I'm with you about Blake doing due diligence on Jones.
And I'm EVEN not saying it's a big deal that he's RHD.
But if we're going to blow our wad on an RHD, can we at least get a dynamic one?
Jones is a redundancy. A fantastic one, but won't help offense from the back end.
I just feel there are much better uses of our many assets than another defensive leaning RHD no matter how many minutes he can eat.
I'm not saying you are wrong and I'm not saying I'm right but I do agree with you that he is "a fantastic one".
When you look at the Kings best years, who were the dynamic offensive talents on the blueline? Doughty amped it up in the playoffs but he had 36 and 37 points in the 2012 and '14 regular seasons, respectively. What the Kings did have was a defense that could make an outlet pass that, in turn, helped make the offense better.
Doughty has a career regular season/playoff PPG of 0.54/0.61 while Jones is at 0.49/0.65. Drew has his kind of outlier seasons in 2010 and 2018 and Jones has his in 2018 which was probably helped by getting power play time with Panarin.
I agree that Jones isn't dynamic offensively but he's generally going to pace for 40 points with upside for more, plus he turns it on in the playoffs which might be important to this franchise at some point (maybe!). All of a sudden, this team has two real legit RHD for Anderson/Bjornfot to stick to and, hell, you might be able to lower how many minutes each of these guys has to eat since the RHD3 should be adequate enough to play decent minutes as well: especially if Roy wasn't included in the deal. It would be nice to be able to cut Doughty's minutes a bit since he has so many years left on the contract.
I get the argument against Jones but I just don't think it should be dismissed outright. There are arguments against trading for a forward--especially a center--because that is the position of strength in the prospect pool. There are arguments against any defenseman that isn't a LHD because we are "fine" on the right side (nobody brings up Faber in this but they should since he is a RHS). Then there is the argument to just not do anything because they aren't ready yet and I can respect that argument as well. There are so many ways to skin this thing as this is really a crossroads of a summer.
The thing is that it seems Blake is going to be looking to bring in players that can make an impact and, when you finish where the Kings have the last three years (or seven, if you like) and none of your prospects are in the "can't miss" category, it is hard to say there are any redundancies except for mediocre-to-garbage players. I believe for good or for bad, Blake is going to make an impact move for an impact player. There will be pros and cons to all the ones available and it will be interesting to see how it plays out. Blake still has a ton of DL guys in the scouting department...does Blake believe in building from the net out and then down the middle? His first signing--or one of his first ones--was Cal Petersen. He's pretty much drafted C at every turn but did start to look harder at defense with Grans/Faber in Round 2 last year. Much like DL, they haven't really been hot on drafting wingers. It wouldn't surprise me if he dipped into the prospect pool at C for someone like Jones since there doesn't look like anything like him in the prospect pool. Blake can then just set-and-forget his top 4 for years to come.