empire falls. There just wasn't a reason to think within the next 7 years, they'd have 1 playoff win, and their last playoff win on home ice would be Jazz Hands. Even the most pessimistic of fans wouldn't have predicted that in July 2014. Coming off that high? Nah.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Raccoon Jesus
I don't care about size and grit. Show me a modern team that cares more about size and grit and I'll show you a failure. Size gets killed in today's NHL. Grit can't sand opposition when the opposition skates around you. Hitting is failing. It puts you out of position and it risks injury.
 
I don't care about size and grit. Show me a modern team that cares more about size and grit and I'll show you a failure. Size gets killed in today's NHL. Grit can't sand opposition when the opposition skates around you. Hitting is failing. It puts you out of position and it risks injury.
How’d that work out for the Av’s or the Leafs this year?

Balls & skill aren’t mutually exclusive, you need both to win. Vegas is living proof of that.
 
Also a talent exodus. Too many guys lost for nothing, with no replacements. Most of those leaders were still here in 14-15, and they couldn't beat a pre-McDavid Oilers team in the last week of the season, to even give themselves a chance to make the playoffs. That 14-15 season is/was just such a problem in so many ways.

This is exactly it. The leadership departure narrative is so overblown especially here for years to rationalize why the team didn't play as well. Guess what? When a player leaves your team and you do not replace him with commensurate talent your team is going to be worse. For all of the players who left the team after 2014 they were all replaced with worse talent.
 
Yeah, 2019 is going to be interesting, but I think if the Kings were going with size, grit, and 2-way they certainly don't take Turcotte but Cozens. He's big, powerful, and not far off defensively from Turcotte, probably 2nd best in the draft. Turcotte put up better numbers than Caufield and Zegras their last year in the US program which is a direct comparable, so it's not like they didn't draft for skill there. And Turcotte is tiny compared to Cozens. Also, didn't Yanetti say something to the effect that they had a forward and a D that were a dead heat at 22 and they only took Bjornfot because of the run on defense? I'm not sure if that forward was Arty but the Kings sure were high on him pre-draft. Heck they traded up for Fagemo that draft who is a smaller skilled guy.

Who else was around in 2017 who was a more skilled type than Vilardi? Gabe was generally thought to be going #3 overall by most because of his skill level, at worst #5. Just because he's big doesn't mean it's not a skill pick. If they want size and grit, they take Foote there.

I tend to agree on 2020, although Byfield is no slouch skill-wise.

I do agree they are still hesitant to take undersized players regardless of their skill level, but I think the days of grit are over. Our system is nearly devoid of that, it's a pretty big weakness. Same with two-way guys, we don't avoid them, but don't target them either.
I still believe good big men beat good little men more often than not, especially in the NHL playoffs.
 
This board loves to live in the past.

And kill the present too.

@KingsFan7824

Carter jumps out as a guy with value when Blake took over. Aside from him, you have everyone else he eventually wound up trading anyways.

The problem with Carter in 2017 is that he was already 32, with 5 years left. That guy doesn't have much value in a hard cap league. Look around the league. Not many guys fitting that criteria are being traded. If they are, they're probably traded for a guy in a similar situation. It's not just an idiot BLuc thing. If he had 1 year left, or was 28, that's a different story, but he had age, and term, going against him. What happened to him a couple games into the 17-18 season? Exactly. You could've traded Carter in 2017, but not for anything that helps a rebuild. Even with 1 year left, the Kings still had to retain 50%, and only got a couple conditional mid rd picks in future years. You can stretch that and say well those picks are assets that can be used later, and that's true, but they're marginal assets. It can get you another Andersson or Lemieux if you want. Ok, great. You need the role players, but they're not driving the train.

Now maybe on a better team, Carter comes back from his injury and actually gives a damn, but that's the risk few teams are willing to take with old guys that have multiple years left on their contracts.
 
How’d that work out for the Av’s or the Leafs this year?

Balls & skill aren’t mutually exclusive, you need both to win. Vegas is living proof of that.

I said teams that care MORE about size and grit. Obviously you need both but investing high end chips on grit is silly. Choose skill over grit at the top and fill the back end with the grit.
Trying to to find Dedmarsh's and Lindros' is a fool's errand.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad